• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Malaysia taking step to withdraw from WHO. What about Singapore?

tobelightlight

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jun 17, 2020
Messages
13,607
Points
113
WHO: USA has backed down.. How is the problem of Malaysia?

Update 13:15

MEDIA STATEMENT
US WITHDRAWS FROM WHO: MALAYSIA NEEDS TO CONSIDER SIMILAR STEPS

KUALA LUMPUR, 24 JANUARY 2025 – The Islamic Consumers Association of Malaysia (PPIM) welcomes the bold step of the President of the United States, Donald J. Trump, who has signed an executive order to withdraw the United States from the World Health Organization (WHO). This action is seen as an effort to prioritize country sovereignty and ensure health management is more independent.

As is known, the United States is the largest contributor to the WHO, contributing about 18% of the organization's total funds, with the WHO budget for 2024-2025 estimated to be US$6.8 billion (RM27.2 billion).

The Trump administration's actions are not surprising in that it took similar steps in 2020. This step provides an opportunity for other countries, including Malaysia, to review the relationship with WHO and the country's public health policy.

Measures Proposed by PPIM:

1. Re-evaluation of the National Health Approach

Malaysia's health system, which is based on an allopathic approach or Western medicine, needs to be re-evaluated. This includes the use of synthetic drugs, antibiotics and vaccines that are often the main focus of the WHO.

2. Lessons from COVID-19 Pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic experience that exposes elements of deception, distortion, and negligence requires the establishment of a People's Special Action and Investigation Committee free to investigate:

The abuse of power and drainage of public funds by the Ministry of Health Malaysia (KKM), NPRA, and other agencies.

Violation of people's rights under Act 342 and amendments to that act.

Use of conventional vaccines and mRNA technology.

3. End of the Use of Vaccines

The use of vaccines should be stopped immediately, including the cancellation of mandatory vaccines under the Medical Waste Protection Scheme (SSPA).

Cases of deaths and injuries resulting from COVID-19 vaccine shots must be assessed, and appropriate compensation must be provided.

All recipients of COVID-19 vaccine will need to undergo an immunity test at a cost fully covered by the government.

4. Leaving WHO Membership

Malaysia is reasonable to consider steps to withdraw from WHO membership, as the United States did.

Legal action through the International Criminal Court should be taken against the parties responsible for the violation of rights and abuse of power.

Shout out to the Malaysian Government

PPIM urges the Malaysian Government to consider steps to exit WHO in order to guarantee the country's sovereignty. This decision is critical to building a more transparent, free of outside influences, and more resilient health system in the future.

Present to give views are

1. Toqqi@Nadzim Johan
2. Dr. Kenny Yong
3. Mr. Ahmad Jufliz
4. Dato' Sri Asri Yusoff
5. Dr. Noorazman Samsuddin

For any further enquiries, please contact PPIM Media Unit Hotline at +60136116666.

Issued By:
Islamic Consumers Association of Malaysia (PPIM)
24 January 2025
 
Does Singapore stupid incompetent tax payer money wasting ministers understand this? Jab lah jab lah, your whole family fucking die.
 

Malaysia moves to exit the WHO: Press conference tomorrow 24 January 2025​

Malaysians' decision to exit could serve as a catalyst for other countries, prompting a re-evaluation of their roles within controversial international organizations.​


Shabnam Palesa Mohamed
Jan 24, 2025
30
6
9
Share










The issue of nations withdrawing from international organizations has sparked debate across the world, with historic and recent developments shaping this discourse. Notably, the first and only recorded attempt to withdraw from the United Nations (UN) came from Indonesia in 1965.

Malaysia’s health freedom movement has been at the forefront of the #ExitTheWHO campaign and they are mobilising to withdraw. The Malaysian Muslim Consumers Association (PPIM) has taken a bold step by organizing a press conference advocating for Malaysia to exit the WHO.

Today, similar conversations are emerging as countries like the United States under President Donald J. Trump signal their withdrawal from the World Health Organization (WHO), which will be of effect in a year from now.


Indonesia’s 1965 UN Withdrawal: A Historical Parallel

Indonesia’s brief departure from the United Nations in 1965 is a historic precedent for nations challenging the authority of global organizations.

While the UN did not formally recognize Indonesia's withdrawal (as the UN Charter does not provide for such action), Indonesia remained absent from the organization for nearly two years. In 1966, Indonesia announced its decision to resume participation, marking the end of its self-imposed suspension.

This episode underscores the challenges of severing ties with international bodies, including questions of legality, diplomatic consequences, and the practical need for multilateral cooperation.




Malaysia’s Potential WHO Withdrawal: PPIM’s Press Conference

The Malaysian Muslim Consumers Association (PPIM) is spearheading the call for Malaysia to withdraw from the WHO. The decision by President Trump to exit the WHO, citing inefficiency and alleged bias, means that more people are asking about the relevance of such organizations in national and regional health.

The PPIM argues that Malaysia’s health policies are too dependent on the WHO, compromising national sovereignty. The association contends that a review of Malaysia’s health framework is necessary to better serve the interests of its people and ensure policies are rooted in local needs rather than global directives.

To voice these concerns, the PPIM is hosting a press conference:

Date
: 24 January 2025
Time: 11:00 am
Venue: Our Private Place, Level 3, Villa Puteri Condominium, Jalan Tun Ismail, 50480 KL




Implications for Other Asian Nations Considering WHO Withdrawal

A Malaysian withdrawal from the WHO could inspire other Asian countries to reconsider their roles within the organization. The decision would have far-reaching consequences:

1. Sovereignty in Health Policies

Exiting the WHO would grant nations greater autonomy in formulating health policies tailored to local contexts. Many Asian countries, including Indonesia and the Philippines, have expressed dissatisfaction with global health mandates that they perceive as one-size-fits-all solutions favoring Western nations or corporate interests.

2. Regional Health Cooperation

Withdrawal from the WHO could push Asian nations to develop alternative regional frameworks for health governance. Organizations like ASEAN may take on a larger role in coordinating health policies, focusing on localized needs and mutual support.

3. Geopolitical Shifts

Such a move would likely signal a shift in alliances. Countries withdrawing from the WHO might align more closely with nations like the U.S. or pursue partnerships with alternative international health organizations such as the World Council for Health, which has over 30 country councils internationally.




Conclusion

The call for Malaysia to exit the WHO, the recent U.S. withdrawal, and historical precedents like Indonesia’s 1965 UN withdrawal, represents a growing and active dissatisfaction with globalist governance structures.

For other nations, Malaysia’s decision could serve as a catalyst, prompting a broader re-evaluation of their roles within international organizations. As nations navigate these decisions, the challenge will be to balance national interests with international cooperation as people and not governments.

 
Back
Top