• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Majority Singaporeans or not?

Maverick01

Alfrescian
Loyal
In the NTU talk by LHL, one student commented that there were more FTs than locals....LHL promptly act smart as usual and ask the Sgreans to raise their hands instead...it was then reported with the attached picture that majority raised their hands hence saying there were more sgreans!!...however, from the angle that the picture was taken, was it conclusive? there were so many photographers that were around as evident in the pic, why did they use this picture as it only show close up of one section (blue circle) of the audience where majority raise their hands? If you look at the background audience (blue circle) the hands that were raised were more sparse evidently....illusion facts or real facts...let u decide and the actual audience presence to clarify..
 

Attachments

  • Majority.jpg
    Majority.jpg
    73.9 KB · Views: 115

SIFU

Alfrescian
Loyal
LHL should go to army camp auditorium and ask how many r sporeans... sure 100%

can satisfy his ego:oIo::oIo:
 

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
In the NTU talk by LHL, one student commented that there were more FTs than locals....LHL promptly act smart as usual and ask the Sgreans to raise their hands instead...it was then reported with the attached picture that majority raised their hands hence saying there were more sgreans!!...however, from the angle that the picture was taken, was it conclusive? there were so many photographers that were around as evident in the pic, why did they use this picture as it only show close up of one section (blue circle) of the audience where majority raise their hands? If you look at the background audience (blue circle) the hands that were raised were more sparse evidently....illusion facts or real facts...let u decide and the actual audience presence to clarify..

'sporeans' include PeeRs?
 
Top