• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

MAGA Dotard's most expensive Gerald Ford Carrier Down when Xijinping's is up!

Ang4MohTrump

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://mil.news.sina.com.cn/jssd/2018-05-12/doc-ihamfahx1385080.shtml

美军这艘全球最强航母真实战力成疑:海试中返港维修
美军这艘全球最强航母真实战力成疑:海试中返港维修

0
  近日,据美国媒体报道,此前出海海试的美国福特级航母提前返港,有消息称,福特级此时返回,是因为在海试期间,被查出“制造缺陷”和“不当指令”而临时决定尽快返港维修,这不是福特级第一次海试出现问题,此前,就在2018年1月,福特级也是在海试中出现问题而被迫返港维修。作为美军最先进,同时也是世界最前卫的福特级航母,频频海试出现问题,让外界对其的真实战力产生了疑问。

wwmS-hamfahx1345538.jpg

  福特级航母造价129亿美元,长度为333米,可搭载75架各型号飞机,与此同时,福特级还使用了最新的电磁弹射技术以及其他美军最新的科研成果,而这也成为了福特级问题重重的根由。福特级航母项目启动很早,早在上世纪90年代,精确的说,是1996年就已经开始,距今22年。福特级的设计就是要成为尼米兹级航空母舰的升级版,在福特级身上要使用最新的电磁弹射,最新的核反应堆以及最新的全电系统等等,可以说,福特级不是尼米兹级的升级版,其完全是跨代的作品。由于技术要求太高,原本打算2013年11月下水的福特级航母,一直等到了4年后的2017年才艰难下水,正当美国为此欢欣鼓舞时,福特级种种问题的报出为福特的前途蒙上了阴影。

C6T1-hamfahx1345559.jpg

  为何福特号问题重重得不到根本解决?归根结底,是由于其技术过于先进,从而导致应用性不足。福特号航母采用了诸多新技术,电磁弹射技术、核动力技术、先进拦阻技术以及隐身舰载战斗机等等,这些新技术成熟度较差,在美军评估中,多项关键技术的低于7级,这表明这些技术不仅自运行问题重重,多技术融合更具有较大的风险。

  就拿福特级航母最为得意的电磁弹射技术来讲,美军将电磁弹射装置交由通用原子公司进行研发制造,然而后者明显在这一项目上倍感吃力,目前福特级上安装到位的电磁弹射系统的性能指标已经和当初合同规定的水平完全不同。在电磁弹射的多次全系统测试中,暴露出了一些严重的问题。此前认为电磁弹射无需更多操作人员的设想也被推翻,不得已又重新设置更多的战位。与此同时,此前鼓吹的电磁弹射可以精确控制力量输出,实践中也证明远超理论估计,其巨大的弹射力有时候连F/A-18都承受不住。更为致命的是,其弹射系统在战时难以维修,并且一台弹射器无法工作将影响其他3台弹射器的工作。也就是说,一台弹射器损坏,福特级将无法进行舰载机起飞作业,这无疑是致命的缺陷。

_Tni-hamfahx1345584.jpg

  除了电磁弹射器,其鼓吹的全电推进也证明是子虚乌有,由于其全电系统易引发电路故障,因此,前3艘“福特”级航母依旧使用蒸汽涡轮直接驱动4轴螺旋桨推进。 后续有何变化,主要看美军是否攻克了相关技术。

  总而言之,航母海试出现问题很正常,尤其是采用诸多先进技术的福特级。但是,诸多新技术的堆砌,是否是一型航母合理的发展思路,值得美国,也值得我国深思。(作者署名:利刃/张阳)



The true strength of the U.S. military, the world’s most powerful carrier, is doubtful: returning to the harbor during the sea trials
The true strength of the U.S. military, the world’s most powerful carrier, is doubtful: returning to the harbor during the sea trials
0

Recently, according to U.S. media reports, the US Ford class aircraft carrier that went to sea trials earlier returned to Hong Kong in advance. According to sources, the Ford class returned at this time because during the sea trial, it was found that "manufacture defects" and "improper instructions" were detected. The temporary decision to return to Hong Kong as soon as possible was not the first time the Ford-class sea trial had a problem. Prior to this, in January 2018, the Ford class was forced to return to Hong Kong for maintenance because of problems in the sea trials. As the most advanced and at the same time the most advanced Ford class aircraft carrier in the US military, frequent sea trial problems have caused questions about the true combat capabilities of the outside world.

The Ford class aircraft carrier costs $12.9 billion and its length is 333 meters. It can carry 75 aircraft of various types. At the same time, the Ford grade also uses the latest electromagnetic ejection technology and other US military's latest scientific research results, and this has also become Ford. The root cause of the problem. The Ford aircraft carrier project started very early, as early as the 1990s, to be precise, it was started in 1996, 22 years ago. The Ford-class design is to become an upgraded version of the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier. To use the latest electromagnetic missiles on the Ford class, the latest nuclear reactor and the latest all-electric system, etc., it can be said that the Ford grade is not Nimitz-class. The upgraded version is completely cross-generational. Due to high technical requirements, the Ford aircraft carrier, which was originally scheduled to launch in November 2013, has waited until 4 years after its launch in 2017. As the United States rejoices, Ford’s problems are reported as Ford’s future. Shadowed.

Why is the problem of Ford's number not being solved fundamentally? In the final analysis, it is due to its advanced technology, which results in insufficient application. The Ford aircraft carrier uses many new technologies, including electromagnetic ejection technology, nuclear power technology, advanced anti-blocking technology, and stealth ship-based fighter aircraft. These new technologies have poor maturity, and many key technologies are lower than Level 7 in the US military evaluation. This shows that these technologies are not only self-operating problems, but also more risky for multi-technology integration.

Take the Ford-class aircraft carrier's most proud electromagnetic catapult technology, the US military put the electromagnetic catapult device to R&D and manufacture by General Atomics. However, the latter obviously has a hard time with this project. At present, the electromagnetic bomb is installed on the Ford class. The performance indicators of the system have been completely different from the levels originally stipulated in the contract. In the multiple system-wide tests of electromagnetic ejection, some serious problems were exposed. The idea that the electromagnetic ejection did not require more operators was also overturned, and it was necessary to re-establish more battle positions. At the same time, the previously preached electromagnetic catapult can accurately control the power output. In practice, it has also proved far more than the theoretical estimation that its huge ejection force sometimes cannot withstand even the F/A-18. Even more lethal is that its ejection system is difficult to repair in wartime, and the failure of a catapult to work will affect the work of the other three catapults. In other words, if a catapult is damaged, the Ford class will not be able to take off from the carrier aircraft. This is undoubtedly a fatal flaw.

In addition to the electromagnetic catapult, its all-electric propulsion proved to be altogether false. Because its all-electric system is prone to circuit failure, the first three "Ford" class aircraft carriers still use a steam turbine to directly propel 4-axis propellers. The subsequent changes will mainly depend on whether the U.S. military has captured the relevant technology.

All in all, it is normal for the aircraft carrier to have problems in the sea trials, especially for the Ford class with many advanced technologies. However, whether or not many new technologies are piled up is a reasonable development idea for aircraft carriers. It deserves the United States and is worthy of deep thinking in China. (Author's signature: Lei Bing / Zhang Yang)
 

Ang4MohTrump

Alfrescian
Loyal
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/wo...aircraft-carrier-breaks-down-navy-trump-putin

Trump’s supercarrier warship ‘BREAKS DOWN after being chased by Russian ship for TWO DAYS'

DONALD Trump's state-of-the-art supercarrier warship broke down while being chased by a 300ft-long Russian spy ship, a US Navy source claims.


facebook.png


twitter.png


googleplus.png


comments.png


share.png

324
By Joshua Nevett / Published 12th February 2018
A look at the US Navy's new £12 BILLION aircraft carrier
0:04
/
0:53


The USS Gerald R Ford – designed to make enemies "shake with fear" – had been tailed for two days by Russian intelligence gathering ship the Viktor Leonov.

The newest and most expensive class of US aircraft carrier had problems with its steering while being pursued off the east coast of the US, a source close to the Navy told Daily Star Online.

The £12.6bn ($17.5bn) CVN-21 class supercarrier was performing trials of its new systems at sea before returning to Naval Station Norfolk, Virginia, its homeport, at the end of January.

A missile-guided destroyer, the USS Cole, sent to track the Viktor Leonov was forced to intervene when the high-tech Russia spy ship sailed too close to the Ford, the source, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said.

It is understood the USS Cole was prompted to get in between the Ford and the Russian ship, whose crew has access to anti-aircraft missiles and turret cannons for last-resort self-defence.

Travelling at speeds in excess of 30 knots (35mph), the Ford was chased by the Cold War-era Russian boat for two days before heading back to Norfolk for repairs to its steering, the source said.

uss-gerald-ford-breaks-down-viktor-leonov-680948.jpg
GETTY

ALL AT SEA: The USS Gerald Ford is Donald Trump's newest and most expensive aircraft carrier
USS Gerald R. Ford: The MIGHTIEST aircraft carrier EVER built

The USS Gerald R. Ford is the first new aircraft carrier design in 40 years. This powerful addition to the US Navy is undergoing sea trials before it can be deployed
1 / 13
1016434.jpg
Getty Images
Sailors aboard the aircraft carrier Pre-Commissioning Unit (PCU) Gerald R. Ford (CVN 78) man the rails as the ship departs Huntington Ingalls Industries Newport News Shipbuilding for builder's sea trials off the U.S. East Coast
Fitted with sophisticated spy equipment that can intercept sensitive communications, the 300ft long Vishnya class vessel was taking pictures of the Ford during the pursuit, according to the source.

A spokesman for the US Fleet Forces Command told Daily Star Online the USS Cole was actively tracking and monitoring the Viktor Leonov's activities.

The spokesperson said USS Ford returned to port for "maintenance" on January 26 after training at sea, but disputed claims about the two-day pursuit and the mechanical failure.

As Washington seeks to reassert its military dominance over Moscow, the claims may prove embarrassing for the US Navy and Trump, who commissioned the Ford on July 22, 2017.

When Trump handed over the 1,106ft long, 250ft high aircraft carrier, he said the nuclear-powered ship will send a “100,000-tonne message to the world” about US military power.

uss-gerald-ford-1232820.jpg
GETTY

HOME PORT: USS Gerald R Ford arriving at Naval Station Norfolk in Virginia
Related Articles
Russian spy ship sails up US East Coast

“Russia sees itself already, effectively, at war.”

Kier Giles, a Russian military expert
Speaking at the commissioning ceremony at Naval Station Norfolk, Virginia, Trump said enemies of the US will “shake with fear” when they see the Ford looming into view.

“American is coming and America is coming strong,” he added, hailing the “American hands” and “American Steel” that made the 24-deck ship.

Yet his comments have not deterred the Russians, whose spy ship is understood to be conducting a four-to-six-month intelligence gathering operation off the US east coast.

One source familiar with the Ford incident has called on Trump to “confront” Russian president Vladimir Putin over the “aggressive” actions of the SSV-175 class vessel.

“Russia has been buzzing our ships a flying dangerously close to our aircraft and Trump appears to be doing nothing,” the source said.

“Something must be done.”

Vishnya-class-viktor-leonov-1232834.jpg
GETTY

SPY SHIP: Russian Vishnya, also known as Meridian, class warship CCB-175 Viktor Leonov
When told about the extraordinary claims, Kier Giles, a Russian military expert at the UK-based Chatham House think-tank, said aggressive maneuvering by a Russian ship “wouldn’t surprise me at all”.

Under Putin’s leadership, Russia has been “pushing the boundaries wherever it possibly can” since its annexation of Crimea in 2014, he told Daily Star Online.

He said Russia is reacting with “increasing urgency” to the perception that it is “actually already in a state of conflict with the US, NATO and the West in general in every domain except outright military combat”.

“They see themselves already, effectively, at war,” he added.

Interactions such as the stand-off between the Russian spy ship and the Ford are “just symptoms” of that perception of confrontation, he said.

donald-trump-uss-gerald-ford-1232810.jpg




 

Ang4MohTrump

Alfrescian
Loyal
https://taskandpurpose.com/uss-gerald-ford-navy-problems/

Bow_view_of_USS_Gerald_R._Ford_CVN-78_underway_on_8_April_2017-1-840x420.jpeg

Military Tech


The Navy’s Urinal-Free Brand New Supercarrier Is A Big Fat Mess

By Jared Keller
on February 13, 2018
T&P on Facebook



The Department of Defense’s fiscal year 2019 budget includes a hefty chunk of cash for a fourth Ford-class aircraft carrier, but the Navy may have to wait a little bit longer to see its dreams of an 11-carrier fleet truly realized.

Among the slew of vessels included in the Navy portion of President Donald Trump’s planned boost to the U.S. armed forces budget are three Arleigh Burke-class destroyers, two Virginia-class submarines, and the “first year of full funding” for the now-unnamed CVN 81 aircraft carrier, a younger sibling to the brand-new $13 billion USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN 78), which the Navy (and Trump) commissioned last July.

But as it turns out, the Pentagon’s latest technical assessment of the next-generation (and urinal-less) supercarrier reveals a warship currently incapable of performing basic functions during routine operations; the service on Feb. 7 reportedly appealed to Secretary of Defense James Mattis to delay critical shock testing of the new carriers until the second Ford-class hull, USS John F. Kennedy, comes available in 2024 — the same stress-testing for which lawmakers let the Navy off the hook in June 2017.


The DoD’s intensive assessment of the Ford, conducted by the Office of the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation and published last month, along with its other 2017 technical analyses, reveals “poor or unknown reliability” among many of the Ford’s essential systems, including newly designed catapults, arresting gear, weapons elevators, and radar.”
These systems aren’t just high-profile (see: that steamless catapult) but critical for the vessel’s roles in counterterrorism and great-power deterrence. “[The limitations] could affect the ability of CVN 78 to generate sorties, make the ship more vulnerable to attack, or create limitations during routine operations,” the report states. “The poor or unknown reliability of these critical subsystems is the most significant risk to CVN 78.”

Among the most glaring problems facing the vessel: those “goddamned” electromagnetic catapults. While the Boeing F/A-18F Super Hornet and EA-18G Growler aircraft experienced “excessive airframe stress” on launches, according to the DoD report, the Navy also “identified an inability to readily electrically isolate Electromagnetic Aircraft Launching System (EMALS) and Advanced Arresting Gear (AAG) components to perform maintenance” — a complication that means sailors could find themselves unable to perform underway maintenance or repairs on one of the ship’s most critical systems.

This isn’t just real pain in the ass when something goes wrong during a sustained bombing campaign against, say, forces hostile to U.S personnel downrange in Syria: It renders the whole system functionally useless. At the current reliability, Ford’s cats only have “a 9 percent chance of completing the 4-day surge and a 70 percent chance of completing a day of sustained operations as defined in the design reference mission without a critical failure.” That’s on a good day, with a deck full of trained-up sailors; the Ford class was designed to reduce manning requirements but is “sensitive to manpower fluctuations” simply because the next-generation technologies it embraces “are not well understood,” the report states

More concerning are the shock tests the Navy is delaying on the Ford, in which light charges would be set off in the water around the ship to test its systems’ reliance under stress. In recent years, DoD regulations stipulated that Full Ship Shock Trials, designed to test hull resiliency, are should be conducted at “two-thirds of the shock level that ships are required to survive”; the service’s push to delay even such nominal tests raises questions about officials’ confidence in their new supercarrier.

On the upside, Trump’s 2019 defense budget request contains around $1.8 billion for the “continued development” of Ford-class carrier technologies, as Defense News put it on Feb. 13. A few billion here, a few billion there — pretty soon, we’ll be talking about a working aircraft carrier.

Want to read more from Task & Purpose? Sign up for our daily newsletter »



Jared Keller is a senior editor at Task & Purpose and contributing editor at Pacific Standard. Follow Jared Keller on Twitter @JaredBKeller

[email protected]
 

Ang4MohTrump

Alfrescian
Loyal
https://www.popularmechanics.com/mi...-newest-aircraft-carrier-suffers-a-breakdown/

America’s Newest Aircraft Carrier Suffers a Breakdown

It’s the second breakdown in a year for the USS Ford’s propulsion system.

bf2f096f-4d0a-456b-a131-44babf768632.jpg

By Kyle Mizokami
May 9, 2018
372



gettyimages-666333580-1525807056.jpg

Getty Images

The U.S. Navy’s newest aircraft carrier suffered a propulsion issue in January 2018 that forced it to return to port early from sea trials. The USS Gerald R. Ford experienced an issue with the main thrust bearing that was the result of a manufacturing defect. Both the U.S. Navy and shipbuilder Huntington Ingalls Industries are looking into the problem.

The USS Ford was on a shakedown cruise designed to detect issues in the brand-new ship. According to a Navy memo obtained by Bloomberg News, while the ship was underway the crew and engineers observed a temperature of "92 degrees Fahrenheit above the bearing temperature setpoint."

The main thrust bearings on ships are designed to take thrust generated by the propellers and move the ship in the direction of the thrust. A carrier such as the USS Ford, which has four propellers, in turn has four main thrust bearings. As one might expect with a 90,000 ton, nuclear-powered vessel, this is a juncture of machinery that must safely transfer enormous levels of energy, and heat buildup was detected before something dangerous could happen.

According to the memo, “after securing the equipment to prevent damage, the ship safely returned to port." Another problem involving main thrust bearings took place in April 2017.

Huntington Ingalls declined to state which contractor was at fault for the defective parts, but Bloomberg noted that General Electric was responsible for the Ford’s propulsion system. Bloomberg also noted that an inspection of the parts involved in the January 2018 incident revealed improperly machined gears at GE’s facility in Lynn, Massachusetts as the “root cause."

A spokesperson for GE said that the company no longer produces gears for the USS Ford, which begs the question of when the problem could be fixed. The parts are reportedly "out of spec," and would either need to be repaired and brought back into spec or replaced with properly machined parts.

The USS Ford is the most expensive warship in history, costing $12.6 billion in construction and another $4.7 billion in research and development. The Ford was built with a number of new technologies onboard, including an electromagnetic aircraft launch system, advanced aircraft landing system, and new radar.

All new ships undergo problems, and Ford’s shakedown period is doing exactly what it is supposed to. A first in class ship using new technology, Ford has had more than its share of issues. According to a spokesman for Navy Sea Systems Command, the organization overseeing the shakedown cruise, the problems will be fixed during the “post-shakedown availability” phase, during which improvements are made while the ship is in drydock.
 

Ang4MohTrump

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://foreignpolicy.com/2017/09/14...ered-as-the-doomed-yamato-of-the-carrier-era/

Will the USS Gerald Ford be remembered as the doomed Yamato of the carrier era?
What matters most is not how lethal a carrier is, but what threats it can endure.
By Thomas E. Ricks | September 14, 2017, 10:45 AM
yamato1945.png





By Dan Nidess
Best Defense guest columnist

Commissioned by the Japanese in December of 1941, just over a week after their surprise attack on Pearl Harbor, the Yamato was the largest, most powerful battleship that had ever existed — a title that it still holds to this day, over 75 years later. With its nine 18.1-inch guns, it could fire 3,000 pound shells up to 26 miles away — so far that it required spotter aircraft to identify targets over the horizon. In comparison, the heaviest guns on U.S. battleships were 16 inches and limited to a maximum range of 20 miles. To paraphrase President Trump, it was truly a ship to make its enemies shake with fear.

While the Yamato was the pinnacle of the battleship era, the recently commissioned USS Gerald Ford represents the state of the art of what came next — the era of naval aviation and, crucially, the aircraft carrier. At 1,100 feet long and displacing over 100,000 tons, the Ford is a massive ship. However, while what distinguished the Yamato from its peers was the size of the ship and its cannons, what distinguishes the Ford are its technological improvements. Of roughly similar size and speed as the previous Nimitz class of supercarriers, Ford’s advantage comes, in part, from its increased efficiency. Advances in design allow it to launch 25 percent more sorties per day, greatly increasing its striking power. It also operates with at least 20 percent fewer crew members due to improved automation.

The Ford is adding to an existing fleet of 10 Nimitz class supercarriers. These are joined by an additional nine amphibious assault ships that, while much smaller and with more limited capabilities, are still capable of launching a range of helicopters and vertical takeoff and landing fixed wing aircraft. By comparison, the rest of the world’s major navies have one to two carriers either in service or under construction. The outlier is Japan with three. And almost all of these are closer in size and aircraft complement to our amphibious assault ships than to our supercarriers. In short, when it comes to the ability to project naval airpower, the United States so far outpaces the rest of the world that there is no comparison.

However, aircraft carriers are facing ever greater threats with each passing year. Everything from advances in technology, to tactics, to the changing environment of naval warfare is increasing the threat to our carrier fleet.

Part of the problem is technical and a natural progression of the same factors that led to the prominence of naval airpower over naval cannons. Just as the range of carrier-based fighters allowed them to engage battleships long before those battleships were in range of the carrier, anti-ship missile technology has greatly outpaced the range of carrier-based fighters. The other is the decreasing size of the threat. Part of the problem that battleships ran into was that they were optimized to strike large targets that were relatively few in numbers — other warships. Even though battleships on both sides were outfitted with anti-aircraft guns, they were only marginally effective at dealing with attacks by small, fast moving aircraft. While modern carriers and their escorts field a range of weapons to defend against conventional naval and air forces, the threat is again shrinking. The U.S. Navy is currently experimenting with miniature drones; unfortunately, so are the Chinese.

The second aspect of the threat is tactical. Part of the dilemma for battleships was not just that the size and the speed of fighters made them difficult to shoot down, but the sheer numbers that they faced overwhelmed their defenses, even though they often sported well over a hundred anti-aircraft guns each by the end of the war. Similarly, our carriers must anticipate a future threat environment that will be characterized by massive barrages, whether of cruise and ballistic missiles, swarms of micro-drones, subsurface drones, speedboat borne IEDs, or some combination — that seek to overwhelm escorts’ ability to engage. This will be made even more dangerous by the potential for coordinated cyberattacks to degrade or neutralize their tracking, targeting, and other operations.

Finally, all of this is compounded by the geography of modern naval conflict. “Blue water” engagements largely limit the number of missiles, torpedoes, launchers, and aircraft that a belligerent can bring to the fight and the number of ships that they have to mount them on. The U.S. Navy’s absolute dominance in this domain has led potential adversaries to mostly give up the idea of fighting us in the major oceans. This has pushed the location of potential naval conflicts much closer to our adversaries’ shores – to their advantage. Whether in the Straits of Hormuz or the South China Sea, the proximity to land gives our enemies the ability to offset their numerical inferiority in ships with large numbers of shore-based launchers, fighters, drones, and speedboats. These forces’ survivability is improved by hardening or mounting on small, mobile platforms. Drawing our naval forces into more confined waters also reduces a factor key to their survivability — the ability to evade detection and targeting.

Just as naval forces have developed increasingly effective countermeasures to aerial threats, our fleet is going to require new defenses for the 21st century. Weapons capable of tracking and targeting ever-smaller threats and engaging them in ever-greater numbers will be critical. Directed energy weapons, such as those already being deployed, are promising. Just as drones threaten to overwhelm conventional defenses, they may also be part of the solution. Networked swarms of miniature drones can serve as a modern, smart version of traditional flak – creating a cloud of interceptors in the path of anti-ship missiles, torpedoes, or drones. Electronic warfare will play a critical role in disrupting threats’ targeting and navigation.

Perhaps the most important measure will be aimed not so much at the survivability of carriers themselves, but at preserving their embarked air wing. Supercarriers offer tremendous economies of scale by allowing a large number of aircraft to be transported and operated from a single platform. However, that also inextricably links the survivability of the battle group’s entire air wing to the fate of a single ship. With the growing number of threats to carriers, it may make more sense to spread the air wing across two or three smaller carriers. This would ensure that an attack that successfully sinks or disables one of our carriers does not also cripple the entire air wing.
 

Ang4MohTrump

Alfrescian
Loyal
USS Gerald Ford got BIG Toilet Problem = Can Lao Sai can not Pang Jio!



https://www.businessinsider.sg/us-n...carrier-doesnt-have-urinals-2017-7/?r=US&IR=T


The Navy’s newest, most sophisticated aircraft carrier doesn’t have urinals

Christopher Woody, Business Insider US
July 24, 2017
AddThis Sharing Buttons
Share to FacebookFacebookShare to TwitterTwitterShare to LinkedInLinkedInShare to EmailEmailShare to PrintPrint
57963e9b88e4a7f4328ba4e8.jpg

The aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford in Dry Dock 12 at Newport News Shipbuilding.
US Navy


Amid all its upgrades and advances, the US Navy’s newest aircraft carrier, the USS Gerald R. Ford, is lacking one feature: urinals.

Every bathroom on the Ford is, for the first time, gender-neutral, equipped with flush toilets and stalls, according to Navy Times.

Bathroom-design experts have said sit-down toilets are less sanitary and take up more space, and most of the Ford’s crew members are men. (Women are only about 18% of the Navy.)


But the Navy has said getting rid of urinals has advantages for current and future operations.


Making every bathroom accessible to all of the ship’s sailors will make things more convenient for sailors, the Navy has said. And bathrooms that can be used by either gender mean the Navy can reassign them without making any design changes, should the crew’s makeup change.

“This is designed to give the ship flexibility because there aren’t any berthing areas that are dedicated to one sex or the other,” Operations Specialist 1st Class Kaylea Motsenbocker told Navy Times. “So if this space was needed for males, we could shift the females to other berthing areas and make this all male without any modification being necessary.”

5975f0f1552be51d008b6017.jpg


Sailors man the rails of the aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN 78) during its commissioning ceremony at Naval Station Norfolk, Virginia, July 22, 2017. Ford is the lead ship of the Ford-class aircraft carriers, and the first new US aircraft carrier designed in 40 years.
US Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Julio Martinez Martinez
Other changes include redesigned sleeping areas with fewer beds in each room, different spaces for sleeping and recreation, wider passageways, better gyms, better air conditioning, and more efficient light bulbs. USB ports have been installed to make it easier for sailors to charge cellphones and other devices.

Beyond the bathrooms, the Ford – which is the first Ford-class aircraft carrier – has 23 new or modified technologies.

The ship’s island is smaller and farther back on the flight deck, allowing more space for air operations. Inside, the traditional throttle system has been switched out for an updated, one-of-a-kind touch-screen display. “This ship can basically drive itself,” Petty Officer 1st Class Jose Triana told CNN.

In addition to carrying more aircraft, the Ford will also use the Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System rather than steam power used on Nimitz-class ships. The EMALS system is designed to offer more control and precision when launching aircraft and will be used despite President Donald Trump’s vocal objection earlier this year.

The EMALS system is also part of the Ford’s switch to electrical power. The ship will be able to produce three times as much power as Nimitz-class ships, and the Navy has said replacing steam-powered systems with electrical ones will open space for future technologies.

5588413f6da8113541adf0f6.jpg


The aircraft carrier Gerald R. Ford (CVN 78) gets underway, beginning the ship’s launch and transit to Newport News Shipyard pier 3 for the final stages of construction and testing.
US Navy/Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Aidan P. Campbell
Flight operations will also use the Advanced Arresting Gear system to recover aircraft. The AAG system will allow Ford-class ships to work with air systems that Nimitz-class ships are not interoperable with.

The Ford’s roughly 40 fuel stations are more than on any Nimitz-class ship and allow for fueling from multiple places on the ship with fewer personnel. The ship’s dual-band radar works on two frequencies at the same time. It can pick up low-altitude objects and track both incoming and outgoing aircraft and weapons.

Ford-class carriers will also use electromagnetic fields to raise and lower platforms instead of cables, saving space and reducing maintenance and personnel requirements over time.

All these advances and upgrades have presented challenges to the Navy and to the sailors who will man the Ford. The ship’s first crew members have more or less written the book on how to operate it.

“We’re creating guidelines,” Triana told the Associated Press this month. “Were creating operational – basically instructions – on how to operate this ship with its systems and its new design.”

5976021d552be5a7088b5fd5.jpg


Chief Yeoman Berwyn Tinnion, assigned to the aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN 78), sings the national anthem during the ship’s commissioning ceremony at Naval Station Norfolk, Virginia, July 22, 2017.
(US Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Gitte Schirrmacher/Released)
“We have, no doubt, without question, subject-matter experts on these new systems,” Capt. Brent Gaut, the Ford’s executive officer, told the AP. “They’ve been training on them for upwards of two, three years now. There’s no one else in the fleet that has some of the systems we have. They are the go-to personnel on how to operate and how to execute with the new systems that we have.”

The new and updated technology poured into the Ford have caused trouble for the Navy during the ship’s construction and development.

“With the benefit of hindsight, it was clearly premature to include so many unproven technologies” in the Ford, according to an August 23 memo to Navy Secretary Ray Mabus. The Ford’s new dual-band radar and some components of its new, more powerful nuclear reactor also encountered problems during the ship’s development.

While the Ford is now ready to ply the seas, Navy commanders appear to be cautious about repeating the technological leaps taken with the ship. In addition to problems with the launching and arresting systems, the $12.9 billion warship also experienced budget overruns and scheduling delays.

While the Ford passed builder’s trials this spring, it did not undergo shock trials – where the Navy detonates explosives near the ship to test its ability to withstand the strain. The Navy’s first-in-class ships don’t always face shock trials, however, and the next ship in the class, the USS John F. Kennedy, will do them.

55883fb9ecad0491665310fd.jpg


U.S. Navy/Huntington Ingalls Industries/Chris Oxley
“When we look back, the Ford took on some major goals for ourselves, some real reach goals in terms of technology. And so as we look forward to designing and building ships of the future, particularly given how quickly technology is advancing, maybe we take smaller steps,” Adm. John Richardson, the Navy’s chief of naval operations, told USNI News prior to the Ford’s commissioning this weekend.

“Instead of something that will deliver in 15 or 20 years, we do something that will deliver in five years, and then we do five years after that,” Richardson added, “and we sort of take smaller steps to arrive at the technology and capability curve and deliver with more confidence and on budget, on schedule.”

Two more Ford-class carriers are in the works. The John F. Kennedy “is well along in construction,” according to the Navy, and work has started on the USS Enterprise. The three Ford-class carriers will join 10 Nimitz-class carriers already in service.

“With all new technology there are risks,” Capt. Richard McCormack, the Ford’s commanding officer, said. “But that’s why we’re here – to go out there and shake them down.”
 

tanwahtiu

Alfrescian
Loyal
Told you angmohs are fat beer belly stupid idiots when come to technologies.

Look at internet. So many flaws in codings and hacking even a 10 yr old Pinoy boy can hack the internet.
 

tanwahtiu

Alfrescian
Loyal
False flag... Sam will say AMDK breakdown is normal like exercises...



http://mil.news.sina.com.cn/jssd/2018-05-12/doc-ihamfahx1385080.shtml

美军这艘全球最强航母真实战力成疑:海试中返港维修
美军这艘全球最强航母真实战力成疑:海试中返港维修

0
  近日,据美国媒体报道,此前出海海试的美国福特级航母提前返港,有消息称,福特级此时返回,是因为在海试期间,被查出“制造缺陷”和“不当指令”而临时决定尽快返港维修,这不是福特级第一次海试出现问题,此前,就在2018年1月,福特级也是在海试中出现问题而被迫返港维修。作为美军最先进,同时也是世界最前卫的福特级航母,频频海试出现问题,让外界对其的真实战力产生了疑问。

wwmS-hamfahx1345538.jpg

  福特级航母造价129亿美元,长度为333米,可搭载75架各型号飞机,与此同时,福特级还使用了最新的电磁弹射技术以及其他美军最新的科研成果,而这也成为了福特级问题重重的根由。福特级航母项目启动很早,早在上世纪90年代,精确的说,是1996年就已经开始,距今22年。福特级的设计就是要成为尼米兹级航空母舰的升级版,在福特级身上要使用最新的电磁弹射,最新的核反应堆以及最新的全电系统等等,可以说,福特级不是尼米兹级的升级版,其完全是跨代的作品。由于技术要求太高,原本打算2013年11月下水的福特级航母,一直等到了4年后的2017年才艰难下水,正当美国为此欢欣鼓舞时,福特级种种问题的报出为福特的前途蒙上了阴影。

C6T1-hamfahx1345559.jpg

  为何福特号问题重重得不到根本解决?归根结底,是由于其技术过于先进,从而导致应用性不足。福特号航母采用了诸多新技术,电磁弹射技术、核动力技术、先进拦阻技术以及隐身舰载战斗机等等,这些新技术成熟度较差,在美军评估中,多项关键技术的低于7级,这表明这些技术不仅自运行问题重重,多技术融合更具有较大的风险。

  就拿福特级航母最为得意的电磁弹射技术来讲,美军将电磁弹射装置交由通用原子公司进行研发制造,然而后者明显在这一项目上倍感吃力,目前福特级上安装到位的电磁弹射系统的性能指标已经和当初合同规定的水平完全不同。在电磁弹射的多次全系统测试中,暴露出了一些严重的问题。此前认为电磁弹射无需更多操作人员的设想也被推翻,不得已又重新设置更多的战位。与此同时,此前鼓吹的电磁弹射可以精确控制力量输出,实践中也证明远超理论估计,其巨大的弹射力有时候连F/A-18都承受不住。更为致命的是,其弹射系统在战时难以维修,并且一台弹射器无法工作将影响其他3台弹射器的工作。也就是说,一台弹射器损坏,福特级将无法进行舰载机起飞作业,这无疑是致命的缺陷。

_Tni-hamfahx1345584.jpg

  除了电磁弹射器,其鼓吹的全电推进也证明是子虚乌有,由于其全电系统易引发电路故障,因此,前3艘“福特”级航母依旧使用蒸汽涡轮直接驱动4轴螺旋桨推进。 后续有何变化,主要看美军是否攻克了相关技术。

  总而言之,航母海试出现问题很正常,尤其是采用诸多先进技术的福特级。但是,诸多新技术的堆砌,是否是一型航母合理的发展思路,值得美国,也值得我国深思。(作者署名:利刃/张阳)



The true strength of the U.S. military, the world’s most powerful carrier, is doubtful: returning to the harbor during the sea trials
The true strength of the U.S. military, the world’s most powerful carrier, is doubtful: returning to the harbor during the sea trials
0

Recently, according to U.S. media reports, the US Ford class aircraft carrier that went to sea trials earlier returned to Hong Kong in advance. According to sources, the Ford class returned at this time because during the sea trial, it was found that "manufacture defects" and "improper instructions" were detected. The temporary decision to return to Hong Kong as soon as possible was not the first time the Ford-class sea trial had a problem. Prior to this, in January 2018, the Ford class was forced to return to Hong Kong for maintenance because of problems in the sea trials. As the most advanced and at the same time the most advanced Ford class aircraft carrier in the US military, frequent sea trial problems have caused questions about the true combat capabilities of the outside world.

The Ford class aircraft carrier costs $12.9 billion and its length is 333 meters. It can carry 75 aircraft of various types. At the same time, the Ford grade also uses the latest electromagnetic ejection technology and other US military's latest scientific research results, and this has also become Ford. The root cause of the problem. The Ford aircraft carrier project started very early, as early as the 1990s, to be precise, it was started in 1996, 22 years ago. The Ford-class design is to become an upgraded version of the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier. To use the latest electromagnetic missiles on the Ford class, the latest nuclear reactor and the latest all-electric system, etc., it can be said that the Ford grade is not Nimitz-class. The upgraded version is completely cross-generational. Due to high technical requirements, the Ford aircraft carrier, which was originally scheduled to launch in November 2013, has waited until 4 years after its launch in 2017. As the United States rejoices, Ford’s problems are reported as Ford’s future. Shadowed.

Why is the problem of Ford's number not being solved fundamentally? In the final analysis, it is due to its advanced technology, which results in insufficient application. The Ford aircraft carrier uses many new technologies, including electromagnetic ejection technology, nuclear power technology, advanced anti-blocking technology, and stealth ship-based fighter aircraft. These new technologies have poor maturity, and many key technologies are lower than Level 7 in the US military evaluation. This shows that these technologies are not only self-operating problems, but also more risky for multi-technology integration.

Take the Ford-class aircraft carrier's most proud electromagnetic catapult technology, the US military put the electromagnetic catapult device to R&D and manufacture by General Atomics. However, the latter obviously has a hard time with this project. At present, the electromagnetic bomb is installed on the Ford class. The performance indicators of the system have been completely different from the levels originally stipulated in the contract. In the multiple system-wide tests of electromagnetic ejection, some serious problems were exposed. The idea that the electromagnetic ejection did not require more operators was also overturned, and it was necessary to re-establish more battle positions. At the same time, the previously preached electromagnetic catapult can accurately control the power output. In practice, it has also proved far more than the theoretical estimation that its huge ejection force sometimes cannot withstand even the F/A-18. Even more lethal is that its ejection system is difficult to repair in wartime, and the failure of a catapult to work will affect the work of the other three catapults. In other words, if a catapult is damaged, the Ford class will not be able to take off from the carrier aircraft. This is undoubtedly a fatal flaw.

In addition to the electromagnetic catapult, its all-electric propulsion proved to be altogether false. Because its all-electric system is prone to circuit failure, the first three "Ford" class aircraft carriers still use a steam turbine to directly propel 4-axis propellers. The subsequent changes will mainly depend on whether the U.S. military has captured the relevant technology.

All in all, it is normal for the aircraft carrier to have problems in the sea trials, especially for the Ford class with many advanced technologies. However, whether or not many new technologies are piled up is a reasonable development idea for aircraft carriers. It deserves the United States and is worthy of deep thinking in China. (Author's signature: Lei Bing / Zhang Yang)
 

swine_flu_H1H1

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://k.sina.cn/article_6434062307...t=0&rfunc=0&tj=none&wm=INNER001&http=fromhttp

辽宁舰内部独家曝光 可能一会就被删

有勇气就奇迹
02月08日13:09 关注
辽宁舰内部独家曝光 可能一会就被删

说出来吓死你,

辽宁舰可是有20多层

3000多个舱室:

c221-fyqzcxh3466371.jpg


1000多人生活在里面:

1e7c-fyqzcxh3466957.jpg


光航母内部的通道加起来

总长度就有数十公里

a5b4-fyqzcxh3467017.jpg


这是什么概念?

如果一名刚出生的婴儿,

每天换一间舱室居住

2270-fyqzcxh3467054.jpg


当他住遍辽宁舰所有舱室,

他已经10岁了

f2f2-fyqzcxh3467090.jpg


而且这里还有餐厅、洗衣房、健身房、邮局、超市等等几百间不同房间

57a0-fyqzcxh3467226.jpg


想登舰,首先就要过安检:

c19c-fyqzcxh3467293.jpg


每个人都有自己的身份牌,

还有专人在这里检查

混肯定是混不过去的:

0f76-fyqzcxh3467370.jpg


如果官兵衣服脏了,

可以放进洗衣机里清洗:

3820-fyqzcxh3470353.jpg


而且还配备烘干机,

消毒完以后再拿出来:

c7d7-fyqzcxh3467649.jpg


往里面走

就能看到图书馆:

8cd6-fyqzcxh3467683.jpg


闲着没事还能看看书

fdaa-fyqzcxh3467739.jpg


看看这种卧室小包间:

一般都是军官才能住

e91e-fyqzcxh3467812.jpg


有配套卫生间:

7654-fyqzcxh3467867.jpg


电视随便看:

504e-fyqzcxh3467892.jpg


因为海上比较颠簸,

杯子都得这样架着:

0d57-fyqzcxh3467911.jpg


而女兵的卧室就比较私密了:

963b-fyqzcxh3467935.jpg


生活过得比较滋润,

房间里还配小电脑:

7882-fyqzcxh3467948.jpg


一般都是四个人一起住:

e36e-fyqzcxh3467994.jpg


连出个门都要打卡:

fb14-fyqzcxh3468026.jpg
 

swine_flu_H1H1

Alfrescian
Loyal
ccdc-fyqzcxh3468061.jpg


想买点吃的怎么办?

辽宁舰上有超市,

啥都有得买:

fa15-fyqzcxh3468119.jpg


而且这种超市还有五六个:

5517-fyqzcxh3468174.jpg


那没钱怎么办?

辽宁舰上还有ATM:

b16a-fyqzcxh3468205.jpg


再不行的话,这里还有邮局:

寄个几箱泡面应该没问题

80b6-fyqzcxh3468247.jpg


除了这些,

辽宁舰居然还有电视台:

caf9-fyqzcxh3468272.jpg


不知道看辽宁舰新闻

是种什么感觉:

fcdd-fyqzcxh3468322.jpg


这里还有健身房:

48af-fyqzcxh3468349.jpg


头发长了也有理发室:

2fc0-fyqzcxh3468377.jpg


平时娱乐可以

自己弹个吉他:

eafb-fyqzcxh3468411.jpg


跟大伙跳只舞:

1c3a-fyqzcxh3468449.jpg


生病啥的还有医疗室:

a5e5-fyqzcxh3468493.jpg


70d6-fyqzcxh3468529.jpg


不愧是海上城堡

真是什么都有

4373-fyqzcxh3468563.jpg


但航母上最厉害的

还不是这些

那是?

航母上单单餐厅,

就有十几个

有这样的:

893d-fyqzcxh3468578.jpg


还有这样的:

4470-fyqzcxh3468600.jpg


以及这样的:

a0f2-fyqzcxh3468628.jpg


中餐师、面点师全都有:

eef6-fyqzcxh3468656.jpg


早上烤个新鲜面包:

fc0d-fyqzcxh3468678.jpg


75c3-fyqzcxh3468704.jpg


中午吃个热腾腾米饭:

8e5d-fyqzcxh3468719.jpg


晚上还有各式甜品:

09c2-fyqzcxh3468749.jpg


休假回家的官兵

还可以领到舰上的特产

——“航母小厨”两盒

05d4-fyqzcxh3468772.jpg


真是吃不完还要兜着走

1ebb-fyqzcxh3468790.jpg


吃得真是开心:

f3bb-fyqzcxh3468803.jpg


f6df-fyqzcxh3468819.jpg


这真是太丰富了!

内景我们看完了,

再感受下外景:

9755-fyqzcxh3468849.jpg


舰上有24架歼-15战斗机

这可是飞机中的战斗机:

e8a2-fyqzcxh3468911.gif


舰上的其他武器也是屌炸天

比如说它:

每分钟可以发射10000发

0f81-fyqzcxh3468972.gif


比如说它:

十公里以内都能炸成灰

52c1-fyrhcqz4345231.jpg


辽宁舰装配时

好些人累死在岗位

7da2-fyqzcxh3469187.jpg


训练时累死过指挥员,

牺牲过飞行员

e73c-fyqzcxh3469253.jpg


短短四年,

已经形成了实战能力

3878-fyqzcxh3469310.jpg


还有这么一群人:

8cb5-fyqzcxh3469427.jpg


这个简单的“走你”姿势

看似普通

3cb6-fyqzcxh3469499.jpg


但起飞时喷出的尾焰

温度能达到1800度,

能把一个人轻易融掉

只有他们无怨无悔在付出

6d58-fyqzcxh3469566.gif


这个“海上城市”的每一个人,

都承担着一份重要的责任

b7d9-fyqzcxh3469647.jpg


那就是为和平而坚守!

f6d7-fyqzcxh3469748.jpg


特别声明
特别声明:以上文章内容仅代表作者本人观点,不代表新浪看点观点或立场。如有关于作品内容、版权或其它问题请于作品发布后的30日内与新浪看点联系。
 
Top