• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

MAGA Dotard caused entire world to switch side towards China

Ang4MohTrump

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/leaders/2018-05/25/c_1122890071.htm

习近平会见法国前总统奥朗德
2018-05-25 20:52:50 来源: 新华网

关注学习进行时
微信
微博
Qzone
1122890071_15272528328231n.jpg


  5月25日,国家主席习近平在北京钓鱼台国宾馆会见法国前总统奥朗德。新华社记者 庞兴雷 摄





https://www.rt.com/op-ed/427765-merkel-germany-china-iran/

Sick & tired of US foreign policy, Germany is pushed into the open arms of China

Darius Shahtahmasebi is a New Zealand-based attorney and political analyst.
Published time: 25 May, 2018 12:21 Edited time: 25 May, 2018 14:26
Get short URL
5b07f242fc7e934b358b457d.jpg

China's President Xi Jinping (R) meets German Chancellor Angela Merkel at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, China, May 24, 2018. © Jason Lee / Reuters
  • 4873
  • 11
Germany has had enough of American foreign policy. Angela Merkel’s visits to Russia and China are a testament to that.
On May 10, 2018, German Chancellor Angela Merkel openly said that Europe can no longer count on the United States to protect it, hinting that the European continent would begin to “take destiny into its own hands.

The comments were, of course, a direct reference to US President Donald Trump’s ludicrous but anticipated decision to completely nuke the Iranian nuclear accord, also known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).

It is no longer such that the United States simply protects us, but Europe must take its destiny in its own hands. That's the task of the future," Merkel reportedly said during a speech honoring French President Emmanuel Macron.

Read more
Trump vows to ‘deal with’ Germany & other NATO allies ‘not contributing enough’
Eerily enough, approximately a year ago, Merkel offered almost the exact same sentiments, stating that Europe “really must take our fate into our own hands.

In the weeks since, Merkel has certainly proved that this was no idle threat. The German chancellor has made trips to both Russia and China, and the outcomes of those meetings appear to suggest a complete restructuring of the balance of power in Europe and Asia respectively.

China and Germany see eye to eye
Just this Thursday, China has already said it wouldopen its door wider” to German businesses after giving Merkel a warm reception. Both China and Germany have a common interest in defeating Trump’s plan to kill trade surpluses that countries have with the United States, as they are both equally affected by Trump’s threats. Each time Trump opens his mouth, it seems that European and Asian businesses are instantly affected. Germany is the largest auto exporter to the US out of any European country, and is China’s biggest European trading partner which was worth $179 billion just last year alone.

Both Merkel and Macron tried their hand at persuading the Trump administration not to abandon the Iranian nuclear deal completely. The leaders even issued a joint statement with British Prime Minister Theresa May, someone whose hawkish attitude towards Iran should not go unnoticed. Not surprisingly, according to Reuters, German officials have said that “Trump’s America First’ trade policy, his administration’s professed disdain for the World Trade Organization, as well as his withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal, have pushed China and Germany into closer alignment.

Read more
Selfish US diktats could push Europe to develop ties with Russia, China & Iran
It is not clear if the Trump administration is that incompetent or if this is done on purpose, in full knowledge that its actions will only further isolate the United States on the world stage and push states that previously held more adversarial positions closer and closer together. If it is done on purpose, one has to wonder what sort of mindset is behind the leadership which is on a self-destruct mission, and how it expects to maintain its worldwide empire, all the while irking its traditional allies. It is quite clear that Trump’s decision to axe the Iran deal will only pave the way for China to take advantage of the financial opportunities flowing out of Iran if sanctions present a buffer to German interests. China has already been assisting Iran to out-maneuver US-led sanctions through, for example, the use of credit lines using the Yuan.

In that context, does Donald Trump want to contain China or empower it? You can only go so far serving the interests of Saudi Arabia and Israel while ignoring strong European states who would rather ink financial deals than turn Iran into a glass crater, a strong point of difference between Merkel and say, newly appointed US national security adviser John Bolton.

The lifting of sanctions on Iran already led to an increase in trade between Germany and Iran from €2.7 billion in 2014 to €3.5 billion last year. It is also worth noting that Iran will now start accepting euros for its oil in an attempt to not only avoid the US dollar, but in a move that will directly threaten it. This topic is probably best suited for another article, but it is definitely something worth keeping an eye on – and will most likely only bolster Germany’s resolve to protect Iran.

Either way, Germany and China have both agreed to stick to the Iran deal. Think for a second what this means: John Bolton openly warned European companies and countries against continuing business with Iran, stating that they could be targeted by sanctions. The newly appointed ambassador to Germany, Richard Grenell, also immediately warned Germany directly that German companies must halt their business activities with Tehran or face sanctions. The German-Chinese announcement also came just after Iran’s leader, Ayatollah Khamenei, issued a set of demands of its own, stating that the Europeans also could not be trusted.

Germany and China have essentially given the US the political middle finger in response, and arguably kowtowed to Iranian interests instead.

Read more
82% of Germans believe US is unreliable partner – poll
German-Russian relations to continue
Not too long ago, the US also warned Germany that sanctions may also target the German-Russia pipeline known as the Nord Stream 2 Project. If you ever needed proof that the underlying reasons for US-led wars were driven by money and natural gas, this is it. Why prevent Germany and Russia from working on this monumental project? Germany needs the gas, and Russia, relatively close-by, can supply it.

Despite the fact that the two countries continue to hold a number of disputes (including sanctions that continue to target Russia), Merkel’s meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin demonstrates that it is still possible to meet with one’s counterpart and discuss those issues amicably, an idea that seems almost completely lost on the current Trump administration.

If you want to solve problems, you have to talk to each other,” Merkel said alongside Putin midway through the talks.

One Russian presidential aide reportedly suggested that the meeting went ahead because the two world leaders now found themselves on the same page, stating that “when opinions coincide, then countries at the very least become a bit closer to one another.”

According to a senior German official with knowledge of the chancellery’s strategy, rapprochement with Russia is now a core policy objective in Berlin. Polls are already suggesting that Germans trust Russia under Putin more than they trust the United States under Trump. That is some amazing 4D chess President Trump is playing.

READ MORE: Trump’s withdrawal from Iran nuclear deal gives Europe a choice: Become vassals or be independent

It is also worth noting that Germany did not participate in Trump, Macron, and Theresa May’s grandiose attack on Syria in April this year. Perhaps Germany is seeing less and less in common with the US, and has less of an intention of waging war to see its interests met, unlike the US, which apparently sees violence as the logical solution to all its problems.

Not to mention that – agitating Germany even further – in a recent cabinet meeting in Washington attended by NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, Trump singled out Germany as a country not contributing enough, all the while warning that countries allegedly not paying their dues will be “dealt with.”

Sheez. It should be no wonder that in this context, Germany has been secretly building a European Army of its own, already announcing the integration of its armed forces with Romania and the Czech Republic, baby steps to creating a European army under German leadership.
 

syed putra

Alfrescian
Loyal
Iran is a victim of arab and american aggression. Remember iran iraq war? When saddam who was on the US side invaded iran, shot scud missiles filled with poison gas and iran, due to sanctions imposed after ransacking the US embassy and holding the staff there hostage have nothing much to defend its territory with. So now they have built their own missiles.
 

whoami

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
This idiot Dotard attention seeker! He will go against all of Obama policies domestic or foreign. He just want his name in history. He simply bulldoze like one mad swine!
 

Ang4MohTrump

Alfrescian
Loyal
This idiot Dotard attention seeker! He will go against all of Obama policies domestic or foreign. He just want his name in history. He simply bulldoze like one mad swine!


Dotard is the most worthless piece of shit ever in political history of the world. His MAGA did America in the most deeply. Big Big Time. Perfect for Ending Phase of USA's superpower status.
 

Ang4MohTrump

Alfrescian
Loyal
https://tw.news.yahoo.com/美國-知華派-第-人-剖析陸美台三角關係-藍普頓示警-川普的無知終將傷害台灣-215012493.html



美國「知華派」第一人 剖析陸美台三角關係!藍普頓示警 川普的無知終將傷害台灣

中時電子報

7.3k 人追蹤
駐美特派員 江靜玲╱華府專訪
2018年5月28日 上午5:50
中國時報【駐美特派員 江靜玲╱華府專訪】

國際知名中國研究權威、美國約翰霍普金斯大學高級國際問題研究學院教授藍普頓(David Lampton)表示,美國和中國大陸關係已過了臨界點(Tipping point),美陸關係不致出現急劇突落,但雙邊關係持續滑落將是令人憂心的事。

藍普頓是美國知名的中國問題專家,在中國外交學院《知華派評估報告》排名第一,他接受《中國時報》獨家專訪時,做了以上表述。他同時指出,在美陸關係中,台灣是一個非常大的考量因素,美陸關係緊張時,美國和台灣就有人趁機想增加台灣有利地位。川普執政以來,台灣已成為越來越被「考慮」的議題,但這可能是危險的。以下為訪談記要。

問:您在2015年指出,美陸關係接近臨界點,美國精英階層越來越把中國大陸視為對美國主導權的威脅,大陸則認為美國阻止中國發展,現在美陸關係是否到了這個臨界點?我們離開懸崖還有多遠?

陸美關係 大國競爭新時代

答:我們已經過了那個臨界點。證據可從川普政府的3個文件看到:新國家安全戰略,把大陸明確定位為「競爭對手」;國防戰略報告,清楚點明大陸推動政策與美國國家利益和價值相抵觸,宣布我們進入大國競爭新時代;核態勢評估報告,基本上清楚表明,我們不僅在傳統武器上與大陸競逐,在核武的現代化亦如此。接著,我們看到了習近平在2017年10月十九大中宣布中國大陸的新時代,把大陸推到新時代舞台中心。綜合這些,我會說,臨界點已過,美陸進入大國競爭新時代。如此下去,兩國都必須付出大代價。

美陸關係正逐漸向下滑落,繼續朝負面進展,但不一定會出現像懸崖這樣的劇烈落差。不要忘了,美陸有共同的利益。例如在朝鮮半島上彼此為了不同的理由,仍可合作,在整體趨勢朝負方向,仍可有正面發展。但我認為比較危險的是雙邊關係持續滑落。

貿易磨擦 痛苦的還在後面

問:全球都在關注美陸貿易磨擦,但這是一場重新制定全球兩大國─美國與中國大陸經濟和權力關係的新規則,這並不只是一場貿易戰而已?

答:這是世界兩大強國對有關對科技力量的統治權之爭。讓美國覺得不舒坦的是大陸利用例如竊取智慧財產權,使大陸的科技領先,或像是阿里巴巴可到美國,谷歌不能到大陸,類似的問題。所以川普政府要的是大陸終止這樣的工業政策,但我不認為大陸會如此做。大陸或許會在邊緣上釋出一些妥協,但不會放棄中國的工業政策。我擔心,痛苦還在後面。

問:在這種情況下,您如何評估當前的美台關係?台灣可以從棋子變成棋手嗎?

聯美抗陸 非常危險的組合

答:美陸台三角關係間有一定的規律,當美陸關係緊張時,美國和台灣就有想人趁機想增加台灣的有利地位,以為對台灣好可藉此向北京施壓,或認為與美國接近,可增加台灣的安全,有更多軍售,在國際更有尊嚴,諸如此類。不論你是否喜歡,美陸關係愈壞,美台關係就增進,而這則讓大陸做出最糟的舉措。觀看川普政府的印太戰略和國家安全戰略,台灣已經成為越來越被「考慮」的議題。我認為這是令人擔憂的。現在大陸有一個領袖讓人信服中國強大了,美國是一個趨於沒落的強權,台灣島內自認中國人比例大幅下降往北京想要的反方向行進,加上2049年統一時間表,這是非常危險的組合。

問:習近平的外交政策以濃厚的民族主義為後盾,台灣執政者將如何面對?

答:中國大陸政經持續茁壯,台灣不大且接近大陸,在經濟上對大陸依存度高,觀看事實和歷史,台灣必須尋找一個與大陸並存的方法。若大陸使用強硬的手段,對統一有著嚴格的界定,他們將會占據一個敵對的社會。我會提醒大陸領袖,「你不需要統治2300多萬的敵對人民。」

兩岸統一 在大陸毫無爭議

問:國共內戰遺留下來的兩岸問題,看的出解決方法嗎?

答:我不知道。但40多年來出入中國大陸的經驗,我沒有遇到過一個大陸人士不認為中國共產黨具有與台灣統一的合法性。大陸人可能對統一的定義不同,鬆散或嚴格,但我覺得大陸人有點像德國人覺得有一天東西德總要統一的。大陸人爭論許多事,但迄今就我所知,他們對與兩岸統一是沒有爭議的。大陸愈來愈自信,力量日增,美國在地理位置上距離台灣遙,所以最終這個問題還是要由兩岸自己去解決,這是中國人的問題。我不認為川普總統是可信賴的,他可能會因無知鼓勵台灣做一些讓大陸對台祭出可怕回應的事。

★下載Yahoo奇摩APP,隨時掌握最新時事,議題懶人卡一次看懂!



The first person in the United States "Chihwa School" analyzed the triangular relationship between Lumeitai and Taiwan! Lampton warns Trump’s ignorance will eventually hurt Taiwan
[China Newsletter]
China Times Newsletter
7.3k person tracking
An Interview with Jiang Jingling, a Special Commissioner in the United States
May 28, 2018 5:50 AM

China Times [Interviewee of Jiang Jingling and Huaihua in the United States]

According to David Lampton, professor of internationally renowned Chinese research and professor at the Johns Hopkins University's Institute of Advanced International Studies, the relationship between the United States and China has passed the Tipping point, and the relationship between the United States and the United States will not suddenly collapse. However, the continued decline of bilateral relations will be a cause for concern.

Lampton is a well-known expert on Chinese issues in the United States. He was ranked first in the China Overseas Education Institute's "Zhihua School Assessment Report." He accepted the "China Times" exclusive interview and made the above statement. At the same time, he pointed out that in the U.S.-North relationship, Taiwan is a very big factor to consider. When the U.S.-Land relationship is tense, some people in the United States and Taiwan are desperate to increase Taiwan’s advantageous position. Since Trump took power, Taiwan has become an issue that is increasingly considered. However, this may be dangerous. The following are the interview notes.

Question: In 2015, you pointed out that the U.S.-North relationship is approaching the critical point. The elites of the United States increasingly regard the Chinese mainland as a threat to U.S. dominance. The mainland believes that the U.S. prevents China from developing, and now whether U.S.-U.S. relations have reached this critical point ? How far are we from leaving the cliff?

Land and U.S. relations

A: We have already passed that critical point. Evidence can be seen from the three documents of the Trump administration: the new national security strategy clearly positions the mainland as a “competitor”; the national defense strategy report clearly shows that the mainland’s promotion policies are inconsistent with the national interests and values of the United States and announces our entry. Large countries compete for a new era; the nuclear situation assessment report basically shows clearly that we not only compete with the mainland on traditional weapons, but also in the modernization of nuclear weapons. Then we saw that Xi Jinping announced the new era of mainland China in the 19th of October 2017 and pushed the mainland to the center of the new era. Combining these, I will say that the critical point has passed and the United States has entered a new era for major countries to compete. In so doing, both countries must pay a heavy price.

The relationship between the United States and the land is gradually declining and it continues to make negative progress. However, there is not necessarily a sharp drop like the cliff. Do not forget that the United States has common interests. For example, on the Korean peninsula, cooperation can still be achieved for different reasons. In the negative direction of the overall trend, there can still be positive development. But what I think is more dangerous is the continuous decline of bilateral relations.

Trade friction is still painful

Q: The world is paying attention to the trade friction between the US and the US. However, this is a new rule for the re-enactment of the world’s two major countries—the economic and power relations between the United States and the Chinese mainland. Is this not just a trade war?

A: This is a dispute between the world's two largest powers over the right to rule the scientific and technological power. What makes the United States feel uncomfortable is that the mainland uses such things as theft of intellectual property rights, leading the mainland’s technology to lead, or the likes of Alibaba’s access to the United States and Google’s inability to reach the mainland. So the Trump administration wants the mainland to end such industrial policies, but I don't think the mainland will do so. The mainland may release some compromises on the edge, but it will not give up its industrial policy. I worry that the pain is still behind.

Q: In this case, how do you assess the current US-Taiwan relationship? Can Taiwan change from chess pieces to players?

U.S. anti-land very dangerous combination

A: There are certain rules in the triangular relationship between the United States, Taiwan, and the United States. When the relationship between the United States and Luria is tense, the United States and Taiwan want people to take the chance to increase Taiwan’s favorable position, thinking that it is okay for Taiwan to exert pressure on Beijing, or think that The proximity of the United States can increase Taiwan’s security, have more arms sales, be more dignified in the world, and so on. Whether you like it or not, the worse the relationship between the United States and the land, the better the relationship between the United States and Taiwan, and this makes the mainland make the worst move. Looking at the Trump administration's India-Pacific strategy and national security strategy, Taiwan has become an issue that has been increasingly considered. I think this is worrying. Now that there is a leader on the Chinese mainland that convinces China of its strength, the United States is a power that is declining. The island’s self-reported proportion of Chinese people has fallen sharply toward the direction Beijing wants to go, plus a unified timetable of 2049. This is very Dangerous combination.

Question: Xi Jinping’s foreign policy is backed by strong nationalism. How will Taiwan's rulers face?

A: As China's political and economic growth continues to be strong, Taiwan is small and close to the mainland, and it has a high degree of economic dependence on the mainland. Looking at facts and history, Taiwan must find a way to coexist with the mainland. If the mainland uses tough methods and has a strict definition of unity, they will occupy a hostile society. I will remind mainland leaders, "You don't need to rule over 23 million enemy people."

Cross-strait unification is not disputed on the mainland

Question: Are there any solutions to the cross-strait issues left over from the KMT-CPC civil war?

A: I don't know. However, in more than 40 years of experience in entering and leaving the Chinese mainland, I have not encountered a person from the Mainland who does not believe that the Chinese Communist Party has the legitimacy of unification with Taiwan. The mainlanders may have different definitions of unity, loose or strict, but I think the mainlanders are a bit like the Germans think that one day the morality of Germany will always be unified. The mainlanders have argued many things, but to date I know that they have no dispute over the reunification with the two sides of the Taiwan Strait. The continent’s increasingly self-confident and increasingly powerful forces have caused the United States to be geographically distant from Taiwan. Therefore, the final issue is still to be resolved by the two sides of the strait itself. This is a problem for the Chinese people. I do not think that President Trump is trustworthy. He may encourage Taiwan to do something to allow the mainland to make a terrible response to the Taiwanese because of ignorance.
★ Download Yahoo Kimo APP to keep up to date with the latest issues.
 

winnipegjets

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Trump is there for himself. He cares less for America and its people. America deserves to have Trump. He will do that country in.
 

virus

Alfrescian
Loyal
if replace trump with pinkie... i cant tell the difference btwn HPV and HIV since both r toxic
 

Ang4MohTrump

Alfrescian
Loyal
Ang Moh states gave up on Dotard and switched side against him.

https://www.rt.com/news/428066-unreliable-us-trump-kurz/

'US has become unreliable’: Austrian chancellor questions Washington’s commitment to EU
Published time: 29 May, 2018 02:33
Get short URL
5b0cad52dda4c875598b4640.jpg

© Eric Vidal / Reuters
  • 31
The US, under Donald Trump's administration, is becoming increasingly unpredictable and “unreliable” to its European partners, the Austrian chancellor noted, joining a chorus of EU members urging for more unity and self-reliance.
“The US has become more and more unreliable for us,” Sebastian Kurz told the Financial Times. “The most important thing is that Europe has to remain united.”

Concerns about Donald Trump’s administration have been growing across the EU recently. Earlier this month, a poll showed that 82 percent of Germans believe the US is not a reliable political partner after Chancellor Angela Merkel stated that Europe “needs to take its fate into its own hands.”

Read more
'With friends like that who needs enemies’: Tusk lashes out at Trump
The major transatlantic rift first emerged after Trump pulled out of the Paris climate agreement, and it only deepened after the US administration recognized Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, pulled out of the 2015 Iranian nuclear deal and imposed tariffs on aluminum and steel, which are due to come into force in June.

Kurz and Merkel are not the only EU politicians to question Washington’s commitment to its European partners. Earlier this month, European Council President Donald Tusk also questioned the American friendship. The US President “made us realize that if you need a helping hand, you all find one at the end of your arm,” Tusk said in Bulgaria at a Western Balkans summit earlier this month.

“Looking at the latest decisions of President Trump, someone could even think: with friends like that, who needs enemies?” he said. “But frankly speaking, Europe should be grateful for President Trump because thanks to him we have got rid of all illusions,” Tusk added, urging the Europeans to unite, against Washington's “capricious assertiveness.”

Kurtz expanded his message to the European nations, calling on other EU capitals to mend ties with Moscow. “We won’t be able to solve the crisis in Ukraine alone… Syria, we will only be successful if we find a way to act united with the US and Russia, so I think it’s not negative for the EU if countries like Austria — which has always been a bridge-builder — has… a good relationship with Russia,” Kurtz noted.

Speaking to the Financial Times, Kurz also noted that some Western European nations are guilty of treating their Eastern brethren with contempt. He noted that current tensions in the EU are partly caused by the behavior where “some countries think that they act in a more moral and better way than others, that western European countries sometimes look down on eastern European countries.”

Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!

  • 31
 
Top