• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Mac: PAPee Treat Sporns Cheeply. Why Can't We?

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
<TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%"><TBODY><TR>Restaurant should react to accident appropriately
</TR><!-- headline one : end --><!-- show image if available --></TBODY></TABLE>




<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"--><!-- more than 4 paragraphs -->I REFER to Monday's article, "Boy slashed as glass door shatters at McDonald's".
My heart went out to the young boy, Rishi. Unfortunately, McDonald's response as depicted in the article left me more shocked.
Two things caught my attention. First, the article reported that the shattered glass door had been fixed and had a sign saying: "Caution! Beware of glass door!"
Customers do not need to be warned that there is a glass door in front of them. Such caution signs are useful for warning people of things like low ceilings or wet paint or a slippery floor - things that you want them to avoid. If the glass door is dangerous to use, it should not even be there. Take down the sign or take down the door.
Second, the response of McDonald's spokesman Linda Ming was appallingly inappropriate. She said that "the doors are safe as long as they are used properly and responsibly by customers". Clearly, this door was not safe - or is a six-year-old child pushing the door open considered improper and irresponsible use? Where is the sympathy and care?
The fact remains that a young child had a traumatic incident on McDonald's premises, and despite that, no semblance of an apology or regret was found in Ms Ming's reply.
Accidents happen but being defensive worsens the outcome and I am certain McDonald's is more responsible than its reply suggests and will consider making amends to the distraught family.
Su Sicheng
 

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
<TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%"><TBODY><TR>Surprised by fast food chain's blase response to accident
</TR><!-- headline one : end --><!-- show image if available --></TBODY></TABLE>




<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"--><!-- more than 4 paragraphs -->I REFER to the report "Boy slashed as glass door shatters at McDonald's" on Monday.
I am appalled by the McDonald's spokesman's remark that "it was an isolated and unfortunate occurrence".
There appeared to be no regret over a breach of safety arising from this incident.
To dismiss this serious incident as a mere one-off matter, despite a previous similarly serious incident in another McDonald's outlet a few years back, smacks of arrogance quite unbecoming of a global company renowned and emulated for its corporate social responsibility.
Let's recap the accident in the light of McDonald's terse, dismissive remark: A six-year-old child suffered serious injury. His mother says the boy is now fearful of glass doors and McDonald's restaurants.
And worse, the mother was reportedly left to her own resources and told to take her child to a nearby clinic. What assistance did the McDonald's staff provide?
Surely a child who is injured by the shattering of a glass door should have been treated at a hospital instead.
S. Ganesamoorthy
 

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
OO5O.jpg


Copy cat! *chey*
 
Top