• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Mabroky: Only PAPee Dogs Can Be Advisors. TIME TO REVOLT AGAINST SUCH CORRUPTION!

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
<TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%"><TBODY><TR>Advisers and MPs have different roles
</TR><!-- headline one : end --><!-- show image if available --></TBODY></TABLE>




<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"--><!-- more than 4 paragraphs -->IN HER commentary last Thursday, ''Adviser over MP' raises many questions', Ms Sue-Ann Chia has misunderstood the roles of Members of Parliament (MPs) and advisers to grassroots organisations.
The MP is elected by the people of a constituency, and represents them in and outside Parliament.
In Singapore, MPs also have an important role in running town councils. As provided for in the Town Councils Act, this role includes managing the common property of HDB estates and carrying out local improvement projects, thereby contributing to the well-being of the people of the constituency.
As for the government-appointed adviser, his main role is to assist in implementing national programmes, such as government campaigns, and HDB's upgrading programmes, including the Lift Upgrading Programme (LUP).
The roles of MP and adviser are distinct and separate, even though government MPs, wearing their other hat of advisers, are expected to perform both roles.
Opposition MPs cannot be appointed advisers, because they do not answer to the ruling party. They have no constitutional or legal obligation to carry out national programmes on the Government's behalf. Nor can the Government hold them to account if they perform this role unsatisfactorily.
Let me re-emphasise that the LUP is not a town council programme. It is a national programme which receives most of its funding from the Government.

=> In other words, the so-called "advisors" must be PAPee-affiliated. Who laid down such blatantly corrupt rules? Btw, where does the govt get its money from in the first place? It's very scary that the so-called BEST PAID & BEST BRAINs in the cuntry can degenrate into such stupidity and evil when stuffed with enough money!

Therefore, in opposition wards, it is the government-appointed adviser who is accountable for implementing national programmes like the LUP. In doing so, the adviser will work closely with the local town council and residents.
Lim Yuin Chien
Press Secretary to the
Minister for National Development
 

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
In short, the PAPee CCBs are telling Sporns in their faces that since they have been given the blank cheque, they can do what they want! Don't you really feel like giving those 66% a tight slap for their folly and causing misery to both themselves and the remaining 34%?
 
Top