• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Lucky discovered before record IPO, damn chek ark man!

downgrader

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
1,125
Points
38
http://www.businesstimes.com.sg/sub/news/story/0,4574,384343,00.html?

Published May 5, 2010

New Century IPO sinks in wake of complaint
Sudden about-turn after SGX receives complaint about lawsuit, material irregularities


By MICHELLE QUAH


(SINGAPORE) Singapore's largest local share offering this year - that of Chinese shipbuilder New Century Shipbuilding - has run aground.


The company announced last night that 'it has decided not to go ahead with its planned initial public offering (IPO) on the SGX-ST (Singapore Exchange) at this time'.

The sudden and unexpected withdrawal of the S$666.4 million IPO came on the eve of the offering's closing - and just days before the company's shares were due to begin trading next Tuesday.

An about-turn of this nature is said to be unprecedented in the local trading context.

New Century said yesterday that it would 'review the situation' and consider listing here 'at an appropriate time in the near future'.

The company gave no reasons for the withdrawal.

But sources have told The Business Times that the listing could not go ahead because SGX had received a complaint about New Century's prospectus containing material inaccuracies.

BT understands that the company's subsidiary is battling a lawsuit over the building of two bulk carriers (ships) for Sino Noble Pte Ltd, in a deal worth US$180 million.

One of New Century's two shipyards in China - New Times Shipyard - is understood to have been contracted to build the two ships.

The shipbuilding contracts are said to have been cancelled late last year and the client, Sino Noble, is now claiming back what it has paid for these ships, thus far - some US$60 million.

Sources told BT that a complaint was lodged with SGX this week over the fact that this lawsuit was not disclosed in New Century's prospectus - as well as the fact that the orders for the two ships are still reflected in the company's order book in its prospectus.

Indeed, the company's prospectus states, on page 206, that 'we (New Century) are not engaged in any legal or arbitration proceedings (either as plaintiff or defendant), including those that are pending or known to be contemplated, which may have or have had a material effect on our financial position or profitability in the past 12 months immediately preceding the date of the lodgment of this offering document with the Authority (Monetary Authority of Singapore)'.

The prospectus also states: 'As at March 31, 2010, the aggregate contract value of our order book amounted to approximately US$5.2 billion which included orders for 83 vessels with a combined tonnage of approximately 10.8 million DWT. The vessels are expected to be delivered between 2010 and 2012.'

Of these 83 vessels are two bulk carriers contracted by Sino Noble Pte Ltd, with a contractual delivery date of 2010, to be built by New Times Shipyard.

Information about the lawsuit and the termination of the shipbuilding contracts was not included in New Century's prospectus, despite the fact that the contracts had been cancelled last November and the arbitration proceedings were commenced against New Times on March 18 - both events taking place before March 31, 2010, which is the latest practicable date prior to the lodgement of the company's prospectus with MAS.

New Century said yesterday that, with the withdrawal of its IPO, all applications are deemed withdrawn and cancelled, and application monies will be refunded to applicants within three market days.

It also thanked the investing community, SGX and the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) 'for their support, as well as their many advisers for their hard work in progressing its IPO application'.

UBS Investment Bank and Morgan Stanley are the joint bookrunners for the IPO. DBS is the sub-placement agent and coordinator of the IPO, while CIMB-GK Securities is the other sub-placement agent.

New Century, based in Jingjiang, China, is ranked fifth domestically in terms of its order book, measured by total deadweight tonnage (the weight a ship can safely carry). It is ranked 13th among shipbuilders worldwide.

Last year, New Century's profit stood at US$343.9 million, while its revenue hit US$1.63 billion.

The company's IPO was Singapore's largest since CapitaMalls Asia's IPO late last year. New Century had offered 560 million shares at a maximum price of S$1.19 each.
 
Nothing new here. China company run by the China Chinese. Can smoke, will smoke, have smoke, sure will "smoke". This is what they live and die by each day.
 
Nothing new here. China company run by the China Chinese. Can smoke, will smoke, have smoke, sure will "smoke". This is what they live and die by each day.

You mean they sit down & have a 'hoon kee' together???;)
 
Nothing new here. China company run by the China Chinese. Can smoke, will smoke, have smoke, sure will "smoke". This is what they live and die by each day.


hi there

1. bro, bingo!
2. now, we know how young chin guys,some even below 40 are on the rich list man!
3. honest, chin breathe, eat and live lies.
 
As at yesterday evening they still had an IPO roadshow booth outside raffles place Mrt. So suddenly pull the plug already?
 
So where is the due diligence from SGX as a regulatory body? If not for this tip-off send through an email, the investing public will again be fleeced by this S-Chip IPO. SGX must be held accountable for its tardiness. :mad:
 
All around the world, the ability of financial regulatory authorities to do a proper supervisory job, of enforcing the checks & balances is a crying joke ...

SGX just take everything at face value - unless somebody squeals, they can always claim it is impossible to do a thorough vetting job, fucking highly paid good-for-nothing shirkers :oIo:
All the code of ethics, highfalutin values expoused in Mission Statements & Customer Charter in Merill Lynch, Bank of America, AIA, Goldman Sachs are all for show only ....
 
All the code of ethics, highfalutin values expoused in Mission Statements & Customer Charter in Merill Lynch, Bank of America, AIA, Goldman Sachs are all for show only ....

i notice you left out rating agencies like s&p, moody's etc. they were the ones who vetted and rated toxic products. those fuckers should rot in hell.
 
As at yesterday evening they still had an IPO roadshow booth outside raffles place Mrt. So suddenly pull the plug already?

They thought after they con LKY in Suzhou they sure can con LKY Ginna. Unfortunately there are still smart sinkies left who while seating on the toilet bowl reading newspaper searching for jobs that are being discarded by FT, he stumbled upon the discrepencies. This sinkies is now considered rare species.
 
All around the world, the ability of financial regulatory authorities to do a proper supervisory job, of enforcing the checks & balances is a crying joke ...

PAP already told you the regulators are not paid enough, that is why they can't do a proper job. What PAP did not tell you is that it is forever not enough so that they can always use the same excuse for whatever screw-ups that occur.
 
i notice you left out rating agencies like s&p, moody's etc. they were the ones who vetted and rated toxic products. those fuckers should rot in hell.

You are right. Those fuckers are ONE big greedycolluding eco-system & their members move in & move out of each others' domain... all K. K. N. types..
Not to say true blue honest types are extinct, but honest, capable & in power to be of influence - that is lagi more rare ...

PAP already told you the regulators are not paid enough, that is why they can't do a proper job. What PAP did not tell you is that it is forever not enough so that they can always use the same excuse for whatever screw-ups that occur.

True, if there is NO heart of gold & values of incorruptibility, 'high pay doctrine' is forever NOT enough ....

You sure, whistle blower are poor displaced citizens with a sharp eye ?
more likely 'internal devils' as the chinese like to say, who are 'buay song' with their share of windfall & decided to spite the fat cats ....

sigh... it is a real cynical world ....:oIo:
 
So where is the due diligence from SGX as a regulatory body? If not for this tip-off send through an email, the investing public will again be fleeced by this S-Chip IPO. SGX must be held accountable for its tardiness. :mad:

Dont think this is the first time, nor the last time. Those who remember the CLOB Malaysian Counters saga, will know..the head of then SGX?...was allowed to ride...into the sunset.

:p
 
After the numerous cases of lapses of corporate governance involving PRC companies, those who still go and buy their shares really do deserve it.

Melamine in baby food, bleach in flour,tainted water, the list goes on......

What is the responsibility of DBS as the sub-placement agent and coordinator of the IPO ?
Obviously the banking consolidation led by none other than 'Mee Siam Mai Hum' resulting in thousands of Singaporeans losing their jobs is a major failure.

This was followed by the Mini-bonds fiasco and the failed investments in the very same financial institutions that caused billions in losses both for the man in the street and our reserves.

When you have people who pay themselves the highest salaries in the world and yet are not accountable for their failures-what do you expect?

Be prepared for more suffering and misery.
When will we say enough is enough?
 
If this IPO goes through, SGX, UBS and New Century will make tons of money out from it The investors are the losers.


The Spore brand is tarnished, especially Temasick

Was talking to some Indonesians & they tell me they've gotten rid of anything to do with Temasick. :D

So it's going to be difficult for Temasick to find new investors because word has gotten around about their reputation.
 
Really disappointed with JY Pillay. The trend and the past record is obvious and yet this continues to happen.

There should be a law suit or report to CAD launched for attempted fraud. There should be an escrow account or some sort of deposit for this kind of events.

In fact, Ministry of Finance should have launched an inquiry and taken both SGX and UOB to task for all the China listings.


So where is the due diligence from SGX as a regulatory body? If not for this tip-off send through an email, the investing public will again be fleeced by this S-Chip IPO. SGX must be held accountable for its tardiness. :mad:

All around the world, the ability of financial regulatory authorities to do a proper supervisory job, of enforcing the checks & balances is a crying joke ...

...
 
Back
Top