There is a difference between being a moderate political party and an unwitting supporter of the PAP system. It is most unfortunate; the Worker’s Party under the leadership of Low Thia Kiang and Sylvia Lim has fallen into the trap of being an unwitting supporter of the PAP system, which involves tweaking your message so as not to offend, or so as to dilute or conceal the true facts, or even worse, to explicitly agree with the PAP on certain points (the rule of unjust laws being one example) just so as to pass under their radar safely.
By publicly agreeing with the PAP, that the opposition is weak and with insufficient talent, both Low and Lim have admitted the Worker’s Party is not ready to form the government and have explicitly agreed the PAP are at present the best suited to form the government for the foreseeable future.
The Worker’s Party by its leadership’s own admission needs experience managing town councils and improving debating skills in parliament. The Worker’s Party also claim to provide “check and balance” in parliament, even though there is little evidence that has been the case since Low has been an MP for over 20 years and Lim an NCMP since 2006.
Lee Hsien Loong, made his point crystal clear, no doubt emboldened by Low and Lim’s admission last evening, when law student, Edmund Koh Joo Peng posed a question. “Isn’t it unfair to really divide us because we live in Potong Pasir?” Potong Pasir, Mr. Koh said, “has been left out of the upgrading twice.”
Lee replied, “If you ask the people of Potong Pasir who do they want to make the Government of Singapore, I think they would say they want the Government to be PAP, so too in Hougang … In other words, they are depending on somebody else to vote for the PAP so that they can have the luxury of voting for Mr. Chiam or Mr. Low. Now, if everybody in Singapore does that we’re in trouble. So there has to be an incentive to vote for the Government and going first or second, that’s just that little bit of difference.”
Lee was made to look magnanimous when he reiterated national programs, like education, healthcare and defence covers everyone.
The Worker’s Party philosophy is that the best chance of being elected into parliament is to give what they think the people want — something resembling the PAP in terms of political vision, but being able to disagree with the PAP on policy issues and debate accordingly. There is evidence of Worker’s Party doing so just 2 days ago when replying to a question from The Online Citizen on whether the party supported the death penalty, Mr. Singh said the social barometer as far as Singaporeans are concerned is not leaning towards the removal of the death penalty. Worker’s Party’s alternatively to HDB, where median income is used, is another such example, which leaves many unanswered questions.
So what does the WP really believe in and stand for?
How does one know if elected, they will deliver what they say they would, if they base their ideology not on sound principles but on whatever happens to be the political mood of the day?
-
By publicly agreeing with the PAP, that the opposition is weak and with insufficient talent, both Low and Lim have admitted the Worker’s Party is not ready to form the government and have explicitly agreed the PAP are at present the best suited to form the government for the foreseeable future.
The Worker’s Party by its leadership’s own admission needs experience managing town councils and improving debating skills in parliament. The Worker’s Party also claim to provide “check and balance” in parliament, even though there is little evidence that has been the case since Low has been an MP for over 20 years and Lim an NCMP since 2006.
Lee Hsien Loong, made his point crystal clear, no doubt emboldened by Low and Lim’s admission last evening, when law student, Edmund Koh Joo Peng posed a question. “Isn’t it unfair to really divide us because we live in Potong Pasir?” Potong Pasir, Mr. Koh said, “has been left out of the upgrading twice.”
Lee replied, “If you ask the people of Potong Pasir who do they want to make the Government of Singapore, I think they would say they want the Government to be PAP, so too in Hougang … In other words, they are depending on somebody else to vote for the PAP so that they can have the luxury of voting for Mr. Chiam or Mr. Low. Now, if everybody in Singapore does that we’re in trouble. So there has to be an incentive to vote for the Government and going first or second, that’s just that little bit of difference.”
Lee was made to look magnanimous when he reiterated national programs, like education, healthcare and defence covers everyone.
The Worker’s Party philosophy is that the best chance of being elected into parliament is to give what they think the people want — something resembling the PAP in terms of political vision, but being able to disagree with the PAP on policy issues and debate accordingly. There is evidence of Worker’s Party doing so just 2 days ago when replying to a question from The Online Citizen on whether the party supported the death penalty, Mr. Singh said the social barometer as far as Singaporeans are concerned is not leaning towards the removal of the death penalty. Worker’s Party’s alternatively to HDB, where median income is used, is another such example, which leaves many unanswered questions.
So what does the WP really believe in and stand for?
How does one know if elected, they will deliver what they say they would, if they base their ideology not on sound principles but on whatever happens to be the political mood of the day?
-
