• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

LTeaA: 154th Talked Cock, We Didn't!

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Jul 24, 2008
Messages
33,627
Points
0
Apr 26, 2010

Review covers only bus routes with reliability issues

<!-- by line --><!-- end by line -->
<!-- end left side bar --><!-- story content : start -->
I REFER to the report, 'Govt to review long bus routes' (March 29). There have been some concerns that the Government will remove all long-distance bus services over time and that no new ones will be introduced. We wish to put the correct perspective on the issue and allay any unwarranted concerns.
When Second Minister for Transport Lim Hwee Hua said there will be no new long-distance buses in future, she meant that no new ones will be introduced as an alternative to the hub-and-spoke model on which our public transport system is based. As the rail network does not extend to all parts of the island, trunk bus services will still be needed as they form an integral part of the hub-and-spoke model and new ones will be introduced when necessary in this context.
As for existing long-distance bus routes, the Land Transport Authority (LTA) will review only those that have known reliability issues and where there are sensible mid-points to break them, so that overall, more commuters will benefit.

[COLOR=_______]=> Isn't this the same as removal of the service? How commuters can benefit from the loss of service is indeed perplexing. Expect travelling time and cost to be increased. Yet another piece warped reasoning by the fcuking FAPee DOGS! [/COLOR]

The LTA recognises that there are many other long bus routes that do not face reliability problems and these will not be changed.
The LTA has been consulting the different communities islandwide on the proposals it is developing as the central bus network planner. It is mindful of the impact that changes to bus services will have on commuters, and will carefully evaluate and reconcile the different views before making any route changes. It will take into consideration the alternatives for affected commuters, overall journey times, fares and ease of transfers.
Phua Hooi Boon
Director (Land Transport Division)
Ministry of Transport


<!-- story content : end -->
 
<TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 width="100%"><TBODY><TR><TD class=heading>Latest comments</TD></TR><TR><TD id=messageDisplayRegion width="100%"><TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%" cellSpacing=2 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%" cellSpacing=2 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%" class=Post cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>Our transport system is moving towards the hub and spoke model. Here are some of my concerns:
1) Currently, there have been indications that buses are overcrowded, and passngers having difficulty to board buses, especially those providing direct access to other areas. Buses with low rider-ship has low frequency.

Trains are equally crowded as well during morning rush hour. Even transferring from North-South to East-West Line can be a hassle, evident in the provision of service 128 by SBS Transit during morning peak to provide commuters with alternative during moring rush.

Some past forums indicating current situation of bus service provision:

http://comment.straitstimes.com/showthread.php?t=32865

http://comment.straitstimes.com/showthread.php?t=31403

Evidence has also revealed that bus operators are profit orientated, often at the expanse of efficiency.

(Is there a case for more buses to serve that particular route? Ms Tammy Tan, senior vice-president corporate communications, at SBS Transit , said service 200 is one of its less popular routes.

"It has an average daily ridership of only 2300, compared to as many as 38500 for other routes." she said,

Source: http://comment.straitstimes.com/showthread.php?t=32865 )

Does the hub and spoke model implies that commuters may have to be stranded (either by long bus wait for low-rider-ship buses, or overcrowding for popular ones) at multiple transfer point (hub), instead of just once, if direct service is provided?
</TD></TR><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>Posted by: Commenter0919 at Mon Apr 26 11:07:04 SGT 2010
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%" cellSpacing=2 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%" class=AlternatePost cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>To roll out a policy without resistance, we must go for acceptance first - thus no long distance will be touched. Eventually when cries dies off, the long distance will be tweaked and slowly change and disappear.

It is like hell minister said, the wet market can be transacted, but it will remain as wet markets. Yes, he keep his word, what happen is price goes up.

Got it, it is not wit and playing around with words. Vote for Lim Hwee Hua next GE, she is the masterhand to introduce more ERP, tweak COE with Lemon, Vote for Mr Khaw, he introduce hell acts and also supported bringing casino (it elevate the 'living standards' for singaporeaen).
</TD></TR><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>Posted by: LifeisReallyTough at Mon Apr 26 09:42:36 SGT 2010
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 
Back
Top