• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

LKY can count on Gurkhas NO MORE

uncleyap

Alfrescian
Loyal
Old Dog Thief Lee Kuan Yew can not rely on Gurkha any longer


Time has changed but Old Dog Thief already used Gurkha to safeguard his own royal famiLEE as well as his LEEgime for decades, not to mention safeguarding his cronies. Too bad that things had changed.

In the Gurkha's high mountain homeland of Nepal, entire royal family Gurkha's King Birendra was massacred on Friday 1 June 2001. The new king Gyanendra was removed from monarchy power totally on 28. May 2008. All these regime changes the Gurkhas regardless how loyal and strong had all failed to prevent nor protect.

Can Old Dog Thief Lee Kuan Yew still expect Gurkha to protect his famiLEE & LEEgime? :-)

No!

Because on 27.Feb2008, Lee Kuan Yew's Gurkha guards let JI's Mas Selamat Ke-Lari flee from ISD's high security detention center. And despite S$1,000,000 reward posted still fail to find him after 6 months of man hunting.

That is not the worst for Lee Kuan Yew's with Gurkha yet.

Lee Kuan Yew's most feared decade old communist enemy had been VOTED into power in Gurkha's homeland Nepal just about a week ago almost precisely on Singapore's National Day! Now back at their homeland the Gurkhas' have a Maoist Prime Minister elected and sworn in. A communist government is on the way being formed.

This is Old Dog Thief's nightmare. He arrested detained and put away Lim Chin Siong, Chia Thye Poh & Said Zahari etc Barisan Socialist comrades of himself and betrayed his communist brothers. But now his Gurkhas had just officially became a foreign force from a communist land!

How is Old Dog Thief Lee Kuan Yew going to be able to depend on Gurkha any longer? Now that Gurkhas had voted in a Maoist Government in Nepal....

Oh poor old dog LKy, what are you going to do?

:-)
:p




posted by uncleyap at 9:43 AM
 

troubledtimes

Alfrescian
Loyal
Ledgen has it that Mat Salamat's escape was alot less spectular than previously thought. Apparently, some renovation was being done in the toilets in the facility he was put up in. When he wanted to take a toilet break, he entered the one that is being renovated. He found some contractor cover-alls and hard hat, changed into those and simply walked out...
 

mini_me

Alfrescian
Loyal
Is this piece on LKY or the Gurkhas ?

Honestly, I have not seen the Gurkhas in action in recent times but their aggresiveness and loyalty are well-known traits. Think their demise is a bit pre-mature.
 
A

Alu862

Guest
What this shows is that if SDP wins control of parliament, we are doomed with Yap as a Minister.


Old Dog Thief Lee Kuan Yew can not rely on Gurkha any longer


Time has changed but Old Dog Thief already used Gurkha to safeguard his own royal famiLEE as well as his LEEgime for decades, not to mention safeguarding his cronies. Too bad that things had changed.

In the Gurkha's high mountain homeland of Nepal, entire royal family Gurkha's King Birendra was massacred on Friday 1 June 2001. The new king Gyanendra was removed from monarchy power totally on 28. May 2008. All these regime changes the Gurkhas regardless how loyal and strong had all failed to prevent nor protect.

Can Old Dog Thief Lee Kuan Yew still expect Gurkha to protect his famiLEE & LEEgime? :-)

No!

Because on 27.Feb2008, Lee Kuan Yew's Gurkha guards let JI's Mas Selamat Ke-Lari flee from ISD's high security detention center. And despite S$1,000,000 reward posted still fail to find him after 6 months of man hunting.

That is not the worst for Lee Kuan Yew's with Gurkha yet.

Lee Kuan Yew's most feared decade old communist enemy had been VOTED into power in Gurkha's homeland Nepal just about a week ago almost precisely on Singapore's National Day! Now back at their homeland the Gurkhas' have a Maoist Prime Minister elected and sworn in. A communist government is on the way being formed.

This is Old Dog Thief's nightmare. He arrested detained and put away Lim Chin Siong, Chia Thye Poh & Said Zahari etc Barisan Socialist comrades of himself and betrayed his communist brothers. But now his Gurkhas had just officially became a foreign force from a communist land!

How is Old Dog Thief Lee Kuan Yew going to be able to depend on Gurkha any longer? Now that Gurkhas had voted in a Maoist Government in Nepal....

Oh poor old dog LKy, what are you going to do?

:-)
:p




posted by uncleyap at 9:43 AM
 
A

Alu862

Guest
Gurhkas overseas are loyal to their own regiment there not to their country. Yap, you know nothing.




Old Dog Thief Lee Kuan Yew can not rely on Gurkha any longer


Time has changed but Old Dog Thief already used Gurkha to safeguard his own royal famiLEE as well as his LEEgime for decades, not to mention safeguarding his cronies. Too bad that things had changed.

In the Gurkha's high mountain homeland of Nepal, entire royal family Gurkha's King Birendra was massacred on Friday 1 June 2001. The new king Gyanendra was removed from monarchy power totally on 28. May 2008. All these regime changes the Gurkhas regardless how loyal and strong had all failed to prevent nor protect.

Can Old Dog Thief Lee Kuan Yew still expect Gurkha to protect his famiLEE & LEEgime? :-)

No!

Because on 27.Feb2008, Lee Kuan Yew's Gurkha guards let JI's Mas Selamat Ke-Lari flee from ISD's high security detention center. And despite S$1,000,000 reward posted still fail to find him after 6 months of man hunting.

That is not the worst for Lee Kuan Yew's with Gurkha yet.

Lee Kuan Yew's most feared decade old communist enemy had been VOTED into power in Gurkha's homeland Nepal just about a week ago almost precisely on Singapore's National Day! Now back at their homeland the Gurkhas' have a Maoist Prime Minister elected and sworn in. A communist government is on the way being formed.

This is Old Dog Thief's nightmare. He arrested detained and put away Lim Chin Siong, Chia Thye Poh & Said Zahari etc Barisan Socialist comrades of himself and betrayed his communist brothers. But now his Gurkhas had just officially became a foreign force from a communist land!

How is Old Dog Thief Lee Kuan Yew going to be able to depend on Gurkha any longer? Now that Gurkhas had voted in a Maoist Government in Nepal....

Oh poor old dog LKy, what are you going to do?

:-)
:p




posted by uncleyap at 9:43 AM
 

uncleyap

Alfrescian
Loyal
Then how come you failed to see it via the angle of policy? This is about LKy's dumb out-dated policy of hiring FT (Foreign Traitors) Gurkha.

Can you see it better now?:smile:

Take it easy OK?
 

uncleyap

Alfrescian
Loyal
Ask the old dog thief did US Marines saved the ass of Georgian peasants last week during Singapore's NDP? Russian tank column was only an hour ride to reach Georgian capital, there wasn't much significant resistance to stop the Russians, it was themselves who decided not to enter the capital.

Stupid old dog proved his stupid mistake again and again to dream that US military will save their ass in their emergency. Saddam is best example to be an ex-US ally to get used and betrayed and back-stabbed.

No future govt of Singapore should repeat this seriously wrong military strategy ever again.
 
A

Alu862

Guest
Then how come you failed to see it via the angle of policy? This is about LKy's dumb out-dated policy of hiring FT (Foreign Traitors) Gurkha.

Can you see it better now?:smile:

Take it easy OK?

You want to label people FT, label the PRCs. Not the Gurhkas.

They have served and will serve with distinction in the UK or anywhere.

Unlike you.
 

neddy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Is this piece on LKY or the Gurkhas ?

Honestly, I have not seen the Gurkhas in action in recent times but their aggresiveness and loyalty are well-known traits. Think their demise is a bit pre-mature.
gurkhas make good cooks, that is what some became after UK dismantle HK's Gurkha force. :-)
 

uncleyap

Alfrescian
Loyal
Don't try stupid childish arguments with me.

ANY soldiers are to carry out duties and accomplish mission even if they had to die.

That is regardless weather it is for a nation or a mercenary contract.

The guards in Nepalese Palace are soldiers who are supposed to protect palace but failed and their mission compromised entirely and entire royal family was massacred.

The royal family aka king employed them, regardless weather that was NS or mercenary contract, they failed to perform and compromised their duties as soldiers.

They let Mas Selamat Ke-Lari flee ISD is also exactly an identical failure.

You don't need to put up silly arguments to say weather they are loyal to regiment or not loyal to Wong Kan Seng etc. These arguments only point to one thing - that is you are insulting yourself and talking rubbish.

Even if we employed Ah Pek security guard to watch the car park, Ah Pek is also expected not to compromise the security of the car park. Very simple weather country or what not, isn't the issue.

154th news already reported that Gurkha in their camps were fighting between lower ranks and officers and 20 of them were injured and took medical treatments. This is how useful and loyal even to their own officers they are.

I still never heard any SAF platoon gang up to punch their PC or OC yet. But these are old dog thief's pathetic elite and most loyal Gurkha....

Oh sad...

May be tomorrow Wong Kan Seng's poodle mata will team up and blanket party him?:p
 
A

Alu862

Guest
I won't say anymore except I will not vote for SDP and the likes of you.





Don't try stupid childish arguments with me.

ANY soldiers are to carry out duties and accomplish mission even if they had to die.

That is regardless weather it is for a nation or a mercenary contract.

The guards in Nepalese Palace are soldiers who are supposed to protect palace but failed and their mission compromised entirely and entire royal family was massacred.

The royal family aka king employed them, regardless weather that was NS or mercenary contract, they failed to perform and compromised their duties as soldiers.

They let Mas Selamat Ke-Lari flee ISD is also exactly an identical failure.

You don't need to put up silly arguments to say weather they are loyal to regiment or not loyal to Wong Kan Seng etc. These arguments only point to one thing - that is you are insulting yourself and talking rubbish.

Even if we employed Ah Pek security guard to watch the car park, Ah Pek is also expected not to compromise the security of the car park. Very simple weather country or what not, isn't the issue.

154th news already reported that Gurkha in their camps were fighting between lower ranks and officers and 20 of them were injured and took medical treatments. This is how useful and loyal even to their own officers they are.

I still never heard any SAF platoon gang up to punch their PC or OC yet. But these are old dog thief's pathetic elite and most loyal Gurkha....

Oh sad...

May be tomorrow Wong Kan Seng's poodle mata will team up and blanket party him?:p
 

tun_dr_m

Alfrescian
Loyal
You want to label people FT, label the PRCs. Not the Gurhkas.

They have served and will serve with distinction in the UK or anywhere.

Unlike you.

Served UK so what? Ang Mohs Tua Kee or what?

Deskar Road Ah Qua & Orchard Road Prostitutes also served Ang Mohs also you mean Gurkhas are any better then these?

These are all low life who work for money without soul, except that some fuck for money and some shoot for money, any big deals?

:biggrin:

Not to say serve Ang Moh here and then vote for communists at home.

Fucking traitors!
 
A

Alu862

Guest
Why is that what democracy is? power of the poeple? So if the people vote a marxist government you blame the people? Why theen you have denied them the basic right of free speech! You mean in a democracy all parties can exist except socialist/communist parties? Wow!


Development economist Michael Todaro noted that there is a lose link between democracy and development. So have many others.
 

borom

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
What we should ask (and the Wayang Party ask in Parliament) is this-why are the ministers and Head of State being guarded by foreign mecenaries-don't they trust their fellow Singaporeans to guard them.
We must be the only country in the world where the Head of State/Government and Ministers are being guarded by foreigners.:eek:
 

wallace

Alfrescian
Loyal
What this shows is that if SDP wins control of parliament, we are doomed with Yap as a Minister.

Minister Yap will be the Home Affairs Ministers.

He will be signing ISA detention orders for all PAP ministers.

Old Dog and son will be banished to Tekong Island :biggrin: :biggrin:
 

BlueCat

Alfrescian
Loyal
those Gurkhas are not for him la.
anywhere as bro wallace mentioned,he already has been assigned bodyguards by the government.
 
Top