• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Lim Boon Heng - increase bus fare so that we can pay bus drivers higher salaries

†††††

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jan 23, 2010
Messages
1,746
Points
0
Fare hikes 'help bus workers and operators'

FORMER labour chief and minister in the Prime Minister's Office Lim Boon Heng waded into the public transport debate yesterday, explaining why fare increases, while unpopular, are necessary.

If bus fares were never allowed to go up, transport operators might not have enough 'to invest in new buses, and quality of service must drop'.

Speaking at a delegates' conference of the Singapore Shell Employees' Union, he noted that fare increases also went towards funding pay rises for workers.

'You know raising bus fares is unpopular. But if we cannot raise bus fares, how will that impact your fellow workers? I am sure you will understand that it is not fair if they cannot get wage increases,' he said.

'But their wage increase will be funded by fare increases, which adversely impact the public.'

Mr Lim, who left the Cabinet after the May General Election, said that in the absence of productivity improvements, a 3 per cent wage increase for workers meant that fares had to go up by 1.5 per cent because labour costs make up half the total operating costs for buses.

In the past, operators did their best to stave off fare hikes through productivity improvements, he said.

Examples included doing away with conductors so buses became one-man operations, and introducing double-decker and bendy buses so each driver served more passengers.

'So productivity went up, fares were kept down, but bus drivers could get wage increases as wages of conductors no longer featured in the cost of operations,' he said.

But going forward, it will be harder to make similar high gains in productivity.

To add to the conundrum, fuel costs make up 30 per cent of operating costs. So a further hike in oil prices, which is beyond the control of bus firms, will also impact on operating margins, he said.

'But from the workers' perspective, when there are millions in profits, they want the employer to pay them better wages. To them, millions of dollars in profits is a lot of money. And the commuting public feels fare increases are not justified,' he said.

SMRT posted net earnings of $161.1 million for the year ended this March, while SBS Transit had a net profit of $54.3 million for the year up to last December.

Both companies applied for fare increases earlier this month.

But Mr Lim said companies also need to invest in new buses that are of higher quality as well as handicapped- and elderly-friendly.

ELGIN TOH
 
Mr Lim....ur comrade tokked abt the need for wage rise to be on par with productivity growth in parliament, so what is the productivity growth exhibited by SMRT and SBS?

Oh yes, the level of congestion has grown - but surely you will agree that cannot be considered as producitvity growth right?
 
haha cheebye Lim Boon Heng talk cock. Then why not increase prices at NTUC too, so that those ah tiong NTUC cashiers can earn more?
 
haha cheebye Lim Boon Heng talk cock. Then why not increase prices at NTUC too, so that those ah tiong NTUC cashiers can earn more?


hi there


1. why is the crying sheep crying out loud for some "pte" establishments leh?
2. there are so many sheep having the same issue.
3. useless sheep has not done homework or what.
4. the transport operators are making millions for so many years.
5. what's enough?
6. just another fart, fart and more farts from the crying sheep!
 
So only bus drivers deserve pay raise? LANJIAO ok! Why don't raise the salary of toilet cleaners? Is that fair to them? Oh....better idea, why don't increase taxes on MPs to transfer them to those low wage earners?

LIM BOON HENG U CAN GO FUCK DOG! More specifically, you go fuck this dog....

davidgrt.gif
 
So chebye Ah Heng, how much are you increasing the pay of these bus drivers in the future..???
$5000 per month salary for them..???

Fuckin bastard hopeless skunk Lim Boon Heng.. Last time you are shit as an NTUC chief, useless as a Minister and now you are opening your fuckin mouth for your old masters..???

This fuckin bastard is tryin to implicate the bus drivers in the PAP's desperate attempt to soothe the resentment of Sporeans towards the imminient fare hikes..

The Operators are getting good profits every year.. dont talk cock ok Cb Ah heng.. :mad:

Both you and Lim Fuck yew can ass fuck each other till the cows come home...:mad:
 
The PAP is obviously behind the push for the fare hikes. First you have PM LHL making excuses why fares should be increased. Now you have Lim Boon Heng lending his support:rolleyes: Hope voters will remember this at the next GE:mad:

If the issue is about increasing wages, it should be discussed at the national level.

However looking at the track record of the PAP the increases in prices serve only to increase their own pay & not to help "lesser mortals" :rolleyes:
 
Pinky should consider opening the floodgate this time again from shitland for the lowest caste shitskin aka The Pariahs as they can be whipped & they will go barefooted, they can be crammed in the bus interchanges toilet during the night and you can pay them LKY's cum (if there still any, otherwise it is nothing exactly). Profit will go up by another 40 millions & with the increase in fares a further 80 millions. Thus this fiscal year closing for the operators will be well above 300 millions. Shareholders will thank them so much & this will assure that the next election PAP will not garner less than the 60%.
 
before election, it was for the voters. after GE, 錢最親 . what voters??
 
Back
Top