• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Life, Liberty And Pursuit Of Happiness

jw5

Moderator
Moderator
Loyal
Joined
Jul 14, 2008
Messages
89,438
Points
113
This is what Americans always claim to be their "rights". At least I hear that from Larry Kudlow on CNBC.

I have 3 questions for your comments or replies here:

1. Do you think that all these 3 items are also claimed by Singaporeans to be their "rights"? Do you feel that you get all these 3 items here?

2. If "life" is proclaimed to be one of the rights, why is "death" not considered a right? Suicide is still considered a crime if I'm not mistaken. Why should it be a crime if you do it quietly without interfering with causing others inconvenience?

3. Do you think privacy should also be considered a "right"? Do you think you have privacy? If that's the case, should you have the right to say no or decline any questions from anyone, including the police, unless they have reason to believe you are involved in a crime?
Do you have a right to decline questions from anyone including surveys, census, salesmen, charity salesmen and even pranksters making tv programmes like Just For Laughs?
 
Internet access 'a human right'

Almost four in five people around the world believe that access to the internet is a fundamental right, a poll for the BBC World Service suggests.

The survey - of more than 27,000 adults across 26 countries - found strong support for net access on both sides of the digital divide.

Countries such as Finland and Estonia have already ruled that access is a human right for their citizens.

International bodies such as the UN are also pushing for universal net access.

"The right to communicate cannot be ignored," Dr Hamadoun Toure, secretary-general of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), told BBC News.

"The internet is the most powerful potential source of enlightenment ever created."

He said that governments must "regard the internet as basic infrastructure - just like roads, waste and water".

"We have entered the knowledge society and everyone must have access to participate."

The survey, conducted by GlobeScan for the BBC, also revealed divisions on the question of government oversight of some aspects of the net.

Web users questioned in South Korea and Nigeria felt strongly that governments should never be involved in regulation of the internet. However, a majority of those in China and the many European countries disagreed.

In the UK, for example, 55% believed that there was a case for some government regulation of the internet.

Rural retreat

The finding comes as the UK government tries to push through its controversial Digital Economy Bill.

As well as promising to deliver universal broadband in the UK by 2012, the bill could also see a so-called "three strikes rule" become law.

This rule would give regulators new powers to disconnect or slow down the net connections of persistent illegal file-sharers. Other countries, such as France, are also considering similar laws.

A season of reports from 8-19 March 2010 exploring the extraordinary power of the internet, including:
# Digital giants - top thinkers in the business on the future of the web
#

Recently, the EU adopted an internet freedom provision, stating that any measures taken by member states that may affect citizen's access to or use of the internet "must respect the fundamental rights and freedoms of citizens".

In particular, it states that EU citizens are entitled to a "fair and impartial procedure" before any measures can be taken to limit their net access.

The EU is also committed to providing universal access to broadband. However, like many areas around the world the region is grappling with how to deliver high-speed net access to rural areas where the market is reluctant to go.

Analysts say that is a problem many countries will increasingly have to deal with as citizens demand access to the net.

The BBC survey found that 87% of internet users felt internet access should be the "fundamental right of all people".

More than 70% of non-users felt that they should have access to the net.

Overall, almost 79% of those questioned said they either strongly agreed or somewhat agreed with the description of the internet as a fundamental right - whether they currently had access or not.

Free speech

Countries such as Mexico, Brazil and Turkey most strongly support the idea of net access as a right, the survey found.

More than 90% of those surveyed in Turkey, for example, stated that internet access is a fundamental right - more than those in any other European Country.

South Korea - the most wired country on Earth - had the greatest majority of people (96%) who believed that net access was a fundamental right. Nearly all of the country's citizens already enjoy high-speed net access.

The survey also revealed that the internet is rapidly becoming a vital part of many people's lives in a diverse range of nations.

In Japan, Mexico and Russia around three-quarters of respondents said they could not cope without it.

Most of those questioned also said that they believed the web had a positive impact, with nearly four in five saying it had brought them greater freedom.

However, many web users also expressed concerns. The dangers of fraud, the ease of access to violent and explicit content and worries over privacy were the most concerning aspects for those questioned.

A majority of users in Japan, South Korea and Germany felt that they could not express their opinions safely online, although in Nigeria, India and Ghana there was much more confidence about speaking out.
 
2. If "life" is proclaimed to be one of the rights, why is "death" not considered a right? Suicide is still considered a crime if I'm not mistaken. Why should it be a crime if you do it quietly without interfering with causing others inconvenience?

i suppose your body can just disintegrate without smelling bad to your neighbours and do not require the services of police and the morgue? or even undertakers?

3. Do you think privacy should also be considered a "right"? Do you think you have privacy? If that's the case, should you have the right to say no or decline any questions from anyone, including the police, unless they have reason to believe you are involved in a crime?
Do you have a right to decline questions from anyone including surveys, census, salesmen, charity salesmen and even pranksters making tv programmes like Just For Laughs?

Of course if the state demands it for criminal investigations, you must surrender your privacy.....but other trivial purposes, your privacy must be respected....little did anybody know that Google is collecting information about you without your knowledge when you perform searches and sooner or later they will have the profile of every single person on the planet with internet connections...

There goes your privacy....:D
 
This is what Americans always claim to be their "rights". At least I hear that from Larry Kudlow on CNBC.

I remember something about "...so as to achieve happiness, prosperity and progress for our nation." "For our nation" has the final say, not "for the people." The Americans have it as "of the people, by the people, for the people."
 
I remember something about "...so as to achieve happiness, prosperity and progress for our nation." "For our nation" has the final say, not "for the people." The Americans have it as "of the people, by the people, for the people."
Good points bro.
USA is for every person. SG is for the nation.
But back to my questions please. :)
 
Back
Top