Life altering symptoms after Covid Vaccine!!! Is it as safe as the authorities claim?

[Leongsam]

 

[eatshitndie]

i would complain too if i have a permanent erection.

 

[creampie]

Calling on Dr Porcupine aka @porcaputtana and Dr Dread aka @dredd to tell us these are ”rare” side effects ”the benefits outweigh the risks”, “anti vaxxers are socially irresponsible scum”. Typical responses of a doctor who has no answer to the clear evidence that vaxxing is deadly and not worth the risk in the face of a virus which has a mortality rate as low as the common flu.

What is clear is that the same thing that happened 50 years ago with Thalidomide is repeating itself on a global scale and is affecting everyone who takes the vaxx, not just pregnant women.

https://www.sciencemuseum.org.uk/objects-and-stories/medicine/thalidomide

It took five years for the connection between thalidomide taken by pregnant women and the impact on their children to be made. Not only did thalidomide change people’s lives, but it resulted in tighter drug testing and reporting of side-effects.

Thalidomide is a drug that was developed in the 1950s by the West German pharmaceutical company Chemie Grünenthal GmbH. It was originally intended as a sedative or tranquiliser, but was soon used for treating a wide range of other conditions, including colds, flu, nausea and morning sickness in pregnant women.
During early testing, researchers at the company found that it was virtually impossible to give test animals a lethal dose of the drug (based on the LD50 test). Largely based on this, the drug was deemed to be harmless to humans. Thalidomide was licensed in July 1956 for over-the-counter sale (no doctor’s prescription was needed) in Germany.

THALIDOMIDE IN THE MARKETPLACE​

Around the world, more and more pharmaceutical companies started to produce and market the drug under license from Chemie Grünenthal. By the mid-1950s, 14 pharmaceutical companies were marketing thalidomide in 46 countries under at least 37 different trade names.
In 1958, thalidomide was produced in the United Kingdom by The Distillers Company (Biochemicals) Ltd, under the brand names Distaval, Tensival, Valgraine and Asmaval. Their advertisement claimed that

Distaval can be given with complete safety to pregnant women and nursing mothers without adverse effect on mother or child.

Distaval (thalidomide) made by Chemie Grünenthal GmbH's British counterpart, 1958–1962.
Science Museum Group CollectionMore informationabout Distaval (thalidomide) made by Chemie Grünenthal GmbH's British counterpart, 1958–1962.
The drug was prescribed for a range of conditions including pneumonia, colds and flu and for relieving the symptom of nausea often experienced in early pregnancy.
One country that did not approve thalidomide for marketing and distribution was the USA, where it was rejected by the Food and Drug Administration.
Pharmacologist Frances Oldham Kelsey turned down several requests from the distributing company who did not provided clinical evidence to refute reports of patients who developed nerve damage in their limbs after long-term thalidomide use. This prevented the drug thalidomide from ever being used in the United States.

THALIDOMIDE AND PREGNANCY​

In the 1950s, scientists did not know that the effects of a drug could be passed through the placental barrier and harm a foetus in the womb, so the use of medications during pregnancy was not strictly controlled. And in the case of thalidomide, no tests were done involving pregnant women.
As the drug was traded under so many different names in 49 countries, it took five years for the connection between thalidomide taken by pregnant women and the impact on their children to be made. A UK Government warning was not issued until May 1962.

One reason why researchers and doctors were slow to make this connection was due to the wide range of changes to foetal development. Limbs, internal organs including the brain, eyesight and hearing could all be affected.
Later, they found that the impact on development was linked to when during pregnancy the drug was taken, and effects only occurred between 20 and 37 days after conception. After that, thalidomide had no effect on the foetus.
Another reason why it took so long to establish the link to thalidomide was that some of the damage caused by the drug was very similar to certain genetic conditions that affect the upper or lower limbs.

THE THALIDOMIDE SCANDAL​

The first time the link between thalidomide and its impact on development was made public was in a letter published in The Lancet from an Australian doctor William McBride, in 1961.
The drug was formally withdrawn by Chemie Grünenthal on 26 November 1961 and a few days later, on 2 December 1961, the UK distributors followed suit. However, it remained in many medicine cabinets under many different names.
In the few short years that thalidomide was available, it's estimated that over 10,000 babies were affected by the drug worldwide. Around half died within months of being born. The thalidomide babies who survived and their families live with the effects of the drug

 

[mojito]

i would complain too if i have a permanent erection.

The wife surely wouldn't complain.

 

[eatshitndie]

The wife surely wouldn't complain.

mistress for sure. mattress will complain.

 

[porcaputtana]

Calling on Dr Porcupine aka @porcaputtana and Dr Dread aka @dredd to tell us these are ”rare” side effects ”the benefits outweigh the risks”, “anti vaxxers are socially irresponsible scum”. Typical responses of a doctor who has no answer to the clear evidence that vaxxing is deadly and not worth the risk in the face of a virus which has a mortality rate as low as the common flu.

What is clear is that the same thing that happened 50 years ago with Thalidomide is repeating itself on a global scale and is affecting everyone who takes the vaxx, not just pregnant women.

https://www.sciencemuseum.org.uk/objects-and-stories/medicine/thalidomide

It took five years for the connection between thalidomide taken by pregnant women and the impact on their children to be made. Not only did thalidomide change people’s lives, but it resulted in tighter drug testing and reporting of side-effects.

Thalidomide is a drug that was developed in the 1950s by the West German pharmaceutical company Chemie Grünenthal GmbH. It was originally intended as a sedative or tranquiliser, but was soon used for treating a wide range of other conditions, including colds, flu, nausea and morning sickness in pregnant women.
During early testing, researchers at the company found that it was virtually impossible to give test animals a lethal dose of the drug (based on the LD50 test). Largely based on this, the drug was deemed to be harmless to humans. Thalidomide was licensed in July 1956 for over-the-counter sale (no doctor’s prescription was needed) in Germany.

THALIDOMIDE IN THE MARKETPLACE​

Around the world, more and more pharmaceutical companies started to produce and market the drug under license from Chemie Grünenthal. By the mid-1950s, 14 pharmaceutical companies were marketing thalidomide in 46 countries under at least 37 different trade names.
In 1958, thalidomide was produced in the United Kingdom by The Distillers Company (Biochemicals) Ltd, under the brand names Distaval, Tensival, Valgraine and Asmaval. Their advertisement claimed that



Distaval (thalidomide) made by Chemie Grünenthal GmbH's British counterpart, 1958–1962.
Science Museum Group CollectionMore informationabout Distaval (thalidomide) made by Chemie Grünenthal GmbH's British counterpart, 1958–1962.
The drug was prescribed for a range of conditions including pneumonia, colds and flu and for relieving the symptom of nausea often experienced in early pregnancy.
One country that did not approve thalidomide for marketing and distribution was the USA, where it was rejected by the Food and Drug Administration.
Pharmacologist Frances Oldham Kelsey turned down several requests from the distributing company who did not provided clinical evidence to refute reports of patients who developed nerve damage in their limbs after long-term thalidomide use. This prevented the drug thalidomide from ever being used in the United States.

THALIDOMIDE AND PREGNANCY​

In the 1950s, scientists did not know that the effects of a drug could be passed through the placental barrier and harm a foetus in the womb, so the use of medications during pregnancy was not strictly controlled. And in the case of thalidomide, no tests were done involving pregnant women.
As the drug was traded under so many different names in 49 countries, it took five years for the connection between thalidomide taken by pregnant women and the impact on their children to be made. A UK Government warning was not issued until May 1962.

One reason why researchers and doctors were slow to make this connection was due to the wide range of changes to foetal development. Limbs, internal organs including the brain, eyesight and hearing could all be affected.
Later, they found that the impact on development was linked to when during pregnancy the drug was taken, and effects only occurred between 20 and 37 days after conception. After that, thalidomide had no effect on the foetus.
Another reason why it took so long to establish the link to thalidomide was that some of the damage caused by the drug was very similar to certain genetic conditions that affect the upper or lower limbs.

THE THALIDOMIDE SCANDAL​

The first time the link between thalidomide and its impact on development was made public was in a letter published in The Lancet from an Australian doctor William McBride, in 1961.
The drug was formally withdrawn by Chemie Grünenthal on 26 November 1961 and a few days later, on 2 December 1961, the UK distributors followed suit. However, it remained in many medicine cabinets under many different names.
In the few short years that thalidomide was available, it's estimated that over 10,000 babies were affected by the drug worldwide. Around half died within months of being born. The thalidomide babies who survived and their families live with the effects of the drug

1. 8 billion doses of mRNA vaccines administered worldwide with no direct link mortality. Adverse effects like myocarditis are mild and self limiting . Ten times reduction in covid related mortality . Safety profile so well established FDA approved it for children . In the coming weeks MOH will offer below 12 for vaccination .

2. Entire economy crippled, healthcare resources threatened and elective procedures delayed just to keep ICU beds available for the higher risk unvaccinated . New variants driven by the unvaccinated and now threaten to shut the world down again .

3. So yes. Pro choice unvaccinated are a burden and embarrassment to society . Ill informed, uneducated and proudly ignorant. The world is fed up with you lot .

https://edition.cnn.com/2021/12/02/europe/germany-lockdown-covid-restrictions-intl/index.html

4. As of yesterday 96.4% of Singaporeans have been vaccinated . When the omicron vaccines are available the ministry is likely to mandate vaccination .

5. So in summary : 120% affirmative . Pro choice unvaccinated are filthy scums that should rightly be confined inside their rat holes . A menace to civilized society .

6. Thank you for your kind attention

 

[tanwahtiu]

i would complain too if i have a permanent erection.

Fucking hell u, don't think you have a manhood penis, or long enough to describe it as a man penis, clit size maybe...

 

[Leongsam]

1. 8 billion doses of mRNA vaccines administered worldwide with no direct link mortality. Adverse effects like myocarditis are mild and self limiting . Ten times reduction in covid related mortality . Safety profile so well established FDA approved it for children . In the coming weeks MOH will offer below 12 for vaccination .

2. Entire economy crippled, healthcare resources threatened and elective procedures delayed just to keep ICU beds available for the higher risk unvaccinated . New variants driven by the unvaccinated and now threaten to shut the world down again .

3. So yes. Pro choice unvaccinated are a burden and embarrassment to society . Ill informed, uneducated and proudly ignorant. The world is fed up with you lot .

https://edition.cnn.com/2021/12/02/europe/germany-lockdown-covid-restrictions-intl/index.html

4. As of yesterday 96.4% of Singaporeans have been vaccinated . When the omicron vaccines are available the ministry is likely to mandate vaccination .

5. So in summary : 120% affirmative . Pro choice unvaccinated are filthy scums that should rightly be confined inside their rat holes . A menace to civilized society .

6. Thank you for your kind attention

It's early day yet. There is no knowing what sort of devastation mRNA vaccines will cause further down the road. Thalidomide was touted as safe too and look what happened.

Perhaps it is better to be safe than sorry. Covid is very mild in most and the long term risk of the vaccines could be far worse.

 

[porcaputtana]

It's early day yet. There is no knowing what sort of devastation mRNA vaccines will cause further down the road. Thalidomide was touted as safe too and look what happened.

Perhaps it is better to be safe than sorry. Covid is very mild in most and the long term risk of the vaccines could be far worse.

Tons of scientific peer reviewed literature on the safety of mRNA vaccines by now.

You grew up in Sg so I assume you have some basic reading and comprehension skills.

Go read them. They are not difficult to understand.

 

[tobelightlight]

CDC and FDA can't help you. The only person that can help you is yourself. The lady start off with her video comment by saying vaccine do save life. This is her Darwin downfall. Vaccine don't save life, it seems like it can save it but no. You do not know the ingredients of the vaccines , of all vaccines. You have an immune system, don't forget that. She is on the verge of crying, this is what happen when you choose the Darwin path.

 

[Leongsam]

Tons of scientific peer reviewed literature on the safety of mRNA vaccines by now.

You grew up in Sg so I assume you have some basic reading and comprehension skills.

Go read them. They are not difficult to understand.

What is missing of course is the effects over time simply because the approval went through an accelerated process. Current peer reviewed literature is a snapshot of less than 18 months of proper data.

We have to ask ourselves whether the safety profile will look the same over 60 months. Perhaps it will and possibly it won't. Nobody knows and that is what is so scary.

Since the virus is so mild in most a judgement call has to be made as to whether vaccines are worth the risk. Current data says they are. Long term data may have us wishing vaccinations had been banned from the onset.

 

[porcaputtana]

What is missing of course is the effects over time simply because the approval went through an accelerated process. Current peer reviewed literature is a snapshot of less than 18 months of proper data.

We have to ask ourselves whether the safety profile will look the same over 60 months. Perhaps it will and possibly it won't. Nobody knows and that is what is so scary.

Since the virus is so mild in most a judgement call has to be made as to whether vaccines are worth the risk. Current data says they are. Long term data may have us wishing vaccinations had been banned from the onset.

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02483-w

mRNA tech has been in development for decades .

Read the article properly . Don't let your ego and ignorance get in the way like the other dimwits in your circus

 

[Leongsam]

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02483-w

mRNA tech has been in development for decades .

Read the article properly . Don't let your ego and ignorance get in the way like the other dimwits in your circus

Development does not provide the large scale data needed to properly evaluate safety and efficacy. The mass vaccination drive of 2021 is actually part of the evaluation process and the long term effects are yet to be determined. There have already been unpleasant surprises revealing that it took only a few months to find out that efficacy fell off a cliff very quickly. God only knows if there will far more deadly consequences just round the corner.

One can only hope that we do not have an almighty disaster on our hands.

In the meantime it would be best to err on the side of caution given that Covid is a mild disease in most.

 

[porcaputtana]

Development does not provide the large scale data needed to properly evaluate safety and efficacy. The mass vaccination drive of 2021 is actually part of the evaluation process and the long term effects are yet to be determined. There have already been unpleasant surprises revealing that it took only a few months to find out that efficacy fell off a cliff very quickly. God only knows if there will far more deadly consequences just round the corner.

One can only hope that we do not have an almighty disaster on our hands.

In the meantime it would be best to err on the side of caution given that Covid is a mild disease in most.

Certainly

Whatever you need to spin to keep your clowns howling with delight

 

[porcaputtana]

I was bored enough to watch through the whole video

You can hear chow keng NS men moan about the exact same symptoms every ICT

Classic example of a redneck woman seeking money by malingering . God bless the USA.

 

[Majulah]

It's early day yet. There is no knowing what sort of devastation mRNA vaccines will cause further down the road. Thalidomide was touted as safe too and look what happened.

Perhaps it is better to be safe than sorry. Covid is very mild in most and the long term risk of the vaccines could be far worse.

there are many reports of vaccinated people dying or suffering from serious side effects yet
advocates of mRNA vaccine said it is very safe woh . and boasted that 8 BILLION were administered, simply ignoring these reports.
, why are we not seeing every single vaxxed person suffering from serious side effect or dying.
the intention is not to wipe out the whole population of a country. if 85% of the population is vaxxed and everyone died or suffered from side effect
it becomes obvious that pfizer/moderna is poisonous. to fool the world , pfizer/moderna manufacture normal harmless but useless vaccine and poisonous
vaccines, maybe in the ration of 70/30 .Thats y they have the ridiculous clause of buyer country cannot donate the vaccines to another country.

 

[Leongsam]

Certainly

Whatever you need to spin to keep your clowns howling with delight

Please rate my spin. I try my best to come across as the voice of reason devoid of any particular agenda either way.

 

[Majulah]

Please rate my spin. I try my best to come across as the voice of reason devoid of any particular agenda either way.

that clown kept citing 'scientific publication' yet chose to ignore reports of people dying , suffering serious side effects after being vaccinated.

 

[creampie]

that clown kept citing 'scientific publication' yet chose to ignore reports of people dying , suffering serious side effects after being vaccinated.

Ya la he is a quack doctor. I wonder how much he and the rest of the MMTF advisors r being paid by the pharmaceutical lobby.

 

[hbk75]

1. 8 billion doses of mRNA vaccines administered worldwide with no direct link mortality. Adverse effects like myocarditis are mild and self limiting . Ten times reduction in covid related mortality . Safety profile so well established FDA approved it for children . In the coming weeks MOH will offer below 12 for vaccination .

2. Entire economy crippled, healthcare resources threatened and elective procedures delayed just to keep ICU beds available for the higher risk unvaccinated . New variants driven by the unvaccinated and now threaten to shut the world down again .

3. So yes. Pro choice unvaccinated are a burden and embarrassment to society . Ill informed, uneducated and proudly ignorant. The world is fed up with you lot .

https://edition.cnn.com/2021/12/02/europe/germany-lockdown-covid-restrictions-intl/index.html

4. As of yesterday 96.4% of Singaporeans have been vaccinated . When the omicron vaccines are available the ministry is likely to mandate vaccination .

5. So in summary : 120% affirmative . Pro choice unvaccinated are filthy scums that should rightly be confined inside their rat holes . A menace to civilized society .

6. Thank you for your kind attention

Ppl like u lied without blinking an eye. Becareful of karma