• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

LHL open live debate on Tuesday - 8pm - woh!

myfoot123

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Just heard the announcement from CNA that 8 people will be selected.

What will be expected?

- politically correct questions for politically correct answer.
- Question pre-selected from facebook - easy to answer type.
- Damage control stunt
- Heavily moderated in PAP owned media

The purpose for such "LIVE" Debate came about because LHL is sweating. PAP has done overwhelming damage to Singaporeans across the board. It has became too deep and too wide that they could have resolve our problems during their term in office but failed to listen to the people.

They gloated when we complained,
they called us lesser mortal when we questioned their extravagant lifestyle,
they called us chief grumbler when we wanted to share our view,
they said we have no spur in our hide in order to justify influx of cheap foreign trash and divided our country into various enclaves.
they said our national pledge is aspirations,
they admitted this is Singapore Inc and not a nation or country
they wanted us to be cheaper, better and faster so they can keep their obscene pay and 8 months bonuses among other perks.
they put up spy camera at Hong Lim parks, jailed our opposition parties, gazette popular blogs, censored "educational" films, deprived alternative voices a place to conduct talks.
They concluded that we are ignorant lot and took our credit for themselves.

They put up road gantries (even in heartland areas), medical mean testing, up GST, squeezed MRT, inflated HDB price, up utilities, and depressed our rice bowl and categorily broke their promises made in 2006 Election.

Now that election is looming - you see PAP praying at the temple, "begging" for forgiveness, bribed us with growth dividend, blackmailed the opposition ward residents, threatened us that we will become 2nd citizen, made tea for the old folks, carry babies, change light bulbs for the poor and requested that they be surrounded by photographers and reporters to wayang their "GREAT DEEDS" in their newspaper front pages.

Do you believe a single LIVE debate or forum can easily repair the last 5 years of sufferings inflicted on the people of Singapore, knowing that these MIW will resort to same bullying again after election is over.

Singaporeans only have ONE last chance in their life to break PAP deadlock. It is now or never. Only a fool will fall for PAP trick again.
 

coolguy

Alfrescian
Loyal
One thing that can be certain is that these "live Debate" shows enjoyed overwhelming viewerships.
Due to the success, Mediacorp has decided to ride the waves by hosting yet another such show,
this time by inviting the honorable LHL.
I am sure this time, the viewership will be one that Mediacorp has never seen happen in so many years.
 

seebaysong

Alfrescian
Loyal
This is classic case of pride goes before fall... Whenever he speaks there is calamity... He is palmer's shifu

One thing that can be certain is that these "live Debate" shows enjoyed overwhelming viewerships.
Due to the success, Mediacorp has decided to ride the waves by hosting yet another such show,
this time by inviting the honorable LHL.
I am sure this time, the viewership will be one that Mediacorp has never seen happen in so many years.
 

myfoot123

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
This is classic case of pride goes before fall... Whenever he speaks there is calamity... He is palmer's shifu

Remember similar arrangement made donkey years ago where LKY was placed in similar situation? He could not take the hard question and eventually someone was threatened on the spot, for posing OB question, to disclose his school and the guy quitted his job or was he made to resign thereafter?
 
Last edited:

Varuna

Alfrescian
Loyal
I find it a bit odd when he sent his subordinates to take on the opposition candidates in discussion forum while he himself takes on 12 members from the public. Should it not be the other way round such that he as PM takes greater responsibility and attend the discussion forum with opposition candidates instead? I will be impressed if any of the 12 representatives challenges him with the question, "Since you are sure of what is best for Singapore, do you think you have the confidence to do a live debate with CSJ on a one-to-one basis?"
 

IR123

Alfrescian
Loyal
Not all can shine in open live debate in front of an open audience not composed solely of 'yes-women-and-men'.
 
Last edited:

ivebert

Alfrescian
Loyal
Not all can shine in open live debate in front of an open audience not composed solely of 'yes-women-and-men'.

That has got to do with the education level of Sinkies
Do you know an eloquent Sinkie with Poly/distance learning degrees? Probably some but definitely not representative.

85% and above of Sinkies do not have university education and therefore it is clear that most have yes-sir peasants
 

IR123

Alfrescian
Loyal
That has got to do with the education level of Sinkies
Do you know an eloquent Sinkie with Poly/distance learning degrees? Probably some but definitely not representative.

85% and above of Sinkies do not have university education and therefore it is clear that most have yes-sir peasants


Nothing to do with sinkies. It has all to do with over-estimation of one's capabilities.
 

seebaysong

Alfrescian
Loyal
kekeke... that's the man... always hiding behind the scenes... dating back the cable car accident rescue... come out only when things are done successfully to take credit ... kekekeke...
pick out pple in public... wonder who they will be... pple who will clap and laugh happily at every stupid comment from him ?

I find it a bit odd when he sent his subordinates to take on the opposition candidates in discussion forum while he himself takes on 12 members from the public. Should it not be the other way round such that he as PM takes greater responsibility and attend the discussion forum with opposition candidates instead? I will be impressed if any of the 12 representatives challenges him with the question, "Since you are sure of what is best for Singapore, do you think you have the confidence to do a live debate with CSJ on a one-to-one basis?"
 

KuanTi01

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
"Live" debate in the PAP context means it is broadcast live only but not necessarily unscripted. PAP is King of Kiasuism and Kiasiism. Always out to "fix" the opposition and always out to win the GE using every means available.
 
Top