• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Latest on Chinese Anti-Carrier missiles

longbow

Alfrescian
Loyal
Seems like China making rapid progress. If successful, would make Taiwan Straits a no go zone for US Carriers.

China’s New Missile May Create a ‘No-Go Zone’ for U.S. Fleet Share Business ExchangeTwitterFacebook| Email | Print | A A A
By Tony Capaccio

Nov. 17 (Bloomberg) -- China’s military is close to fielding the world’s first anti-ship ballistic missile, according to U.S. Navy intelligence.

The missile, with a range of almost 900 miles (1,500 kilometers), would be fired from mobile, land-based launchers and is “specifically designed to defeat U.S. carrier strike groups,” the Office of Naval Intelligence reported.

Five of the U.S. Navy’s 11 carriers are based in the Pacific and operate freely in international waters near China. Their mission includes defending Taiwan should China seek to exercise by force its claim to the island democracy, which it considers a breakaway province.

The missile could turn this region into a “no-go zone” for U.S. carriers, said Andrew Krepinevich, president of the Center for Strategic and Budget Assessments in Washington.

Scott Bray, who wrote the ONI report on China’s Navy, said China has made “remarkable progress” on the missile. “In little over a decade, China has taken the program from the conceptual phase” to “near fielding a combat-ready missile,” he said. Bray’s report, issued in July, was provided to Bloomberg News on request.

China also is developing an over-the-horizon radar network to spot U.S. ships at great distances from its mainland, and its navy since 2000 has tripled to 36 from 12 the number of vessels carrying anti-ship weapons, Bray, the ONI’s senior officer for intelligence on China, said in an e-mail.

China’s Strategy

The new missile would support China’s “anti-access” strategy to detect and if necessary attack U.S. warships “at progressively greater distances” from its mainland, Krepinevich said.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates, in a Sept. 16 speech, said China’s “investments in anti-ship weaponry and ballistic missiles could threaten America’s primary way to project power and help allies in the Pacific -- particularly our forward bases and carrier strike groups.”

Admiral Gary Roughead, chief of U.S. naval operations, says the new Chinese missile was one factor in his 2008 decision to cut the DDG-1000 destroyer program from eight ships to three because the vessels lack a missile-defense capability.

The Navy instead plans to build up to seven more Lockheed Martin Corp. Aegis-class DDG-51 destroyers and equip them with the newest radar and missiles.

China’s ballistic missile “portends the sophistication of the threats that we’re going to see,” Roughead said in an interview earlier this year.

China has ground-tested the missile three times since 2006 and conducted no flight tests yet, Navy officials said.

‘Limited Capability’

General Xu Caihou, China’s No. 2 military official, played down the weapon’s significance.

“It is a limited capability” to meet “the minimum requirement of” China’s national security, Xu, vice chairman of China’s Central Military Commission, said in response to a question following an Oct. 26 speech in Washington.

Mark Stokes, an analyst who has studied the missile program, said the Navy’s assessment indicates China started to develop the weapon after the March 1996 Taiwan “crisis.” That’s when the Clinton administration sent two aircraft carriers and escort warships into the Taiwan Strait and the surrounding area after China fired missiles near the island before its presidential election, Stokes said.

Stokes just published a study of the weapon for the non- profit Project 2049 Institute in Arlington, Virginia, that studies Asia security issues.

Alter Rules

An article in the May 2009 edition of Proceedings, a magazine published by the U.S. Naval Institute, said the missile “could alter the rules in the Pacific and place U.S. Navy carrier strike groups in jeopardy.”

“The mere perception that China might have an anti-ship ballistic missile capability could be a game-changer, with profound consequences for deterrence, military operations and the balance of power in the Western Pacific,” the article said.

Paul Giarra, a defense consultant who studies China’s weapons, called the missile “a remarkably asymmetric Chinese attempt to control the sea from the shore.”

“No American military operations -- air or ground -- are feasible in a region where the U.S. Navy cannot operate,” Giarra, president of Global Strategies and Transformation, based in Herndon, Virginia, said in an e-mail.

The missiles are intended for launch to a general location where their guidance systems take over and spot carriers for attack with warheads intended to neutralize the ships’ threat by destroying aircraft on decks, launching gear and control towers, Giarra said.

The Pentagon, in its latest annual report on China’s military, for the first time included a sketch of the notional flight profile of the new Chinese missile but gave little additional detail.

Sky Wave

Bray said China has the initial elements of its new over- the-horizon radar that can provide the general location of U.S. vessels before launching the new missile.

Stokes said the so-called Sky Wave radar can spot U.S. vessels as far away as 1,860 miles (3,000 kilometers).

Unlike traditional radar that fires radio waves off objects straight ahead, over-the-horizon radar bounces signals off the ionosphere, the uppermost layer of the atmosphere, which can pick up objects at greater distances.

The radar is supplemented by reconnaissance satellites, another Navy official said, requesting anonymity. There are 33 in orbit and that number may grow to 65 by 2014, 11 of which would be capable of conducting ocean surveillance, he said.

To contact the reporters on this story: Tony Capaccio in Washington at [email protected]

Last Updated: November 16, 2009 16:11 ES
 

Watchman

Alfrescian
Loyal
Fire 100 or more conventional missiles at time interval .

No way any counter measures can be employed !
 

longbow

Alfrescian
Loyal
Ha ha. That is one of the advantages of being a land based system, you could technically fire off your entire arsenal.
 

singveld

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
task force have anti anti carrier missiles

amercia are now in their biggest economic problem since great depression, they got out of that one by ww2, they are very trigger happy now, try to start a war with amercia now.
 

longbow

Alfrescian
Loyal
Problem is that with WW2, all the advance industrialized nations were bombed to the ground with US remaining the sole country with its manufacturing capacity intact. So it was boom time charlie for the next 20 years.



task force have anti anti carrier missiles

amercia are now in their biggest economic problem since great depression, they got out of that one by ww2, they are very trigger happy now, try to start a war with amercia now.
 

motormafia

Alfrescian
Loyal
What the US Navy really fear is this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SS-N-22

It is a sure kill which PRC purchased from Russia, there is no effective counter-measure that the US got in their hands yet to intercept this deadly toy.

It maneuvers at random movement pattern in extremely high speed 2.5X speed of sound and the anti-missile system on all the US ships are incapable of calculating any effective firing solution to stop it before hitting the ship.

Nuke and conventional warheads can be mounted and they have versions that can be launched from air, sea, land and submarines.

For any and all of the 28 US carriers this missile is a one-for-one exchange, 100% kill as long as they are in range and had their locations exposed.

Even Iranian had purchased these for Russian.

Chinese also purchased SU-31 which Russians had really tested successfully penetrated US carrier air defense. A pair SU-31 flew over a US carrier 4 times in a surprised attack near Japan few years ago, after the famous Kursk sinking incident. The photos of panicked US carrier crews running on deck was captured by SU-31's torpedo sight and posted on internet. You can search for them.

4X fly pass by a pair of SU-31 means 8 torpedo hits on the carrier, 4 hits on each side. Torpedo can also be nuke tipped, which means 1 is enough.

However, sinking US carrier isn't the best thing PRC can do.

I read that their neutron warhead tactic is the most impressive against carriers. This warhead basically kill all forms of lives by strong radiations & plasma emission, but there is not much of heat and shock waves to destroy machineries and vehicles. It means carriers and all the arms on board can be captured intact. You nuke the carriers to kill all the combat forces on board, then your own crew will board it to capture it. No sinking! :wink:

Recycle!
 
Top