• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Kick US Navy Out Of OUR SGP! They are Nuke Hazard!

jumpmrt

Alfrescian
Loyal
Chance of US Navy Subs crashing in narrow Singapore waters which is much much smaller than Strait of Hormuz is GREAT. They can crash with either commercial ships, tankers to and fro Jurong Island, our RSN, or US navy themselves.

They had caused Nuclear Water LEAK Previously in our waters.

OUR DRINKING WATER! We drink from desalination plants!




http://sg.news.yahoo.com/ap/20090322/twl-ml-us-navy-ships-collide-ef375f8.html


2 US Navy vessels that collided arrives Bahrain
AP
AP - Sunday, March 22

MANAMA, Bahrain - A U.S. Navy submarine and amphibious ship arrived at a Bahrain port Saturday after colliding the day before in a strategic passageway in the Persian Gulf, the Navy said.

The two naval vessels were brought to the Mina Salman pier for futher damage assessment, the U.S. Fifth Fleet said in a statement. It said the cause of the collision was under investigation.

The USS Hartford, a nuclear-powered submarine, and the USS New Orleans, an amphibious ship, were heading to the port and were going in the same direction when they crashed before dawn Friday in the narrow Strait of Hormuz.

Fifteen sailors aboard the Hartford were slightly injured. Both ships were on regularly scheduled deployments to the region and conducting security operations, the Bahrain-based Fifth Fleet said.

New Orleans suffered a ruptured fuel tank, which resulted in a spill of approximately 25,000 gallons of diesel fuel in the Strait of Hormuz. The propulsion plant of the submarine was unaffected, the statement said.

Aerial searches revealed no signs that any fuel remained on the ocean's surface, the statement said.

The unusual collision between members of the same navy sparked a sudden rise in oil on Friday even though the strait remained open.
 
Last edited:

jumpmrt

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://news.asiaone.com/News/AsiaOne+News/Singapore/Story/A1Story20080825-84156.html


Reply by Defence Minister on submarine radiation leak
Mon, Aug 25, 2008
AsiaOne




REPLY BY MINISTER FOR DEFENCE TEO CHEE HEAN TO PARLIAMENTARY QUESTION ON THE REPORTED LEAK OF RADIOACTIVE WATER BY THE USS HOUSTON WHEN IT CALLED AT SINGAPORE IN SEPTEMBER 2006

On 1 August 2008, the media reported that the US nuclear-powered submarine USS Houston had been found to be leaking trace amounts of radioactive water. The leak had been discovered by the United States Navy during a routine dry dock maintenance of the submarine at Pearl Harbour Naval Shipyard in July 2008. The media noted that the US had informed Japan of the leak, as the United States Navy's investigations had determined that the USS Houston could have been leaking when the USS Houston made its port call in Sasebo, Japan in March 2008.

At that time, there was no information to suggest that the leak went beyond the port visit that the USS Houston had made in Sasebo, Japan. Nevertheless, as a precautionary measure, we had asked the US on 4 August 2008 for information about the leak. The USS Houston had last called at Singapore nearly two years ago from 22 to 26 September 2006. We also went through our own monitoring records for the period when the USS Houston was berthed in Singapore at Changi Naval Base.

On 7 August 2008, the US informed MINDEF that the USS Houston had been leaking trace amounts of radioactive water since June 2006. This suggested that the USS Houston could have been leaking during her port call at Changi Naval Base in September 2006. During this period, the USS Houston had also called on other ports in the region including Japan, Malaysia, and Guam.


The US informed us that after the initial detection of the leak and the report that the submarine had been leaking while in port in Japan, the United States Navy had conducted more tests to determine the extent and duration of the leak. The US informed us that through these tests, the United States Navy was able to determine that one of the USS Houston's shut valves was leaking water at a rate slightly above the United States Navy's Nuclear Propulsion Programme's stringent design specifications. The US told us that further tests by a specialised US government nuclear laboratory, Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory (KAPL), were required to determine the extent of radioactive material being leaked, as well as the duration of the leak. KAPL eventually determined that the leak could have begun as early as June 2006. The US also told us that KAPL confirmed that the trace amounts of radioactive water leaked were so low that the monitoring systems onboard the USS Houston could not detect the leak.

The US has assessed that the cumulative amount of radioactivity that could have been leaked in Changi Naval Base was approximately 0.095 micro curies. To put things into perspective, the US indicated that this was less than the amount of radioactivity found in a common smoke detector, and would not have any adverse effect on human health, marine life or the environment.

Apart from the information provided to us by the US, MINDEF has its own independent monitoring system. Since February 2003, MINDEF has put in place a round-the-clock Integrated Environment Monitoring System (IEMS) at Changi Naval Base. The IEMS takes readings of air quality, and water and sea-bed samples to determine the normal background environmental radiation level, and to detect whether there has been any abnormal level of radiation which may be of safety concern. The safety limits are set by our National Environment Agency's Centre of Radiation Protection and Nuclear Science.

While the USS Houston was in Singapore in September 2006, the IEMS did not show any abnormal readings. After the news of the USS Houston's leak in Japan broke, a review of the IEMS data for the period of the USS Houston's visit also confirmed that there were no abnormal readings recorded. Our IEMS has therefore provided independent verification that public safety was not compromised at any point during the USS Houston's port call in Singapore in September 2006. Our Defence Science Organisation scientists have also assessed that based on the figures provided by the United States Navy, the potential exposure is 100,000 times less than exposure from natural radiation in a year.

With the assurances from the US, verification from the data collected from our monitoring system and our own experts' assessments, I am confident that there was no adverse impact on public health, marine life or the environment as a result of the USS Houston's port call in Singapore in September 2006, and that the safety of Singaporeans was not compromised by the reported leak.
 

jumpmrt

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://www.water-technology.net/projects/tuas/


Tuas Seawater Desalination Plant - Seawater Reverse Osmosis (SWRO), Singapore
Email-Icon
Email Article

Print-Icon
Print

Link-to-us
Link To Us
key facts
Key Data
Plant type
Seawater Reverse Osmosis (SWRO)
Output capacity
136,380m³/d
RO treatment train
Two passes - first for DS removal, second to reduce boron levels
Energy recovery
Pelton wheel and pressure exchange type ERS
Product water treatment
Lime for pH correction, chlorine / ammonia for final disinfection, fluoride added
Brine stream disposal
Sea discharge via submerged outfall
Full specifications

Completed some three months ahead of schedule, Singapore's first desalination plant – the largest of its kind in Asia – ranks among the most energy efficient ever constructed, enabling it to achieve the lowest desalinated seawater price in the world. Opened in September 2005, within its first year of operation the plant has won a distinction in the 2006 Global Water Awards and two of the companies involved have gained industry honours for their work on the project.

At 110,000m3/day, the Tuas seawater reverse osmosis (SWRO) plant has sufficient capacity to meet around 10% of the national demand - and at a price which challenges the notion that desalination is a high-cost option. Based on a pre-defined formula, the water sale price varies monthly with prevailing fuel cost and annually with inflation. The initial tender figure was $0.78/m3 for 2005; in practice the plant's efficiency has meant that the actual first year selling price approaches half that.

The project cost was S$200m and project finance came from a S$165m loan facility, together with a S$35m equity investment from Hyflux. A syndicate of international banks was involved in funding the plant. The arrangement comprised a senior debt facility of up to S$158.5m to fund 80% of the project budget, with an associated contingency facility of up to S$6.5m which had been put in place to cover 70% of the costs in the event of an overrun. The balance was made up from the original Hyflux equity contributions into SingSpring.

BACKGROUND

The high population density of Singapore - over eight times the residents of Washington DC in an area little more than three and a half times bigger – makes sustainable water resources management of particular importance. Rainfall accounts for around 50% of the country's domestic supply, with the remainder chiefly imported from Malaysia – sources described as the traditional two "National Taps." In May 2002, the Singapore Public Utilities Board (PUB) announced an initiative to increase supply capacity by enlarging the water catchments area and at the same time increase these sources of supply.

However, seeking to move towards long-term self-sufficiency and to reduce its reliance on foreign supply, the board developed a strategy called the Four National Taps – adding reclaimed water as the third and desalination as the fourth.

Implementing this fourth tap began in January 2003, with the award of the 20-year design-build-own-operate (DBOO) contract to SingSpring – originally a joint venture consortium between Hyflux (70%) and the Ondeo Group, but subject to a Hyflux buy-out in June 2003.

Working in close collaboration with the engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) contractor Hydrochem (another wholly owned subsidiary of Hyflux), Black & Veatch designed the plant – selecting membrane technology as the most cost-effective approach. This, coupled with the use of proven and reliable pre-treatment processes able to function efficiently under all likely circumstances, ensured the inherent operational flexibility to allow optimised responses to fluctuations in both water demand and electricity price.

The groundbreaking ceremony took place on 16th January 2004, attended by Lim Swee Say, the country's Minister for the Environment. The plant was completed the following year and formally opened by Singapore's Prime Minister, Lee Hsien Loong, on 13th September 2005.


In March 2006, Black & Veatch received a project merit award from the Environmental Business Journal for its work on the plant. Later in the year, the Global Water Award judges recognised the facility itself with a distinction and named Hyflux their Water Company of the Year.

THE PLANT DESIGN

The plant design uses an open seawater intake structure, with two separate inlet channels each equipped with mechanical rake coarse screens. Growth inhibitors are added to the intake to reduce the potential for marine growth to accumulate around the screens, pipes and other structures. Further chemical dosing systems ensure adequate pH correction and enable the addition of polymer coagulants.

Chemical dechlorination takes place both upstream and downstream of the cartridge filters leading to the RO plant and any further adjustment of the pH can also be made downstream of the cartridge filters, as required.

Oil, grease and suspended solids are removed from the flow by dissolved air flotation (DAF), prior to the primary gravity sand filters (GSF) and the flow subsequently passes through secondary pressure sand filtration (PSF) before entering the reverse osmosis section of the plant.

The RO treatment process itself consists of two passes through the installed membrane batteries. On the first pass, dissolved solids are removed from the flow; the purpose of the second is to enable the RO units to reduce the boron level in the treated water.

One of the key factors in the economics of SWRO is energy usage – particularly relevant in the Tuas plant, since the monthly variable purchase price is predicated on fuel costs. The energy recovery system (ERS) at this facility, which has been designed with the specific intention of minimising operating costs, consists of a pelton wheel type system and pressure exchange energy recovery. The success of this approach is clear. At 4.1kWh/m3, the plant is one the most energy efficient ever built; the first year selling price of $0.48/m3 is the world's lowest for desalinated seawater.

Downstream of the RO process, dosing facilities introduce lime to the product water to control the pH and improve the taste, together with the chlorine and ammonia used for disinfection. Fluoride is also added. A series of treated water tanks hold the product prior to entering the main transmission line.

The brine stream discharges into the sea through a submerged outfall, the positioning and capacity of which was the subject of extensive assessment to mitigate its environmental impact.

Described as "a brilliant work of engineering" by the Global Water Award judges, the Tuas SWRO plant – one of the largest in the world – has an important role to play in Singapore’s drive to ensure the provision of sufficient water to meets future needs at an affordable cost.
KEY PLAYERS

The contract was awarded by the Singapore Public Utilities Board (PUB) and the DBOO contractor is SingSpring, a wholly owned subsidiary of Hyflux. Black & Veatch were responsible for the design and permitting stages, also providing support services during construction, commissioning and operation. The EPC contractor was Hydrochem.

The syndicate of banks involved in the loan financing are DBS Bank, KBC Bank, ING Bank and Standard Chartered Bank, with DBS acting as the lead arranger. Hunton & Williams provided project and finance advice.


Expand Image Expand Image
The use of desalination can no longer be automatically viewed as a costly option. The high efficiency of the Tuas SWRO facility has resulted in the world's cheapest product water.


Expand Image Expand Image
Aerial view of the Tuas plant. Singapore's first desalination facility, it can supply 10% of the country's needs.


Expand Image Expand Image
Bottles of NEWater for distribution at a public exhibition during the National Day Parade celebrations 2005. Singapore’s Four National Tap strategy involves rainfall, imported water, reclaimed water and desalination to meet its growing needs.


Expand Image Expand Image
Singapore’s Prime Minister, Lee Hsien Loong, opened the plant in September 2005. The move towards making greater use of desalinated water has been driven by governmental targets to ensure affordable self-sustainability.


Expand Image Expand Image
Singapore is less than 700km2 in area, of which only around 10km2 is water. Limited natural fresh water resources – and the high population density – make sourcing alternative supplies of potable water of great national importance.
 
Last edited:

Hakka Tiow

Alfrescian
Loyal
Mr, sorry lah. Lee Kuan Yew without USA will be penkanged by our surrounding singapore admirers. Changi naval base for singapore navy?
 

jumpmrt

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://www.chinapost.com.tw/asia/2005/09/14/68582/Desalination-plant.htm

Desalination plant opens in Singapore
For decades, Singapore has relied on Malaysia to supply a huge portion of a vital resource: water.

But the two neighbors sometimes disagree, and resource-scarce Singapore wants to be less reliant. Aiming for self-sufficiency in water, Singapore says its first desalination plant — billed as one of the biggest in the world — will meet at least 10 percent of the nation’s water needs.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong opened the facility Tuesday with fanfare, and reminded his citizens to conserve their resources.

“Water is for us not an inexhaustible gift of nature, but a precious fruit of our efforts which we must husband and use wisely,” Lee said at a ceremony held at the plant. “Our combined efforts have turned our vulnerability into a strength.”

At the reception, guests sipped from bottles of “Desal H2O,” a product of the facility, and peered into decorative glass jars where goldfish darted about in desalinated water. Fireworks soared overhead.

Singapore is also hosting an international forum this week on desalination and water reuse, attended by more than 700 delegates from 42 countries, including some from the Middle East.

The plant, worth 200 million Singapore dollars (US$119 million; euro96.65 million), will churn out 136,380 cubic meters (4,815,678 cubic feet) of potable water from sea water daily. The fresh water will be pumped into the city-state’s mains, which are currently supplied from catchment areas, recycled sewage and Malaysian imports.

Singapore imports half its water from Malaysia, and has made self sufficiency in water into a national priority amid a dispute with its neighbor over how much it should pay for the imports. The city-state’s water agreements with Malaysia expire by 2061.

At the desalination plant, dissolved salts in seawater are extracted by forcing the water through plastic membranes with microscopic pores. Silt is removed by dousing the seawater with chemicals that coagulate the particles.

In 2003, Singapore started recycling and purifying sewage water to boost supply.

The country’s environment minister, Yaacob Ibrahim, has said Singapore wants to turn 90 percent of its main island into fresh water catchment areas. About half of Singapore is currently used as catchment areas for rainwater collection.
 

ahleebabasingaporethief

Alfrescian
Loyal
Remember last year when they closed Pasir Ris beach and all our news were blaming Malaysian companies in Johor for the "dirty" waters citing all kinds of viral and viruses in the water.

It was "LEAKED" in Okinawa, Japan that one of the US Nuclear submarines was leaking nuclear waste into their waters. The same report said that the same submarine also docked at CHANGI.

Thank GOD for the internet. If not, we will never know.

Many in coffeeshops in Singapore were already talking about it. They know already lah.

But what to do.

Yes there definitely some concern given the water situation and our small size. Ever wonder why we have high colon and stomach cancers?

I hate to say this but could it be the more sick there are the more money they make? It's really a BIG industry isn't it, healthcare I mean.


If there was one nuclear accident on board any of the US nuclear ships docked in Singapore, half the island if not the whole island will be fucked.

Scary thought.

So pick your home of choice in Singapore. Changi (nuclear) naval base in the EAST or WEST with Jurong Island and all its pollutants?
 
Last edited:

flkyflky

Alfrescian
Loyal
US military is soon going to make a major major fuckup here in Singapore that will be high death toll and costly damages suffered by Singaporean. Just watch out!:(
 

jumpmrt

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/europ...e.incident/index.html?imw=Y&iref=mpstoryemail

art.uksub.jpg


art.uksub.jpg




British, French nuclear submarines collide


LONDON, England (CNN) -- A British Royal Navy nuclear submarine and its French equivalent collided while on operations in the Atlantic Ocean earlier this month, defense ministries in Paris and London confirmed Monday.
The British Royal Navy submarine HMS Vanguard.

The British Royal Navy submarine HMS Vanguard.
Click to view previous image
1 of 2
Click to view next image

Both vessels, HMS Vanguard and Le Triomphant, were armed with nuclear warheads and suffered damage but were able to return to port under their own power following the collision.

"Two "SNLE" (nuclear submarines), one French and the other British, were, a few days ago, on standard patrols in the Atlantic. They briefly came in contact in a very slow speed while they were immersed," the French Ministry of Defense said in a statement.

"There is no casualty or injury among the crew. Neither the nuclear deterrent mission nor the nuclear security have been compromised."

In an earlier press release issued on February 6, the Ministry of Defense said the vessel's sonar dome had been damaged in a collision. The vessel was able to return to its base at Ile Longue in Brittany, northwest France, accompanied by a frigate.

The UK's Ministry of Defence also confirmed the incident. In a statement, the First Sea Lord Admiral Sir Jonathan Band said the collision occurred during "routine national patrols." Video Watch Band describe "slow-speed impact" »

"Both submarines remained safe and no injuries occurred. We can confirm that the capability remained unaffected and there has been no compromise to nuclear safety," Band said.

HMS Vanguard returned to its home base at Faslane in Scotland on February 14. The UK's Sun newspaper reported that dents and scrapes were visible on the vessel's hull as it was towed into dock by a tugboat.

Both the UK and French nuclear deterrent operations depend on complete secrecy, despite both countries' membership of NATO. But naval analyst Richard Cobbold told CNN that procedures would be in place to ensure that French and British submarines were routinely kept apart.

"Either one of these submarines was doing something different or somebody made a mistake -- but we don't know that," Cobbold said. Video Watch why the collision is an embarrassment for both the British and the French »

Both submarines were equipped with state-of-the-art sonar technology, but Cobbold said it was possible that neither was aware of the close proximity of the other vessel.

"Modern submarines are very, very quiet. In many types of water conditions they might not hear the approach of another submarine," he said.

But with both nations keeping at least one nuclear-armed submarine constantly at sea for the past 40 years, he said it was no surprise that they had eventually ended up in the same area of ocean.

"Even in an ocean the size of the North Atlantic the submarines are eventually going to be in the same patch of water at the same time," he said.

In a statement issued Monday, the UK-based Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament described the incident as "a nuclear nightmare of the highest order."

"The collision of two submarines, both with nuclear reactors and nuclear weapons onboard could have released vast amounts of radiation and scattered scores of nuclear warheads across the seabed," said CND chair Kate Hudson.

"The dents reportedly visible on the British sub show the boats were no more than a couple of seconds away from total catastrophe."

Hudson said the incident was the most serious involving a nuclear submarine since the sinking of the Russian Kursk in 2000 with the loss of the vessel's entire 118-man crew.
Don't Miss

* Navy says sub leaked radiation since 2006

HMS Vanguard, which was launched in 1992, is one of four submarines which make up the UK's nuclear deterrent. Its firepower includes 16 Trident II D5 missiles capable of delivering multiple warheads to targets up to a range of 4,000 nautical miles.

The 150-meter vessel carries a crew of 141 and is powered by a uranium-fueled pressurized water reactor. Vanguard Class submarines routinely spend weeks at a time underwater on patrol in the North Atlantic.

But contact with naval commanders and government officials, including the defense secretary and the prime minister, is maintained at all times by a "comprehensive network of communications installations," the Royal Navy Web site said.

Le Triomphant was launched in 1994 and entered service in 1997 with a crew of 111, according to the GlobalSecurity.org Web site. Its weapons include 16 M45 missiles capable of launching multiple nuclear warheads.
advertisement

The UK has maintained a nuclear arsenal since 1956, with at least one nuclear-armed submarine somewhere at sea continuously since 1969.

In 2006 the government approved plans to develop a new generation of nuclear weapon-carrying submarines which is due to be ready to replace the Vanguard Class by 2024. But the program, which is expected to cost around £20 billion ($29 billion), has been heavily criticized by anti-nuclear campaigners.
 

besotted

Alfrescian
Loyal
Many Singaporeans are Pinkertions and love to worship the arrogant and deceitful white men

As President Lula of Brazil said, the white men with blue eyes have caused the world's economic system to collpase, yet they think it fit to lecture others on what to do

Please, Singaporeans wake up, un-Pinky yourself or do you want to spend the rest of your lives being screwed by Western values
 

angie II

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Many Singaporeans are Pinkertions and love to worship the arrogant and deceitful white men

As President Lula of Brazil said, the white men with blue eyes have caused the world's economic system to collpase, yet they think it fit to lecture others on what to do

Please, Singaporeans wake up, un-Pinky yourself or do you want to spend the rest of your lives being screwed by Western values


Hey cheater, u & your endless ranting.. how are your phantom employees?

People here are expecting yr reply in the thread below. Are u feeling guilty, scared of being exposed & avoiding it? :rolleyes:


http://www.sammyboy.com/showthread.php?t=22411
 
Last edited:

Papsmearer

Alfrescian (InfP) - Comp
Generous Asset
The danger is not that the USN vessels could leak nuclear contamination in s'pore. The danger is because there is such a large presence of US Naval personnel on the island that we could be targets of a terrorist attack. They would love to attack clubs that navy personnel hang out in or even attack the ships themselves while in port. In fact the JI that was caught were filming US Navy personnel for attack. In addition, we have custom build changi docks for their aircraft carrier, and spend a lot of taxpayer money to make the US navy comfortable here. They should leave for this reasons not for any remote leak of nuclear material.
 

HongKanSeng

Alfrescian
Loyal
Many Singaporeans are Pinkertions and love to worship the arrogant and deceitful white men

As President Lula of Brazil said, the white men with blue eyes have caused the world's economic system to collpase, yet they think it fit to lecture others on what to do

Please, Singaporeans wake up, un-Pinky yourself or do you want to spend the rest of your lives being screwed by Western values

read:
http://sammyboy.com/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=203169


Exclamation Re: US Secret War, Laos, Thailand, Humanity Alert
There are many people in this world who became running dogs for USA and then got betrayed and back-stabbed by the USA.

Recently Georgia was ravaged by Russian troops after they listened to USA and try to fight Moscow. Entire country was nearly destroyed.

Iraq fought Iran for USA, see what happened to Iraq today.

Taliban fought against Soviet for the USA in Afghanistan, see what happened to them after that? Like Iraqis & Saddam they are destroyed and killed by USA.

South Vietnam fought for the USA against their own northern brothers also, and when Viet-Cong overran Saigon city, the Americans took their own flight and left millions of their Vietnamese allies behind, betrayed and captured by Viet-Cong enemy. They are killed and tortured by Viet-Cong while USA celebrated the end of Vietnam war & the survival of their own soldiers.

Bush senior asked the Shiite Muslims of southern Iraq to up rise against Saddam Hussein, and promised to send troops in to assist them. In the end they suffered huge losses and not a single US troop arrived. Similarly in north of Iraq, Bush asked the Kurdish people to up rise against Saddam Hussein, and same empty promises to support them. In the end? They are betrayed by USA without any help. Saddam sent Chemical Ali with tanks etc, nearly wiped out all the Kurds people. Until today, the Turkish still enters north Iraq to kill Kurds and USA does next to nothing.

South America many many similar examples, Contra Rebles etc, were betrayed and back-stabbed by Reagan govt. Hundreds of thousands died in false believe of American Democracy.

Americans troops betrayed their own GIs in Vietnam, they also shot their own officers.

John F Kennedy had left about 2000 FBI/CIA agents and American troops in Cuba's famous Bay of Pig invasion. Betraying their own soldiers to be captured by Castro's army.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bay_of_Pigs_Invasion

http://www.historyofcuba.com/history/funfacts/giron.htm


Americans are such bastard betrayers in the name of Freedom & Democracy, and stupid people dreaming of Freedom & Democracy had believed in them.

Stupid PAP & Lee Kuan Yew still also believe in American Forces to keep Singapore safe. Buying US weapons hoping to fight with Malaysia & Indonesia. Really Ass Hole!
 
Top