- Joined
- Jul 14, 2008
- Messages
- 89,608
- Points
- 113
Nowadays, can we really get justice.
A woman sits on a public bus, a man comes and sits very close to her. She asks him to give her some space, he inches even closer. Then he hits her, while the passengers in the upper deck just watch. Only a 22 year old man from the lower deck comes to help her.
A local guy gets into a dispute with a Saudi Arabian diplomat over parking in restricted lots. Apparently a scuffle ensures. The guy is asked to resolve the matter privately. Or make a "magistrate's report". Apparently, the police will only get involved if elderly or young children are involved. So anyone who is not an elderly or a child cannot be assaulted or made a victim?
A cabbie and a newspaper editor are involved in road accidents with very similar circumstances. In both cases, a pedestrian died. But the punishment and the sentences seem to be very different.
Is it about time that some form of vigilante justice is enforced?
No violence, but only as a form of self defence if the "perp" gets violent first.
The word "perp" is short form for "perpetuator", which is commonly used in American police dramas, because these people who think they are above the law are effectively "perps".
Even in minor cases where scumbags put their feet on your chair in the cinema, cut their toenails in public transport, eat and drink merrily on public transport, behave like thugs, gangsters or spoilt brats in public places, just because they think they can get away with it or are not concerned about the fines.
Will taking them on if the authorities are not able or willing to, be considered "justified"?
As deputy marshall Raylan Givens said "He pulled, I shot him. It was justified."
A woman sits on a public bus, a man comes and sits very close to her. She asks him to give her some space, he inches even closer. Then he hits her, while the passengers in the upper deck just watch. Only a 22 year old man from the lower deck comes to help her.
A local guy gets into a dispute with a Saudi Arabian diplomat over parking in restricted lots. Apparently a scuffle ensures. The guy is asked to resolve the matter privately. Or make a "magistrate's report". Apparently, the police will only get involved if elderly or young children are involved. So anyone who is not an elderly or a child cannot be assaulted or made a victim?
A cabbie and a newspaper editor are involved in road accidents with very similar circumstances. In both cases, a pedestrian died. But the punishment and the sentences seem to be very different.
Is it about time that some form of vigilante justice is enforced?
No violence, but only as a form of self defence if the "perp" gets violent first.
The word "perp" is short form for "perpetuator", which is commonly used in American police dramas, because these people who think they are above the law are effectively "perps".
Even in minor cases where scumbags put their feet on your chair in the cinema, cut their toenails in public transport, eat and drink merrily on public transport, behave like thugs, gangsters or spoilt brats in public places, just because they think they can get away with it or are not concerned about the fines.
Will taking them on if the authorities are not able or willing to, be considered "justified"?
As deputy marshall Raylan Givens said "He pulled, I shot him. It was justified."