If I didn't recall wrongly, there seems to be a ruling that buying thinner requires a person to provide his/her particular. Can any bros/sis out here verify this?
With this incident, I'm going to guess more regulations will be in place.
One thing to note, the burnt man is a MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT, not a MINISTER. So what's the big deal? Burnt one, get another as replacement! That's what PAP is good at anyways. :oIo: