• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 4/2009: 23-46

khunking

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
2,039
Points
0
Singapore: The Politics of Inventing
National Identity
Stephan Ortmann
Abstract: This study wants to shed new light on the politics of Singapore’s
national identity invention. Since independence in 1965, the Singaporean
government has tried to generate a sense of national identity in Singapore.
While at first, the priority was on pragmatic values to promote the economic
development, this changed in the late 1980s when the government became
concerned with the widespread materialism within the society. As an alterna-
tive, so-called Asian values sought to provide an ideological alternative and a
new basis for a stronger national identity. At the same time, average Singa-
poreans have developed their own unique conceptions of the city-state’s
national identity, which sometimes contradict the official nation-building
efforts and thus constitute a subtle form of opposition. Many Singaporeans
demand greater participation in the negotiation of their Singaporean identity,
which demonstrates the difficulty of constructing a sustainable authoritarian
civic national identity.

http://jacob69.wordpress.com/2010/01/15/singapore-the-politics-of-inventing-national-identity/
 
Back
Top