"Mr Low also suggested that the scheme will simply benefit profitable companies that have no intention of retrenching workers."
according to the paps, this scheme helps unstable companies to sustain temporary so that drastic retrenchment wouldn't be enforced. contrary to its well-intended effort, it also helps profitable companies which are paying obscene salaries to their directors maybe at the expense of wage-cut employees. isn't that a hidden exploitation of the JOB CREDIT?
take for example, NTUC COMFORT. the cab-drivers are literally working for free and making money for NTUC. the directors are drawing millions but what responsiblities they are holding or relate themselves to such pays are never revealed. and NTUC is a trade union for employees. see the contradiction and direct slap in the face here?
with JOB CREDIT now in place, aren't the overly well-paid directors stand to gain more?
maybe this scheme should be fine tuned in such a way that profitable companies should be restricted from receiving aids.
again, using NTUC COMFORT, they have reported big profits every year. at times like this, shouldn't they be lowering their exoectation and help the cab drivers in ways like taxi rental reductions and more service bonuses package payout to hardworking cab-drivers who clock targeted "cab driving manhour".
they should also reduce cab fares to aid commuters in this dire situation. in short, since it's a trade union, their profits shouldn't be too overwhelming. it should be fairly disembursed back to the self-employed cab drivers and also the public.
by the way, many gov linked companies form a bigger share of the employers' pie which means they are the ones who benefitted most. those companies that have paps mps or generals sitting there as figureheads directors are most probably glc but conveniently registered as public listed firms.
according to the paps, this scheme helps unstable companies to sustain temporary so that drastic retrenchment wouldn't be enforced. contrary to its well-intended effort, it also helps profitable companies which are paying obscene salaries to their directors maybe at the expense of wage-cut employees. isn't that a hidden exploitation of the JOB CREDIT?
take for example, NTUC COMFORT. the cab-drivers are literally working for free and making money for NTUC. the directors are drawing millions but what responsiblities they are holding or relate themselves to such pays are never revealed. and NTUC is a trade union for employees. see the contradiction and direct slap in the face here?
with JOB CREDIT now in place, aren't the overly well-paid directors stand to gain more?
maybe this scheme should be fine tuned in such a way that profitable companies should be restricted from receiving aids.
again, using NTUC COMFORT, they have reported big profits every year. at times like this, shouldn't they be lowering their exoectation and help the cab drivers in ways like taxi rental reductions and more service bonuses package payout to hardworking cab-drivers who clock targeted "cab driving manhour".
they should also reduce cab fares to aid commuters in this dire situation. in short, since it's a trade union, their profits shouldn't be too overwhelming. it should be fairly disembursed back to the self-employed cab drivers and also the public.
by the way, many gov linked companies form a bigger share of the employers' pie which means they are the ones who benefitted most. those companies that have paps mps or generals sitting there as figureheads directors are most probably glc but conveniently registered as public listed firms.
