• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Jail for wearing T-shirt

myo539

Alfrescian
Loyal
SINGAPORE: The three Singaporeans who have been found guilty of contempt of court in the kangaroo T-shirt case have been sentenced to jail.

http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/392576/1/.html

Since wearing a cartoon kangaroo T-shirt is an offence inside a court, is it an offence to wear a kangaroo T-shirt outside the court - I mean in food courts, Courts stores and any hotel courtyards - or even walking down Orchard Road? I wonder.

For that matter, shouldn't we censor or ban the popular "Singapore is a fines City" T-shirt?

To be absolutely safe, wear an all-white T-shirt - lagi better with a Thunder and Lightning logo.:biggrin:
 

ahbengsong

Alfrescian
Loyal
A kangaroo court or kangaroo trial, sometimes likened to a drumhead court-martial, is a sham legal proceeding or court. The colloquial phrase "kangaroo court" is used to describe judicial proceedings that deny due process rights in the name of expediency. Such rights include the right to summon witnesses, the right of cross-examination, the right not to incriminate oneself, the right not to be tried on secret evidence, the right to control one's own defense, the right to exclude evidence that is improperly obtained, irrelevant or inherently inadmissible (e.g. hearsay), the right to exclude judges or jurors on the grounds of partiality or conflict of interest, and the right of appeal. The outcome of a trial by "kangaroo court" is essentially determined in advance, usually for the purpose of providing a conviction, either by going through the motions of manipulated procedure or by allowing no defense at all.
 

ahbengsong

Alfrescian
Loyal
singaporeroo_wideweb__470x308,0.jpg
 

ahbengsong

Alfrescian
Loyal
lky once said he has a letter from the IBA praising the singapore judiciary.. but later found to be untrue... the IBA questions the lack of judiciary independence in pap singapore...

so are the trio wrong in expessing the opinion of the IBA ?... why didnt the pap bring the IBA to court ??.. bullying its own and afraid of the strong ??.. c'mon pap... you lack the moral and ethics to govern singapore so admit it...

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ PAP $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$


International Bar Association gives Singapore dismal grade in free expression, human rights, independence of courts
10 July 2008
Source: Southeast Asian Press Alliance (SEAPA)

The International Bar Association's (IBA) Human Rights Institute (IBAHRI) on 08 July 2008 released a study assailing the Singaporean government on its human rights standards and records, and underscoring the city-state's severe "limitations on the freedoms of expression, assembly, and the press, and of the independence of the judiciary".

The report, titled, "Prosperity Versus Individual Rights? Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law in Singapore", concludes that "democratic debate and media comment are extremely restricted (in Singapore) and government officials have initiated numerous successful defamation suits against both political and media critics."

The Singaporean courts are notorious for slapping staggering penalties on media organizations, journalists, and oppositionists found guilty of defaming Singapore's leaders, and the IBAHRI report suggests that a judiciary vulnerable to executive influence is largely to blame for the fact, as well as the chilling effect it brings to Singaporean society. "There are concerns about an actual or apparent lack of impartiality and independence", in cases involving "the interests of People's Action Party (PAP) members or their associates", the report says. PAP's leaders -- headlined by its past and current prime ministers, Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew, former PM Goh Chok Tong, and current PM Lee Hsien Loong -- over the decades have won apologies and millions of dollars in penalties from defamation suits targetting oppositionists and international media organizations such as the Asian Wall Street Journal, the Far Eastern Economic Review, Time, Newsweek, Asiaweek, International Herald Tribune, and The Economist. The leader of the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), Dr. Chee Soon Juan, and his sister, Siok Chin, have been bankrupted by the courts for their inability to pay the hefty fines brought upon them by defamation suits filed by the Lees.

The IBA represents 30,000 lawyers worldwide, and ironically held its annual convention in Singapore just last October. The IBA says its investigations for the report began prior to that conference, and continued as "strong debate between the government and its critics took place during the IBA's inaugural Rule of Law Day." Emilio Cแrdenas, Co-Chair of the IBAHRI, said the IBAHRI had "sought the views of all the major stakeholders concerned, including the Singapore Government and the Singapore Law Society." The organization's 72-page report says Singapore's human rights and free expression record "failed to meet international standards", raising "concerns about the independence of its judiciary". Singapore's rules and the jurisprudence on cases brought against critics of government and leaders of the ruling PAP creates a restrictive environment for free expression, free assembly, and the political activities of oppositionists, the IBAHRI concludes.

Among other key recommendations, the IBAHRI said Singapore should ratify the United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, ease restrictions on the media, and carry out reforms in the judiciary to ensure that its courts are free from government influence, particularly in cases involving leading political figures.

IBA's statement is found here: http://www.ibanet.org/iba/article.cfm?article=178
A PDF of its report may be downloaded here: http://www.ibanet.org/images/downlo...apore-Prosperity_versus_individual_rights.pdf
 

theblackhole

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset

these guys are simply committing hari kiri in courts...no cow sense lah! want to protest also protest legally lah! anyhow hamtam sure kena what!


knn! you go to a sacred place and shit and spit around...sure kena what!!! bodohs!!!
 

xebay11

Alfrescian
Loyal
these guys are simply committing hari kiri in courts...no cow sense lah! want to protest also protest legally lah! anyhow hamtam sure kena what!


knn! you go to a sacred place and shit and spit around...sure kena what!!! bodohs!!!

How to protest legally?
 

theblackhole

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
How to protest legally?

speaker's corner.st forum.write to your mps.write to mm,sm and pm...and protest legally in one thousand and one ways without being fined,jailed and condemned. do things legally in singapore and follow law. that's the only way to protest legally. don't go mocking the courts and banging your heads...and talking nonsense calling judges prostitutes. you just ask for it.hang yourself.surely die one. learn to play the rules fairly and legally.
 

singveld

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
what is so offending? bad art?

SINGAPORE: The three Singaporeans who have been found guilty of contempt of court in the kangaroo T-shirt case have been sentenced to jail.

http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/392576/1/.html

Since wearing a cartoon kangaroo T-shirt is an offence inside a court, is it an offence to wear a kangaroo T-shirt outside the court - I mean in food courts, Courts stores and any hotel courtyards - or even walking down Orchard Road? I wonder.

For that matter, shouldn't we censor or ban the popular "Singapore is a fines City" T-shirt?

To be absolutely safe, wear an all-white T-shirt - lagi better with a Thunder and Lightning logo.:biggrin:
 

n01215

Alfrescian
Loyal
These guys are fighting a lost cause.....for u noe what:eek::biggrin:
obviously these guys are not very clever in what they do.
instead of entering the ring to fight, they ridiculed the referee.
how can that ever turn out to be a winner in any form?
 

Frankiestine

Alfrescian
Loyal
anyway who came up with the term of kangaroo court and why the kangaroo as the symbol to signify a inept judiciary?
 

hemunkeong

Alfrescian
Loyal
How to protest legally?

Everything seems to be illegal.
From now on anyone with a shirt/blouse with a kangaroo image
better stay far far away fro the sub and sup court. Even if the kangaroo
is that from a movie or a tourist t shirt from australia or Quantas logo :confused:
 

Leegimeremover

Alfrescian
Loyal
Can't they argue those were wallabies??

A "wallaby" court would mean nothing besides being a new design.

Can we get a cool looking wallaby or kangaroo t shirt printed and sold to Singaporeans and tourists? This may make more money than the casinos. In fact, every draconian and ridiculous stunt may warrant revenues for t-shirt sales. We can be come the comedy central hub for dictators. Let us do it. I know it will sell in Australia and the USA. Like a Michael Faye whip may ass t-shirt.
 
Top