• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Is Singapore's Economic Growth Sustainable?

SNAblog

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Mar 9, 2009
Messages
1,489
Points
0
http://seekingalpha.com/article/218109-is-singapore-s-economic-growth-sustainable

August 02, 2010

Is Singapore's Economic Growth Sustainable?

By: Joshua Hong

Flying into Singapore’s harbor is a remarkable sight. The green ocean is dotted with thousands of cargo boats in endless lines off the coast. At night, the lights from the boats reflect from the sea, creating a miniature city within the water. Singapore’s thriving harbor is one of the many signs of its rapidly growing economy.

Singapore’s Ministry of Trade and Industry announced in early July that economic growth has been much higher than its earlier estimates of 7 to 9 percent growth. According to the New York Times, Singapore is expected to be among the world’s fastest-growing economies this year, after a growth spurt in the first half of the year prompted the government to project an expansion of as much as 15 percent for 2010 – more than four times the pace at which the U.S. economy is expected to grow. While Singapore’s economic growth is impressive in comparison to America’s, many have questioned whether it is sustainable.

The Asia-Pacific region’s economic development is thriving. China and India are expected to grow by 10.5 and 9.4 percent respectively. Thailand has recently joined a number of other countries in South-East Asia in raising their main interest rates, indicating that many have begun to raise borrowing costs. Singapore lies at the heart of this growth for 2010. It is one of the region’s most open economies, serving as a major financial center and an important production and research hub for pharmaceuticals and electronics. Singapore’s GDP growth far surpassed what was originally estimated, and it represented the highest recorded increase in the country’s history. Growth in the first half was primarily driven by exports, tourism, and a booming manufacturing sector. Fredric Neumann from HSBC in Hong Kong wrote in an e-mail to Bloomberg: “We have long been bullish on Singapore’s growth outlook this year. But these numbers are running well ahead of even our estimates.”

Another main driver of Singapore’s economy is major government expenditures on infrastructure and buildings. This has lead to a cleaner and more tourist-friendly country. Within four months, the government built half of the new orange line for the country’s public transportation system. Two new casinos, owned by Genting Singapore PLC and Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS), and the first Universal Studios in South-East Asia opened in Singapore. In 2007, the country extended the transit system to Sentosa, an island off the coast of Singapore with beautiful beaches and amusement attractions. After a stressful day, Singaporeans can travel 20 minutes on the transit system and relax on Sentosa’s white-sanded beaches for free. All of this development has led to a jump in the number of tourists visiting the country. Bloomberg reported that “[the] opening of the integrated resorts and higher visitor arrival numbers has contributed to growth in the tourism-related sectors.”

Singapore is cautious of its economic growth and is keeping inflation in check by raising interest rates and allowing for currency revaluations. In the first quarter alone, Singapore’s dollar rose by 1.3% against the U.S. dollar. Brian Jackson, a senior emerging markets strategist at the Royal Bank of Canada, wrote that “[we] continue to forecast further gradual policy normalization across the Asia-Pacific region over the rest of the year, including moderate appreciation in the Singaporean dollar.”

In contrast, the U.S.’s economic growth is dwindling. Unemployment levels are high and consumer confidence is faltering. The U.S. Federal Reserve is considering whether new steps are needed to keep the U.S. economic recovery alive. A report from a meeting with officials from the Federal Reserve on July 14 indicated that the central bank needs to explore new options for bolstering the economy in light of Europe’s debt crisis, a volatile Wall Street, a stalled housing market, and high unemployment. The report indicated that the Fed policy-makers have lowered their forecasts for U.S. economic growth this year.

New claims for U.S. unemployment benefits grew more than expected, hitting levels not seen since August of 2008. The Thomson Reuters and University of Michigan preliminary index of consumer confidence decreased to 66.5, the lowest since August of the same year. The report also indicated that more than 7 out of 10 Americans believe that the economy is mired in recession and just 1 in 6 believe that they are personally better off than they were 18 months ago, when President Barack Obama took office. In comparison to America, Singapore’s economy is growing rapidly; however, is this growth sustainable?

Paul Krugman, an economics Nobel laureate, has criticized the East-Asian economic growth model by characterizing it as input-driven. It is based on increasing capital and labour, rather than growth in total factor productivity. In an article, he writes,

But it is only when one actually does the quantitative accounting that the astonishing result emerges: all of Singapore’s growth can be explained by increases in measured inputs. There is no sign at all of increased efficiency. In this sense, the growth of Lee Kuan Yew’s Singapore is an economic twin of the growth of Stalin’s Soviet Union growth achieved purely through mobilization of resources…Singapore is closer to, though still below, the efficiency of Western economies.
Krugman’s article demonstrates that while GDP numbers have drastically increased since the 1990s, Singapore’s productivity growth has remained virtually stagnant, at around 0.7% from 2000-2008. Despite this lackluster growth in labour productivity, Singapore’s manufacturing output grew at a rate of 4.3%. A major component in the growth of Singapore’s economy is the labour input. This finding is supported by the Global Wage Report 2009, which found that Singapore workers had the longest work-week among the countries surveyed, with an average work-week of 46 hours.

The main concern is that stagnant or falling productivity will eventually lead to a static economy; an example of this is Japan’s recession in 1989. To improve productivity, Singapore should invest more in education. As of now, Singapore invests roughly 2.9% of its GDP in education, a low number compared to other developed countries. The country tends to import foreign workers instead of investing in Singaporeans and nurturing talent. Consider this table on public education expenditure below:

saupload_singapre_education_thumb1.jpg


While Singapore’s recent economic growth figures are impressive, be cautious as the numbers are not as rosy as they initially appear.
 
Everyone knows its not sustainable.. That's why the FT are in Sinkapore to help with the figures
 
The country tends to import foreign workers instead of investing in Singaporeans and nurturing talent.

You are totally right about that.
 
Everyone knows its not sustainable.. That's why the FT are in Sinkapore to help with the figures

The high prices we pay in Spore is to feed all those unproductive multi-millionaire civil servants, GLC management, SAF scholars,...

Now they are addicted to ever increasing pay/bonuses even though they already make more than world class pay.

Don't forget the familees egos as wannabe big time gamblers using Temasek as an investment vehicle..

As long as these parasites are around the host will die a slow death, the signs are already there: people commiting suicide, unable to pay for their loans, in poor health due to stress & poor diet,.. It's just going to get worse & not better as long as Spore goes on business as usual. Quite simply it will be up to Sporeans to decide when they have had enough :rolleyes:
 
The garment has been importing FTrash for the past many years. It is one of ways that they know how to increase the GDP. A higher population leads to higher housing costs and land demands. This leads to higher prices for everything as people try to manage higher rents and housing costs.

The PAP is bankrupt of ideas on managing the economy.

Even when they manage to open up foreign trade it is at the expense of Singaporeans. Look at how the Philippine and Indian government talk about their own people coming here in the future for jobs. It is as though they have already been promised hundreds of thousands of jobs for their nationals when they open up their economy for Temasek and other GLCs to do business there.

This is a very sad state of affairs for Singapore. If we had instead, real entrepreneurs we wouldn't be held to ransom over macro economic deals involving the importing of hundreds of thousands of FTrash. But the bankrupt PAP has managed to hoodwink its people into thinking that this is all part of the global economy.

Well, it isn't. This is part of the PAP's maniacal way in which it governs and wants to control as many aspects of the economy as possible, especially at the expense of true entrepreneurship.

The PAP and its entire gang of comrades have to be voted out of government once and for all. As long as they stay in power, Singaporeans and Singapore will be driven into a land for the rich and the laypeople will be auctioned off to the highest bidder.

Keppel wants to work in billion dollar projects in India. India says OK but you have to let us into your economy too. PAP says OK but our land is small and we can't import that much from you. India says, you are Keppel, you are part of the government. If you can't import much from us then allow our people to come to your country to work. You must assure us that our people can get jobs in your country or the deal will not be approved.

This is the modus operandi of the foreign countries and the PAP. They sell Singaporean jobs to FTrash to enrich GLCs and Temasek. Nothing goes back to the citizens other than obscenely high housing prices, overcrowded transportation and medical services, higher prices for goods and even education is now being sold to the FTs.

The PAP has to go. The sooner the better. We cannot allow a small group of incompetent people who have highly questionable traits in terms of running an economy and a political party. They have to be voted out!
 
So what if it is not sustainable. Even if it goes kaput in 10 years,
the current powers to be can't care less because they would have
made enough to sustain themselves anywhere in the world.

You seriously think any one of these goons actually bother beyond
sustaining it as long as possible for personal benefits?
 
So what if it is not sustainable. Even if it goes kaput in 10 years,
the current powers to be can't care less because they would have
made enough to sustain themselves anywhere in the world.

You seriously think any one of these goons actually bother beyond
sustaining it as long as possible for personal benefits?

Of course the PAPies don't give a damn if we're sitting on a timebomb. All they have to do is to leave and quite a few already have their loved ones overseas as well as having vested interests in properties and businesses overseas.

But all these years, the majority of sporns have always believed believed that the PAPies wereactually doing something good for them and the cuntry.

But the last five years have been an eye opener for many sporns as they see their own loved ones losing jobs and how often the PAPies have fared poorly in major decisions and episodes.
 
So what if it is not sustainable. Even if it goes kaput in 10 years,
the current powers to be can't care less because they would have
made enough to sustain themselves anywhere in the world.

You seriously think any one of these goons actually bother beyond
sustaining it as long as possible for personal benefits?

So what if it is not sustainable. Even if it goes kaput in 10 years,
the current powers to be can't care less because they would have
made enough to sustain themselves anywhere in the world.

You seriously think any one of these goons actually bother beyond
sustaining it as long as possible for personal benefits?

Of course the PAPies don't give a damn if we're sitting on a timebomb. All they have to do is to leave and quite a few already have their loved ones overseas as well as having vested interests in properties and businesses overseas.

But all these years, the majority of sporns have always believed believed that the PAPies wereactually doing something good for them and the cuntry.

But the last five years have been an eye opener for many sporns as they see their own loved ones losing jobs and how often the PAPies have fared poorly in major decisions and episodes.
 
I see it as simply choosing quantity over quality.

They just want to produce more or charge more by increasing prices(to boost GDP) although quality drops.

The end result we see locally is that we are paying more for lower quality.Good example is the property market where people are paying more and more for smaller and smaller houses.

Inevitably there will be a flight to quality-just wait.
 
Everyone knows it's the clever manipulation of
figures to justify their own pay increase .
 
Well that article basically answers the question on why PAP seem so obsess with increasing "productivity" the last 2 year. It seem to be their Buzzword these days. Hardly a week gets by without the local media harping about increase productivity
 
Back
Top