• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Is Singapore an Illusion or Delusion?

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR>S'pore pre-Raffles no sleepy fishing village
</TR><!-- headline one : end --><!-- show image if available --></TBODY></TABLE>




<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"--><!-- more than 4 paragraphs -->I REFER to Mr Tan Yip Meng's letter on Tuesday, 'Back to the future, a sleepy fishing village'.
His claim that Singapore was a sleepy fishing village, which is taken from our history textbooks, is incorrect. Before the arrival of Stamford Raffles, Singapore was a Malay trading port in the 14th century that welcomed traders from all over Asia. Even just before Raffles' arrival, it was not merely a sleepy fishing village and had gambier plantations worked by the Chinese.
Therefore Mr Tan's claim of the 'illusion' of a trading port, among others, cannot be true because of the artifacts that were excavated in Fort Canning and other parts of Singapore. These show a vibrant trading culture, not only among people in South-east Asia but also people from China and India, before the arrival of Raffles.
Mr Tan also claims that the nation-state paradigm, when applied to Singapore, is an illusion as Singapore is an artificial nation. However, all nation-states are created artificially by man, and no nation-state, or even state, could exist if not for the decisions and actions of man to create one.
Concepts and ideas like nationalism and citizenship, which are the foundation of any nation-state in the world, were also created by man. So if Singapore is an illusion, so are other nation-states.
While it is true that Singapore, due to its physical limitations, requires itself to be unique in what it offers to other countries and major corporations, I do not believe a one-party dominant system is as unique as Mr Tan thinks it is.
Because of this, I firmly believe that, even with a two-party or multi-party system in place, Singapore will survive and even prosper as long as it remains a hub where goods, information, ideas and people flow in and out, similar to what happened here before the arrival of Raffles in 1819. Han Mingguang
 

madmansg

Alfrescian
Loyal
the govt try to suppress our historic pass as it would invalidate their legitimacy, for if the truth come out , china could rightfully claime sg as their province.
 
Top