• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Is OCBC Bullshitting?

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
After Peesai being the first cuntry to go into recession and Sporns are blithely rolling over their credit, thinking that they've an iron rice bowl? And while Ho Jinx and Daddy-in-Law lost $80B in one fell swoop?

<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR>OCBC: S'pore economy least risky

</TR><!-- headline one : end --><TR>It is best-equipped to tackle financial crisis, according to report </TR><!-- Author --><TR><TD class="padlrt8 georgia11 darkgrey bold" colSpan=2>By Robin Chan

</TD></TR><!-- show image if available --></TBODY></TABLE>




<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"--><!-- more than 4 paragraphs -->SINGAPORE has been rated the best-equipped of more than 50 economies worldwide to overcome a serious economic crisis in an OCBC report prompted by the current global financial meltdown.
Released on Wednesday, the report, which may help Singaporeans sleep easier at night, looked at risk levels and awarded Singapore full marks for its long-term economic fundamentals.
Assessed according to seven indicators of economic health, the Republic received a point in every category to top the list as the least risky of 50 economies and the Euro-zone.
The rankings placed the United States and Britain ominously low. OCBC economist Selena Ling said as both governments take on more debt for bailout packages to save financial institutions, the long-term economic health of both countries would be under severe stress.
The seven indicators fall under three broad categories that the economists believe to be the most important gauges of a country's ability to survive what they call 'severe economic adversity'.
Ms Ling said that the prospect of this occurring is highly likely, given the global credit crunch and a potential global recession.
The broad categories used to track a country's economic health are the ability of a country to cushion itself in a downturn, its level of leverage or debt, and its debt to income level.
Countries with large savings rather than debt, access to usable reserves and which run a fiscal surplus generally fared better on the list.
This report, the first of its kind released by the bank, was initiated in view of the global financial meltdown, said Ms Ling.
With countries taking on so much debt to bail out their banks, attention was now being turned to sovereign risk rather than just corporate risk.
Most notably, Iceland is on the verge of bankruptcy because it cannot fund the bailout of its troubled banks.
The traditional sovereign credit ratings may therefore not accurately reflect the stresses the economies are going under, Ms Ling said.
OCBC economists said that Singapore passed all the indicators that are deemed important in determining the medium- to long-term economic fundamentals.
Joining Singapore as being certified low-risk were Scandinavian countries Denmark, Norway and Sweden and also Switzerland.
The surprising results were that South Korea, Russia, Thailand and Venezuela were also considered low-risk, mainly due to passing the cushioning indicator with 'flying colours', OCBC's economists said in the report. This means that these economies have a relatively higher savings to gross domestic product ratio and usable reserves.
South Korea has a single A credit rating from rating agency Standard & Poor's while Russia and Thailand have a triple B plus rating, and Venezuela, a double B minus rating. The highest rating is triple A.
Iceland was unsurprisingly deemed high-risk, but developed economies like the United States, Britain and the Euro-zone also fell under this category. [email protected]
 

Summerbee

Alfrescian
Loyal
This report was done AFTER events of the credit crisis has unfolded. Naturally they are going to put US, UK and Iceland at the bottom. I am not impressed at all and instead am somewhat disgusted at such an unprofessional means of doing a study. Singapore is the first key Asian economies to go into recession (this is already a fact) and would be the only one expected to contract in 2009. This apparently is not a criteria for their dubious methodology.
 

ahbengsong

Alfrescian
Loyal
When a report can says that a small dot like singapore who depends on US and EU for its economic lifeline is better than its largest trading partners in economic risks... better to throw out that report like what normally is done with the pap straits times...
 

cass888

Alfrescian
Loyal
When a report can says that a small dot like singapore who depends on US and EU for its economic lifeline is better than its largest trading partners in economic risks... better to throw out that report like what normally is done with the pap straits times...

Very simple. It is because Singapore has been saving money unlike what the MONGREL who bit his masters' hands LOUDHAILER chee soon juan and his SDP reCHEEme would have done. So we have money in the bank to deal with the econimic crisis. And you should know, nothing beats money in the bank. If can be used to pump prime the economy.

If the reCHEEme had been in charge, there would have been no money left. And then we would be screwed.
 

halsey02

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
When a report can says that a small dot like singapore who depends on US and EU for its economic lifeline is better than its largest trading partners in economic risks... better to throw out that report like what normally is done with the pap straits times...

The bull is now shitting, taken too many 'laxatives', soon it will shit to death! That is why it is call BULLSHITTING!.

The Shit Times, is 99.9% bullshitting!, that is why it is called the SHIT times! You believe at your own peril, don't beleive me, ask those 'poor souls' who bought, HI 5! ( not the Australian Children's TV program), and those mini mes! They are most likely the avid readers of the press here!.. Hi FIVE!

no! bullshit!..anyway, the report is telling you to buy, and then they sell, and it is a GOOF BYE! ha ha ha ha:biggrin:
 
Top