From: isabeltan Apr-20 11:43 pm
To: NgEjay (9 of 13)
11837.9 in reply to 11837.6
"Do you mean to say gender equality has nothing to do with sexual equality? "
Homos aka gays and lesbians have gender equality in that there is no discrimination in jobs, education etc. That is part of the so-called "AWARE values".
This does not mean that they have to support guys and girls who practise bestiality, paedophilia and even homosexual acts, all of which are unnatural and deviant.
So what is wrong with that?
You are only trying to mislead the argument by trying to equate gender equality and sexual equality. Typical of the usual gay agenda.
If the gays want to practise their deviant acts, please do so in private but don't try to normalise their behaviour so that society finds it acceptable.
How would it be if rapists, bullies and paedophiliacs acts are 'normalised and accepted by the general public? Please state if you would like to see gays kissing each other in public, on tv, in the mrts, approaching your kids to try to join them (so that their pool/universe of sexual partners becomes wider)
Please state your case.
If AWARE is supportive of the gay agenda, please state so to. I am sure the public will be interested to know that too. Don't hide behind the wider and more nebulous 'gender equality'. Let's be more precise and accurate in our arguments so we know where eacj stands.
There is nothing wrong in full and accurate disclosure.
Let's see how the past presidents of AWARE respond to this charge. Let'e see hoe the great Constance Singham answer this question. Seriously, is she happy that her brother is gay? Why doesn't she openly celebrate the proposition? let's have some sincere and honest disclosure here.
To: NgEjay (9 of 13)
11837.9 in reply to 11837.6
"Do you mean to say gender equality has nothing to do with sexual equality? "
Homos aka gays and lesbians have gender equality in that there is no discrimination in jobs, education etc. That is part of the so-called "AWARE values".
This does not mean that they have to support guys and girls who practise bestiality, paedophilia and even homosexual acts, all of which are unnatural and deviant.
So what is wrong with that?
You are only trying to mislead the argument by trying to equate gender equality and sexual equality. Typical of the usual gay agenda.
If the gays want to practise their deviant acts, please do so in private but don't try to normalise their behaviour so that society finds it acceptable.
How would it be if rapists, bullies and paedophiliacs acts are 'normalised and accepted by the general public? Please state if you would like to see gays kissing each other in public, on tv, in the mrts, approaching your kids to try to join them (so that their pool/universe of sexual partners becomes wider)
Please state your case.
If AWARE is supportive of the gay agenda, please state so to. I am sure the public will be interested to know that too. Don't hide behind the wider and more nebulous 'gender equality'. Let's be more precise and accurate in our arguments so we know where eacj stands.
There is nothing wrong in full and accurate disclosure.
Let's see how the past presidents of AWARE respond to this charge. Let'e see hoe the great Constance Singham answer this question. Seriously, is she happy that her brother is gay? Why doesn't she openly celebrate the proposition? let's have some sincere and honest disclosure here.
