PREVALENCE AND RISK FACTORS OF H. PYLORIINFECTION
In general, the prevalence of
H. pyloriinfection is more than 90% in peptic ulcer patients who are not using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
15 and 20% to 40% among patients with functional dyspepsia according to various diagnostic methods.
16 In six studies of dyspeptic patients in Indonesia, the prevalence of
H. pylori infection varied from 5.7% to 68%.
17-
19 The highest prevalence was found in Jakarta using the rapid urease test, culture and histology.
20 The results of the urea breath test varied but usually found a low prevalence of
H. pylori infection, from 0% to 11.2%.
18,
19,
21 We found several reasons for these inconsistent results, including the accuracy of each
H. pylori test, differences between location of the biopsy, differences between pathologists and variation in the evaluation criteria.
22 Furthermore, most of these studies were conducted in the region where Javanese was the predominant ethnicity.
To clarify the reasons for these inconsistent results, our study in Surabaya, Java Island applied five different methods to detect
H. pylori infection: culture, histology, immunohistochemistry, rapid urease test and urine antibody test and found that the prevalence of
H. pylori infection was low (11.5%) based on at least one positive result among those five tests.
22 We then expanded the study to include
849 patients from the five largest islands representing at least 13 ethnic groups. The prevalence was still considerably low with only 10.4% (Table 1).23,24 In contrast with neighboring countries such as Thailand and the Philippines, with prevalence rates of 76.1% and 60%, respectively,25,
26 we found a low prevalence of 22.1%.
27 Another survey in North Sulawesi province using urine tests in 251 adult patients of predominantly Minahasanese and Mongondownese ethnicity detected
H. pylori in only 14.3% of subjects. A prevalence of
H. pylori infection of only 3.8% was reported in a population of children in North Sulawesi, Indonesia.
28