- Joined
- Jul 18, 2008
- Messages
- 661
- Points
- 18
It really makes no sense if cutting PRs' healthcare subsidy can win PAP more votes.
Why do PAP people cut the PRs healthcare subsidy instead of increasing subsidy for the local -people healthcare?
On the other side the coin, will PRs upgrade to new citizens to vote for PAP?
By cutting PRs subsidy, it only will save PAP Govt some money and not actually helping the local people.
Local people do not just want to see PAP widens the subsidy gap to make them happy.
Ultimately, Locals must see tangible benefits coming to them and not enjoying PAP's feat putting on a show to mistreat PRs.
PAP tactic on healthcare subsidy is plain nonsense . So hardup of winning votes.
Why do PAP people cut the PRs healthcare subsidy instead of increasing subsidy for the local -people healthcare?
On the other side the coin, will PRs upgrade to new citizens to vote for PAP?
By cutting PRs subsidy, it only will save PAP Govt some money and not actually helping the local people.
Local people do not just want to see PAP widens the subsidy gap to make them happy.
Ultimately, Locals must see tangible benefits coming to them and not enjoying PAP's feat putting on a show to mistreat PRs.
PAP tactic on healthcare subsidy is plain nonsense . So hardup of winning votes.