If Charles Chong is misquoted as what he claims, then he should...

[R4g3]

If Charles Chong is misquoted as what he claims, then he should held the media responsible for it.

http://wayangparty.com/2009/01/21/breaking-charles-chong-reply-to-wayangparty/

if not everyone can just push away the responsibility for any mistake they have created.

Prove to us that you are innocent, not just empty talks.

 

[meepok kia]

There are seven sins in the world:
1) wealth without work,
2) pleasure without conscience,
3) knowledge without character,
4) commerce without morality,
5) science without humanity,
6) worship without sacrifice and
7) politics without principle.

 

[snrcitizen]

If Charles Chong is misquoted as what he claims, then he should held the media responsible for it.

If he claims he was misquoted it is his prerogative and duty to take issue with the press. If we do not read of a retraction from the press it will be mean that his current denial is just another blatant lie from a PAP coward.

Twisting his own words from "they" to "us" lesser mortals is such a feeble and disgusting attempt to cover his own arse. What calibre is this so-called PAP talent that they boast so much about? Just because they are stupid does not mean that the rest of us are just as, or more stupid.

 

[Patriot]

If Charles Chong is misquoted as what he claims, then he should held the media responsible for it.

http://wayangparty.com/2009/01/21/breaking-charles-chong-reply-to-wayangparty/

if not everyone can just push away the responsibility for any mistake they have created.

Prove to us that you are innocent, not just empty talks.

In his reply, Charles Chong is trying to create the impression that he is one of the "lesser mortals" by inserting the word, "us" i.e. identifying with the common people and therefore, is not one of the "elites".

In the article, he was quoted as :“Maybe it made lesser mortals envious and they thought maybe he was a little bit boastful,” he said. “Would people have taken offence if his wife (a senior investment counsellor at a bank) had paid for everything?”

Would he have used, "they" and "people" in the above quotes if he considers himself to be one of the "lesser mortals" as he asserts by inserting the word, "us" in front of "lesser mortals" in his reply? It fails to stand up to the test in the context.