- Joined
- Mar 11, 2013
- Messages
- 14,175
- Points
- 113
The Islamic Emirate however said in Wednesday’s statement that Afghanistan implements court rulings in accordance with a thorough judicial process and meticulous legal scrutiny.
The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan on Wednesday warned the UN in Afghanistan (UNAMA) against criticizing or undermining the ordinances of Islamic Shariah and said remarks by the organization last week on the execution of four men were “unacceptable”.
In a statement issued by the IEA’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Islamic Emirate said the remarks were in “direct contravention of the organization’s mandate, and is categorically unacceptable.”
The ministry stated that as an Islamic government it was their duty to carry out such punishments under Sharia.
On Friday, UNAMA condemned the executions and called for the abolishment of the death penalty in Afghanistan.
In a post on X UNAMA stated: “The death penalty is inconsistent with the fundamental right to life. UNAMA calls for an immediate moratorium on the death penalty as a step towards its abolition.”
Four men were publicly executed in Afghanistan last week: two in Badghis, one in Nimroz, and one in Farah province.
The Islamic Emirate however said in Wednesday’s statement that Afghanistan implements court rulings in accordance with a thorough judicial process and meticulous legal scrutiny.
“During this process, the accused is granted full rights to defense from the beginning until a final verdict is issued,” the statement read.
The IEA said UNAMA’s remarks that Qisas punishments were “contrary to the right to life” and that the death penalty should be abolished “are considered irresponsible and based on ignorance of Islamic rulings.”
“The implementation of Shariah-prescribed punishments, including Qisas, is an undeniable component of Islamic law.
“In the sacred texts, Qisas is explicitly associated with the preservation of life, and human experience has also demonstrated its effectiveness in ensuring justice and social order.
“As an Islamic government, the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan considers the implementation of Qisas its religious obligation,” the statement read.
As such, the IEA reminded UNAMA that “any attempt to critique or undermine the ordinances of Islamic Shariah constitutes an overreach, is in direct contravention of the organization’s mandate, and is categorically unacceptable.
“Moving forward, it is imperative that UNAMA refrain from engaging in such remarks,” the IEA warned.
Qisas, in Islamic legal terms, translates to “retaliation in kind,” “an eye for an eye,” or retributive justice.
It’s a principle of Islamic law that allows for punishment in kind or compensation.
The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan on Wednesday warned the UN in Afghanistan (UNAMA) against criticizing or undermining the ordinances of Islamic Shariah and said remarks by the organization last week on the execution of four men were “unacceptable”.
In a statement issued by the IEA’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Islamic Emirate said the remarks were in “direct contravention of the organization’s mandate, and is categorically unacceptable.”
The ministry stated that as an Islamic government it was their duty to carry out such punishments under Sharia.
On Friday, UNAMA condemned the executions and called for the abolishment of the death penalty in Afghanistan.
In a post on X UNAMA stated: “The death penalty is inconsistent with the fundamental right to life. UNAMA calls for an immediate moratorium on the death penalty as a step towards its abolition.”
Four men were publicly executed in Afghanistan last week: two in Badghis, one in Nimroz, and one in Farah province.
The Islamic Emirate however said in Wednesday’s statement that Afghanistan implements court rulings in accordance with a thorough judicial process and meticulous legal scrutiny.
“During this process, the accused is granted full rights to defense from the beginning until a final verdict is issued,” the statement read.
The IEA said UNAMA’s remarks that Qisas punishments were “contrary to the right to life” and that the death penalty should be abolished “are considered irresponsible and based on ignorance of Islamic rulings.”
“The implementation of Shariah-prescribed punishments, including Qisas, is an undeniable component of Islamic law.
“In the sacred texts, Qisas is explicitly associated with the preservation of life, and human experience has also demonstrated its effectiveness in ensuring justice and social order.
“As an Islamic government, the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan considers the implementation of Qisas its religious obligation,” the statement read.
As such, the IEA reminded UNAMA that “any attempt to critique or undermine the ordinances of Islamic Shariah constitutes an overreach, is in direct contravention of the organization’s mandate, and is categorically unacceptable.
“Moving forward, it is imperative that UNAMA refrain from engaging in such remarks,” the IEA warned.
Qisas, in Islamic legal terms, translates to “retaliation in kind,” “an eye for an eye,” or retributive justice.
It’s a principle of Islamic law that allows for punishment in kind or compensation.
