• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chitchat Ideal not to ferry workers on lorries but more regulation would hurt industry, livelihoods: Amy Khor

bobby

Alfrescian
Loyal
The recent deaths of two migrant workers who were riding at the back of lorries have sparked fresh calls to have the practice banned.


SINGAPORE — Further regulation to make it safer to transport workers on lorries would likely affect the completion of various building projects, spell the demise of some companies and cause the loss of workers’ livelihoods, Dr Amy Khor said in Parliament on Monday (May 10).

Despite this, the Senior Minister of State for the Ministry of Transport (MOT) gave assurances that the Government will continue to refine its policies and regulations, and engage stakeholders to further improve safety rules.

“From a road safety perspective, it would be ideal for lorries not to carry any passengers in their rear decks,” she said.

“But there are very significant practical and operational issues — on top of just cost considerations — which is probably why internationally, it is (a common) practice.”

Dr Khor was responding to questions fielded in Parliament over recent accidents involving migrant workers on the back of lorries, which resulted in numerous injuries and two deaths.

Member of Parliament (MP) Alex Yam for Marsiling-Yew Tee Group Representation Constituency (GRC) asked if MOT would consider transporting workers in mini-buses or buses with compulsory seat-belting, while MP Dennis Tan for Hougang constituency asked if there were any plans to review the carriage of workers at the backs of lorries or goods vehicles.

Dr Khor outlined steps taken a decade ago to improve safety, such as the installation of higher protective side railings and canopy covers, as well as having tougher penalties for non-compliance.

She said that compared to 10 years ago, further regulatory changes now would cause more “acute pain” to the industry, given the fallout from the Covid-19 pandemic with severe manpower shortages, delayed projects, and productivity being affected because of safety regulations

“Further regulations will likely have impact on the completion of various building projects, from (Built-to-Order Housing and Development Board projects) to MRTs to nursing homes and hospitals, (and it will) spell the demise of some companies and the loss of workers’ livelihoods.”

However, she added that “one fatality is still one too many” and that the Government will continue to conduct public education so that the lorry owners and drivers are reminded of the rules.

It will also continue to refine its policies and regulations, and will “continue to review the safety rules, engaging the various stakeholders along the way, to see how to enhance these measures further”.

Dr Khor said that as far back as 2008, a workgroup co-chaired by the Ministry of Manpower and the Land Transport Authority (LTA) had conducted a review on the safety of such workers, leading to the enhanced safety measures for lorries ferrying passengers.

Data from LTA showed that the average number of persons injured on board lorries for every 1,000 lorries from 2011 to 2020 is about 8.7, comparable to about 8.6 for every 1,000 vehicles for the total motor vehicle population during the same period.

The death rate for people on board lorries was nine a year on average from 2011 to 2015, and this dropped to 2.6 on average a year from 2016 to 2020.

However, the total number of deaths involving lorry accidents has been increasing since 2018.

Ms He Ting Ru, MP for Sengkang GRC, then asked Dr Khor if there will be studies done on how much costs will be increased if more safety measures are implemented.

“We need to understand how much costs will be increased, before we can have a meaningful conversation about whether or not there needs to be further safety measures put in place,” Ms He said.

In response, Dr Khor said that the issue goes “beyond costs”.

“At the ground, there are significant real, practical, and operational challenges on top of this cost consideration.”

However, she added that to estimate the extra costs in prohibiting the transportation of workers on lorries and goods vehicles, then a detailed study and consultation with the industry will have to be undertaken.

“So it is something that we can consider as part of the review.”
 

bobby

Alfrescian
Loyal
What are the related penalties for not wearing a seat belt?

A fine of $120 will be imposed on adult passengers who fail to wear a seat belt.

If charged in court and convicted, the penalty shall be a fine not exceeding S$1,000 or imprisonment for a term not exceeding 3 months.
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Wearing a seatbelt is not necessary... they just need to adopt the method NS slaves use when sitting inside a tonner truck.
 

bobby

Alfrescian
Loyal
Ideal not to ferry workers on lorries import Ah Nehs but more regulation would hurt industry, livelihoods: Amy Khor
 

sweetiepie

Alfrescian
Loyal
The death rate for people on board lorries was nine a year on average from 2011 to 2015, and this dropped to 2.6 on average a year from 2016 to 2020.

However, the total number of deaths involving lorry accidents has been increasing since 2018.
My uncle say KNN smelly ter khor never use brain to think the root cause of all these is the issuance of driving license like tampons KNN
 

Hypocrite-The

Alfrescian
Loyal
I dont understand wat is the issue with ferrying workers using lorries when national slavery slaves r transported via 3 tonners all the time. If Amy HardKaur served NS. She would have known about tat. From the photo. Wats the difference between the lorry n 3 tonner? Was it any less safe than when we were in NS?
 

batman1

Alfrescian
Loyal
I dont understand wat is the issue with ferrying workers using lorries when national slavery slaves r transported via 3 tonners all the time. If Amy HardKaur served NS. She would have known about tat. From the photo. Wats the difference between the lorry n 3 tonner? Was it any less safe than when we were in NS?
WHY is she even discussing about worker safety ? Her only expertise is cutting ribbon for opening ceremony of temporary bus stops .
 

Hypocrite-The

Alfrescian
Loyal
Great opportunity to score points for xenophilic virtue signalling, perhaps also on the diplomatic front with Bangladesh and relevant countries.
These countries are worth nothing on the diplomatic front ..like mudland..they need singkieland more...so only under such incompetent leadership does it work backwards
 

Scrooball (clone)

Alfrescian
Loyal
These politicians have never spent a single day working the actual ground and solving real world issues. Easy for them to ban this and that, but applicable in real life or not?
 

syed putra

Alfrescian
Loyal
WHY is she even discussing about worker safety ? Her only expertise is cutting ribbon for opening ceremony of temporary bus stops .
Every self respecting companies have a " heslth, safety, security, environment " policy they must adhere to. Every accident cost delay and financial losses. The idea is to minimise the impact by prevention.
A bus would be a better transport for workers than lorries. And shelter them from the weather.
 
Top