• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chitchat Huh? How does a person botak or not affect his judgement?

tomychua

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Oct 19, 2015
Messages
309
Points
0
Article Source: https://goo.gl/TrSbnu

13501891_1019328548104449_9123978296954889239_n.jpg

Don’t understand TI-SG’s and its readers’ logic. How does the amount of hair on DPM Tharman’s scalp affected his judgement? Just because one TI - SG’s reader does not agree, DPM Tharman must be wrong in his judgements?

Seriously, there are thousands of youths in Singapore and we have definitely met youths that match what DPM Tharman described.

We also believe that what DPM Tharman has said, other elders must have shared before.

To read from the original site, visit: https://goo.gl/TrSbnu
 
Of course it does not , but if LHL is botak then ckmpd will say it does.
 
... Don’t understand TI-SG’s and its readers’ logic. How does the amount of hair on DPM Tharman’s scalp affected his judgement? Just because one TI - SG’s reader does not agree, DPM Tharman must be wrong in his judgements? ...
ah middaydog wil agree wif u ... but 2 bad, he wun log in 2 support u ...
 
Botak people are intelligent people. Because they used their head so much that it overheats and made their hairs drop off.
 
ah middaydog wil agree wif u ... but 2 bad, he wun log in 2 support u ...

ah middaydog is not botak. Nobody who is botak will claim that he is botak. :D
 
Article Source: https://goo.gl/TrSbnu

13501891_1019328548104449_9123978296954889239_n.jpg

Don’t understand TI-SG’s and its readers’ logic. How does the amount of hair on DPM Tharman’s scalp affected his judgement? Just because one TI - SG’s reader does not agree, DPM Tharman must be wrong in his judgements?

Seriously, there are thousands of youths in Singapore and we have definitely met youths that match what DPM Tharman described.

We also believe that what DPM Tharman has said, other elders must have shared before.

To read from the original site, visit: https://goo.gl/TrSbnu

Don't know if it affects judgement, but it is a fact that being botak means not likely to become country's leader.

From the top of my head...

UK
david cameron->gordon brown->tony blair->john major->harold wilson

USA
obama->bush jr->clinton->bush sr->reagan->jimmy carter->nixon->lb johnson->kennedy

Singapore
LHL->GCT->LKY

Malaysia
najib->badawi->mahathir


China
Xi jinping->hu jintao->jiang zemin->deng xiaoping->mao zedong


Of course the hair may not be natural, and there are exceptions like john howard of australia, but modern history has shown that the odds are stacked against botaks becoming country leaders.
 
Don't know if it affects judgement, but it is a fact that being botak means not likely to become country's leader
.

Botak Ong was a leader. He managed to misled one follower to suck his langjeow which was described as personal dickretion.
 
Back
Top