• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Housing Complex in China: Only Westerners allowed !

GoFlyKiteNow

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
2,605
Points
0
Housing Complex in China Open Only to Westerners

" The ban on Chinese tenants was necessary to maintain the “purity” said one official.

Beijing.

A property developer in China is inviting only “Western-looking” foreigners to live in a new development, sparking comparisons with the controversial concession areas in the 1800s, state media said on Friday.

Ethnic Chinese, even foreign passport holders, will not be welcome to rent apartments in the Tianfu International Community in the city of Chengdu, the Global Times reported.

The ban on Chinese tenants was necessary to maintain the “purity” of the international community, an employee surnamed Wang in the marketing department of the Chengdu Hi-Tech Investment Group was quoted as saying.

Chengdu Hi-Tech Investment is the parent of Chengdu Hi-Tech Properties, one of the developers involved in the project.

“The foreigners we are talking about are those Western-looking people. We want to ensure that the international community is pure,” Wang said. “Others may be welcomed later.”

The first phase of the development will be finished in October. Once completed, it will be able to accommodate 5,000 people and will have a church, schools, hospital and playgrounds, the paper said.

The development has been criticized by Chinese residents in Chengdu and Internet users. They say it is racist and reminiscent of the foreign concession territories created in several Chinese cities after it lost the Opium Wars in the mid-1800s.

“I think they are practicing racial segregation by keeping out Chinese,” Gao Song was quoted by the Global Times as saying.
 
Great publicity stunt! Now everyone in China would know about this particular development. No easy to stand out in a market where there are ltos of developments and with financing drying up.

I think this way because what they are doing is probably illegal - especially in China where equal rights for women is progressive.

Lets keep our eyes on this project and see the outcome.

One curious point - they quoted a Mr Wang from marketing - poor journalism at best. They must put the full name of the company spokeman. It is like saying I spoke to Mr Tan of marketing (wah how many Mr Tans are there?). This is esp so since most of the article is based on Mr Wang's comments.
 
There was a somewhat similar issue recently in India over similar matter (BTW, great publicity stunt with a viral twist - overnight whole of India heard about the ice cream - and of course given India's past during colonial times - "no Indians or Dogs allowed" this would be strictly illegal!):

http://blogs.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/randomaccess/entry/sorry-indians-not-allowed1

My friend Ramit (name changed on request) called me late Friday night. He sounded quite agitated. “You know, Haagen Dazs has opened its Delhi outlet”. I reacted with a joke. “Good, now you can spend a lot more on an ice cream than you normally would. But why are you agitated?”

“Because I am not allowed to enter”, he said. Now, Ramit is not like one of the politician’s son or into drugs, the sort who are often in news in India’s capital for all the wrong reasons, nor is he the kind who will shoot someone down because she refused to serve him a cone of ice cream.

He did not waste much time and said he has taken a picture and is mailing me the reason. I switched on my mail, and clicked on the attachment. I couldn’t believe what I saw. Was I in India, 62 years after gaining independence, and years after South Africa officially ended apartheid?

The banners outside the outlet said: Exclusive Preview for International Travellers. And under that, in an even finer print, the real bombshell: Access restricted only to holders of international passports.



I immediately called Ramit. “You are an international traveler, and you have a passport, so you can go in”, I said. Ramit’s response was instant: I tried to enter but they said you are not allowed for you don’t have an international passport.

I am normally not given to immediate emotional reactions, but I couldn’t resist this time. I was, to be honest, upset. How can they do this to an Indian, in India? Do a story on TOI or NBT? Do it for print or Online? Call other media friends and colleagues? I simply didn’t know how to react. Print would have a better impact, but should I wait that long?

Then I felt, why not use the power of the social media? Next thing I knew was that I had put up a few pictures on facebook, added a caption and also sent out a tweet with a request it be retweeted. In a few hours, it had turned into a viral and I started getting messages from angry Indians all over. Why just Indians, even friends in international media wrote to say “this is the stupidest thing they have seen in a long time”.

I didn’t stop at that. I ended up calling a few MPs I knew I could speak to bluntly and told them about it, taunting them about it.

I don’t know what finally worked, but it seems word did get around to the outlet’s franchisee and they started claiming there never was any restriction on anybody entering the outlet.

While this may be considered a victory for people power, I am still unable to figure out who in his right senses would have advised the dessert company to do something so stupid. Was it a way to generate controversy for free publicity? Did they think it will work subliminally on Indians mind that now that it has been ‘certified’ by international travelers it would be good for them too?

Whatever it is, it is idiotic. I checked later and found that the franchisee is an Indian company based in Delhi and the man incharge is also an Indian.

I have often maintained that we ourselves are our biggest enemies. Our mentality is that of slaves and we think anything is good only if its approved by foreigners, or the “holders of international passport”.

Perhaps the Indian franchisee had this in mind. And a comment on the picture I put up on the facebook by an Indian who migrated to Australia decades ago sums it up: Most international travellers don't want HD in India when they can get it in their own backyard. Its a commodity not a special thing for them. They would also see this as pure cashing in and thinking they are idiots - 'India taking them for a ride.' Have to remember not every international traveler is American; makes an average salary of squillion dollars; can often be allergic to dairy (yes); is in India to have an 'authentic Indian' experience and by golly even enjoy kulfi, falooda, lassi, dosa! This is all about how India and Indians see themselves. Foreigners have nothing to do with it.

UPDATED: December 17, 2009

Dear readers,

A Director of Haagen Dazs, Arindam Haldar, called me Wednesday evening and wanted to discuss this post and the reaction it has generated from Indians all over the world. He tried to explain that their banner that has resulted in such heat was merely a teaser and that the company can never say no to an Indian. He admitted that the company may have erred in its choice of words and he was sorry. When I said I merely did the job of a journalist and that the apology should actually be addressed to Indians all over the world, and even non-Indians, who have expressed disgust at your company’s insensitivity, he said he’d send out an apology to the media. While he sounded apologetic on the phone and said he was genuinely sorry, I present below the 'apology' the Managing Director of the company that manages the brand in India sent out. You can decide for yourself if this really constitutes an apology.

Media Statement from: Mr. Anindo Mukherji, Managing Director, General Mills India

There have been some reports alleging that the recently opened Häagen-Dazs shop denied access to Indians. We vehemently and categorically deny this. Häagen-Dazs products and our Häagen-Dazs shop in India are and will always be for our consumers in India.

The recently opened Haagen-Dazs shop is open to one and all, and there’s no question of barring entry to anyone on any basis. The pre view on Thursday, 10th December had a morning media event which was attended by journalists of repute from Indian media. The same evening we had a launch party for our friends and families, less than 5% of who were foreigners. Also, during the mock training days at the shop leading up to 10th December, a lot of interests were generated and hundreds of walk-ins were given samples of our ice cream.

The poster in question was part of initial local store communication at a few locations within the same mall announcing the opening of the new Häagen-Dazs shop in the mall. The message was intended to suggest that you can enjoy, for instance, a taste of the French Riviera without traveling to France – by enjoying Häagen-Dazs. Unfortunately the reference to the international passport holder on the poster may have led to a significant miscommunication. This was completely unintended and we apologize for creating the misimpression that may have hurt our sentiments as Indians.
 
Are dogs allowed?

since many angmo keep dogs as household pets, dogs are allowed in the housing complex. for chinese to be admitted into the complex, they must either be pets or prostitutes... the former to give wives and mistresses companionship and the latter for easing groinal tensions of angmo men.
 
pretty funny - good one!


since many angmo keep dogs as household pets, dogs are allowed in the housing complex. for chinese to be admitted into the complex, they must either be pets or prostitutes... the former to give wives and mistresses companionship and the latter for easing groinal tensions of angmo men.
 
Great publicity stunt! Now everyone in China would know about this particular development. No easy to stand out in a market where there are ltos of developments and with financing drying up.

I think this way because what they are doing is probably illegal - especially in China where equal rights for women is progressive.

Lets keep our eyes on this project and see the outcome.

One curious point - they quoted a Mr Wang from marketing - poor journalism at best. They must put the full name of the company spokeman. It is like saying I spoke to Mr Tan of marketing (wah how many Mr Tans are there?). This is esp so since most of the article is based on Mr Wang's comments.

The garment must shut down this disgusting company. It is a big insult. How can they do this, in their own country.
 
Another thing was this hit the press over the weekend - perfect timing. SO of course no official response. Just enough time for news to go viral and get everyone to talk about it. Come Monday, we should hear - no lah project targeted at foreigners but locals can buy too.
 
Back
Top