• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Ho Jinx Made Lotsa $ From Forcing Sporns Watch Unwanted TV?

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
And profit is used to offset against her overseas punting losses?

<TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%"><TBODY><TR>Stop this unfriendly bundling of TV channels
</TR><!-- headline one : end --><!-- show image if available --></TBODY></TABLE>




<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"--><!-- more than 4 paragraphs -->I REFER to Mr Lawrence Chia's letter last Saturday, 'IDA should check stiff billing by telcos'. I agree and wish to add a couple more pointers.
Before cable TV arrived, we could record one channel on a video cassette recorder while watching another channel. Now we cannot do that unless we have a recorder from StarHub, which can be bought or rented at a high price. That is not really a choice.
Programmes are repeated on channels such as Hallmark, to cater for a regional audience, yet we cannot choose specific channels we want. Rather, channels are packaged as a bundle and I have channels I do not want. That is not a choice either, is it?
Our hands are tied and every time excuses are given that foreign networks determine the conditions. Doesn't StarHub have a voice?
It is time that the Infocomm Development Authority looked into it.
Victor Gomez
 
Top