https://news.sina.com.cn/c/2020-07-02/doc-iircuyvk1590461.shtml
“港独”逃海外也躲不过 香港国安法深度解读来了
2020年07月02日 13:36 海外网
1,296
原标题：“港独”逃海外也躲不过 香港国安法深度解读来了
7月1日，湾仔金紫荆广场举行升旗仪式（新华社）
海外网7月2日电 《中华人民共和国香港特别行政区维护国家安全法》（香港国安法）6月30日晚正式刊宪生效。多位法律界、学界专家在接受海外网采访时表示，这部法律既坚守“一国”原则，也充分尊重了“两制”。对海内外“港独”组织、外部势力都有针对性的打击。法律的实施是香港回归以来的重大节点，定能拨乱反正，让香港再出发。
特殊安排：香港国安法设立协调机制
香港国安法全文于6月30日晚正式公布，这部法律分为六章，共66条。香港与内地多名法律和学界专家对海外网表示，相关规定不但坚守“一国”原则，强调了国家安全属于中央事权，同时也充分尊重了“两制”。
全国港澳研究会理事、北京航空航天大学副教授田飞龙表示，香港国安法设立了一种“一国两制”下的特殊安排——中央驻港国家安全公署与香港维护国家安全委员会建立协调机制。立法将大部分案件的管辖权授权给香港特区执法机关，仍然适用香港的检控程序，照顾了香港社会的习惯。不过需要强调的是，中央保留了三类特别情形的管辖权，针对的是“大案要案”，以及香港社会无法自己侦破及管辖的案件。
“立法充分考虑了香港的具体情况，既体现国家意志，又兼顾到两地差异”，香港法学交流基金会副主席、法学教授傅健慈表示，立法结合了成文法和普通法的优点，最大程度地信任了香港特区。同时在基本法框架下保障市民的人权自由，平衡社会的期望。
立法过程中，全国人大常委会收集了大量香港市民的意见，包括港区全国人大代表、全国政协委员、香港社团领袖和各界代表人士等。粤港澳大湾区青年总会副主席陈志豪提到，6月28日的人大常委会会议中有一个特殊安排，除港区全国人大常委之外，还有十名港区全国人大代表列席，这充分反映了中央对香港的重视，是坚持“一国两制”的体现。
法网恢恢：“港独”分子别妄想“打擦边球”
在香港国安法通过前夕，乱港分子们生动地诠释了什么叫“闻风丧胆”。黄之锋、罗冠聪及周庭6月30日宣布退出“香港众志”，“香港民族阵线”等“港独”组织解散香港本部，一些“黄店”也退出“黄色经济圈”。
他们为什么怕成这样？陈志豪认为，香港国安法主要打击“四个罪名”，包括分裂国家罪、颠覆国家政权罪、恐怖活动罪、勾结外国或者境外势力危害国家安全罪。而“香港众志”等组织，过去一直在鼓吹分裂国家的极端政治主张，积极勾结外国势力，甚至要求外国政府制裁香港，很可能触犯了香港国安法，因此纷纷“切割”，意图摆脱过去行为的法律责任，而这充分反映了香港国安法的震慑力。
“这并不代表这些人幡然悔悟了”，田飞龙进一步指出，他们只是选择了两条路线：第一条是“对抗个人化”，即脱离组织后以个人形式对抗，寻求行动更隐蔽；另外一种是“对抗国际化”，比如“香港民族阵线”保留了海外分部，海外的“港独”组织会更加无底线地从事危害国家安全的行为。这种情况下，要警惕乱港分子在法律的周围“打擦边球”。
不过，这些逃到海外的“港独”分子和组织就能逃脱法网了吗？田飞龙指出，香港国安法规定，香港永久性居民或者在香港成立的公司、团体等组织，即便是在香港以外实施相关犯罪，也适用本法。他认为，若“港独”分子和组织在海外违反该法，可以通过国际刑警组织进行全球通缉，解散香港本部的行为在法律上并不能豁免任何罪行。而针对“港独”分子及组织过去在香港的所作所为，在两种情况下可以追究：一是有关行为和活动跨越新法生效前后的，可以由新法进行统一管辖；二是有关行为及活动在已有的侦查过程中出现新证据，且具有较大危害性的，也可以进行追溯性的审查。
香港警方1日称，如果在集会、游行中举“港独”旗、叫嚣“香港独立”等口号，甚至煽动“台独”、“藏独”、“疆独”等，皆属违法。对此，田飞龙表示，言论自由和政治表达必须是在合法的范围内，以前一些人享有“过度的政治自由”，现在必须按新法来裁量，新法把“尺子”竖在这里了。
他还指出，该法有一些条款特别针对了外部势力。不具有香港永久性居民身份的人，即便不是在香港实施犯罪，但犯罪结果反映在香港的，或与香港特区有连接点的，也受香港国安法的管辖。
拨云见日：香港回归以来的重大节点
香港国安法通过后，香港特区也迎来了一个特殊的日子。7月1日，是香港回归23周年纪念日。在维多利亚港、在金紫荆广场……一系列庆祝香港回归、庆贺香港国安法立法的活动在全港拉开。
“香港国安法的通过，是‘一国两制’在香港实践具有里程碑意义的事件，是香港回归以来的重大节点。”上海国际问题研究院港澳研究室主任张建指出，这是中央在香港维护国家主权、安全、发展利益，维护香港繁荣稳定的重大举措。香港国安法落地实施后，对香港存在的危害国家安全的活动将起到有效的遏制，也将打压以香港为基地对内地进行渗透、破坏的活动，外部势力介入香港事务的抓手和代理人将被大幅削弱。有利于保护国际投资者的合法利益、保护香港民众的生命财产安全。香港在安全法的护航下，必然会有大改变。
为了这一天，中央在立法过程中做了大量付出。人大常委会一个月内连开两次会，且两次会议相隔不足十天。傅健慈表示，这正是体现出立法的必要性、迫切性、针对性、震慑性。“只是针对极少数危害国家安全行为的人，保障了大多数守法的人”，有助于让“一国两制”行稳致远，市民安居乐业。
而香港市民也普遍理解立法的迫切性。陈志豪称，在中央宣布立法决定后，香港社会各界在网上及社区发起了“撑国安法签名行动”，在短时间内便收集到接近300万位市民的签名，充分反映了香港市民理解相关立法的必要性及迫切性。
“时间紧任务重，但是符合我国宪法及《立法法》规定的所有程序要求。”田飞龙指出，这部法律立法时间虽相对较快，但在立法的科学性、民主性和严谨性方面，都可以说是一部高质量立法。他同时强调，香港国安法是新事物，为了确保执行“不走样”，相关执法机构还须积累相互信任及办案经验，形成合力，打造“无漏洞、无死角”的全覆盖体系。
傅健慈则对立法通过感到很兴奋，身为香港市民的他说，欢迎、拥护立法和实施，香港国安法是香港的“定海神针”，定能拨乱反正，让香港再出发。（海外网 杨佳 朱惠悦 吴倩）
点击进入专题：
聚焦香港局势
"Hong Kong Independence" can't escape from the overseas, so can the in-depth interpretation of Hong Kong's national security law
Overseas network at 13:36, July 02, 2020
1,296
The original title: "Hong Kong Independence" can't escape from the overseas, so can the in-depth interpretation of Hong Kong's national security law
A flag raising ceremony was held at Golden Bauhinia Square in Wanchai on July 1 (Xinhua News Agency)
Haiwai.com, July 2 - the law of the people's Republic of China on the maintenance of national security of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (Hong Kong National Security Law) officially came into force on the evening of June 30. A number of experts from the legal and academic circles said in an interview with aowai.com that the law adheres to the principle of "one country" and fully respects the "two systems". It has targeted attacks on "Hong Kong Independence" organizations at home and abroad and external forces. The implementation of the law has been a major milestone since Hong Kong's return to the motherland. It will set things right and let Hong Kong set out again.
Special arrangement: establishment of coordination mechanism in Hong Kong's national security law
The full text of Hong Kong's national security law was officially announced on the evening of June 30. The law is divided into six chapters and 66 articles. A number of legal and academic experts from Hong Kong and the mainland told the website that the relevant provisions not only adhere to the "one country" principle, but also fully respect the "two systems".
Tian Feilong, director of the National Association for Hong Kong and Macao Studies and associate professor of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, said that Hong Kong's national security law established a special arrangement under "one country, two systems" - the establishment of a coordination mechanism between the central office for national security in Hong Kong and the Hong Kong Committee for the maintenance of national security. The legislation empowers the law enforcement agencies of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region with jurisdiction over most cases. The prosecution procedures in Hong Kong are still applicable and the customs of Hong Kong society are taken into account. However, it needs to be emphasized that the central government has reserved jurisdiction over three special cases, which are "major cases" and cases in which Hong Kong society is unable to detect and administer by itself.
"The legislation fully takes into account the specific situation of Hong Kong, reflecting the will of the state and taking into account the differences between the two places," said Fu Jianci, vice chairman of the Hong Kong law Exchange Foundation and a law professor. The legislation combines the advantages of written law and common law, and trusts the Hong Kong SAR to the greatest extent. At the same time, human rights and freedom of citizens should be guaranteed under the framework of the basic law, and social expectations should be balanced.
In the process of legislation, the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress (NPC) has collected a large number of opinions from Hong Kong citizens, including deputies to the National People's Congress (NPC), members of the National Committee of the Chinese people's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC), community leaders in Hong Kong and representatives from all walks of life. Chen Zhihao, vice chairman of Guangdong Hong Kong Macao big Bay Youth Association, mentioned that there was a special arrangement in the meeting of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress on June 28. In addition to the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress of Hong Kong, there were also 10 deputies to the National People's Congress of Hong Kong, which fully reflected the central government's attention to Hong Kong and reflected the adherence to "one country, two systems".
The restoration of French Open: "Hong Kong Independence" elements do not want to "play edge ball"
On the eve of the enactment of the national security law of Hong Kong, Hong Kong rioters vividly explained what it means to be "scared by the wind". On June 30, Huang Zhifeng, Luo Guancong and Zhou Ting announced their withdrawal from the "Hong Kong consensus", "Hong Kong National Front" and other "Hong Kong Independence" organizations disbanded Hong Kong headquarters, and some "yellow shops" also withdrew from the "yellow economic circle".
Why are they afraid of this? According to Chen Zhihao, Hong Kong's national security law mainly combats "four crimes", including the crime of secession, the crime of subverting state power, the crime of terrorist activities, and the crime of colluding with foreign or foreign forces to endanger national security. In the past, organizations such as "Hong Kong people's aspirations" have been advocating the extreme political views of splitting the country, actively colluding with foreign forces, and even asking foreign governments to sanction Hong Kong, which may violate the Hong Kong national security law, so they "cut" one after another, intending to get rid of the legal responsibility for past actions. This fully reflects the deterrent power of Hong Kong's national security law.
"This does not mean that these people have repented," Tian Feilong further pointed out that they just chose two routes: the first is "confrontation personalization", that is, after leaving the organization, they fight in personal form to seek more covert actions; the other is "confrontation internationalization", which means that overseas "Hong Kong Independence" organizations will be even more bottomless than that of "Hong Kong National Front" retaining overseas branches To engage in activities endangering national security. Under such circumstances, we should be vigilant against "playing the edge ball" around the law.
However, can these "Hong Kong Independence" elements and organizations who have fled overseas escape the law? Tian Feilong pointed out that Hong Kong's national security law stipulates that Hong Kong permanent residents or companies, organizations and other organizations established in Hong Kong shall also apply this law even if they commit related crimes outside Hong Kong. In his view, if "Hong Kong Independence" elements and organizations violate the law overseas, they can be wanted globally through Interpol, and the act of dissolving Hong Kong headquarters is not exempt from any crime in law. As for the past actions of "Hong Kong Independence" elements and organizations in Hong Kong, they can be investigated under two circumstances: one is that the relevant acts and activities spanning before and after the entry into force of the new law can be subject to the unified jurisdiction of the new law; the other is that new evidence appears in the existing investigation process and is of great harm
“港独”逃海外也躲不过 香港国安法深度解读来了
2020年07月02日 13:36 海外网
1,296
原标题：“港独”逃海外也躲不过 香港国安法深度解读来了
海外网7月2日电 《中华人民共和国香港特别行政区维护国家安全法》（香港国安法）6月30日晚正式刊宪生效。多位法律界、学界专家在接受海外网采访时表示，这部法律既坚守“一国”原则，也充分尊重了“两制”。对海内外“港独”组织、外部势力都有针对性的打击。法律的实施是香港回归以来的重大节点，定能拨乱反正，让香港再出发。
特殊安排：香港国安法设立协调机制
香港国安法全文于6月30日晚正式公布，这部法律分为六章，共66条。香港与内地多名法律和学界专家对海外网表示，相关规定不但坚守“一国”原则，强调了国家安全属于中央事权，同时也充分尊重了“两制”。
全国港澳研究会理事、北京航空航天大学副教授田飞龙表示，香港国安法设立了一种“一国两制”下的特殊安排——中央驻港国家安全公署与香港维护国家安全委员会建立协调机制。立法将大部分案件的管辖权授权给香港特区执法机关，仍然适用香港的检控程序，照顾了香港社会的习惯。不过需要强调的是，中央保留了三类特别情形的管辖权，针对的是“大案要案”，以及香港社会无法自己侦破及管辖的案件。
“立法充分考虑了香港的具体情况，既体现国家意志，又兼顾到两地差异”，香港法学交流基金会副主席、法学教授傅健慈表示，立法结合了成文法和普通法的优点，最大程度地信任了香港特区。同时在基本法框架下保障市民的人权自由，平衡社会的期望。
立法过程中，全国人大常委会收集了大量香港市民的意见，包括港区全国人大代表、全国政协委员、香港社团领袖和各界代表人士等。粤港澳大湾区青年总会副主席陈志豪提到，6月28日的人大常委会会议中有一个特殊安排，除港区全国人大常委之外，还有十名港区全国人大代表列席，这充分反映了中央对香港的重视，是坚持“一国两制”的体现。
法网恢恢：“港独”分子别妄想“打擦边球”
在香港国安法通过前夕，乱港分子们生动地诠释了什么叫“闻风丧胆”。黄之锋、罗冠聪及周庭6月30日宣布退出“香港众志”，“香港民族阵线”等“港独”组织解散香港本部，一些“黄店”也退出“黄色经济圈”。
他们为什么怕成这样？陈志豪认为，香港国安法主要打击“四个罪名”，包括分裂国家罪、颠覆国家政权罪、恐怖活动罪、勾结外国或者境外势力危害国家安全罪。而“香港众志”等组织，过去一直在鼓吹分裂国家的极端政治主张，积极勾结外国势力，甚至要求外国政府制裁香港，很可能触犯了香港国安法，因此纷纷“切割”，意图摆脱过去行为的法律责任，而这充分反映了香港国安法的震慑力。
“这并不代表这些人幡然悔悟了”，田飞龙进一步指出，他们只是选择了两条路线：第一条是“对抗个人化”，即脱离组织后以个人形式对抗，寻求行动更隐蔽；另外一种是“对抗国际化”，比如“香港民族阵线”保留了海外分部，海外的“港独”组织会更加无底线地从事危害国家安全的行为。这种情况下，要警惕乱港分子在法律的周围“打擦边球”。
不过，这些逃到海外的“港独”分子和组织就能逃脱法网了吗？田飞龙指出，香港国安法规定，香港永久性居民或者在香港成立的公司、团体等组织，即便是在香港以外实施相关犯罪，也适用本法。他认为，若“港独”分子和组织在海外违反该法，可以通过国际刑警组织进行全球通缉，解散香港本部的行为在法律上并不能豁免任何罪行。而针对“港独”分子及组织过去在香港的所作所为，在两种情况下可以追究：一是有关行为和活动跨越新法生效前后的，可以由新法进行统一管辖；二是有关行为及活动在已有的侦查过程中出现新证据，且具有较大危害性的，也可以进行追溯性的审查。
香港警方1日称，如果在集会、游行中举“港独”旗、叫嚣“香港独立”等口号，甚至煽动“台独”、“藏独”、“疆独”等，皆属违法。对此，田飞龙表示，言论自由和政治表达必须是在合法的范围内，以前一些人享有“过度的政治自由”，现在必须按新法来裁量，新法把“尺子”竖在这里了。
他还指出，该法有一些条款特别针对了外部势力。不具有香港永久性居民身份的人，即便不是在香港实施犯罪，但犯罪结果反映在香港的，或与香港特区有连接点的，也受香港国安法的管辖。
拨云见日：香港回归以来的重大节点
香港国安法通过后，香港特区也迎来了一个特殊的日子。7月1日，是香港回归23周年纪念日。在维多利亚港、在金紫荆广场……一系列庆祝香港回归、庆贺香港国安法立法的活动在全港拉开。
“香港国安法的通过，是‘一国两制’在香港实践具有里程碑意义的事件，是香港回归以来的重大节点。”上海国际问题研究院港澳研究室主任张建指出，这是中央在香港维护国家主权、安全、发展利益，维护香港繁荣稳定的重大举措。香港国安法落地实施后，对香港存在的危害国家安全的活动将起到有效的遏制，也将打压以香港为基地对内地进行渗透、破坏的活动，外部势力介入香港事务的抓手和代理人将被大幅削弱。有利于保护国际投资者的合法利益、保护香港民众的生命财产安全。香港在安全法的护航下，必然会有大改变。
为了这一天，中央在立法过程中做了大量付出。人大常委会一个月内连开两次会，且两次会议相隔不足十天。傅健慈表示，这正是体现出立法的必要性、迫切性、针对性、震慑性。“只是针对极少数危害国家安全行为的人，保障了大多数守法的人”，有助于让“一国两制”行稳致远，市民安居乐业。
而香港市民也普遍理解立法的迫切性。陈志豪称，在中央宣布立法决定后，香港社会各界在网上及社区发起了“撑国安法签名行动”，在短时间内便收集到接近300万位市民的签名，充分反映了香港市民理解相关立法的必要性及迫切性。
“时间紧任务重，但是符合我国宪法及《立法法》规定的所有程序要求。”田飞龙指出，这部法律立法时间虽相对较快，但在立法的科学性、民主性和严谨性方面，都可以说是一部高质量立法。他同时强调，香港国安法是新事物，为了确保执行“不走样”，相关执法机构还须积累相互信任及办案经验，形成合力，打造“无漏洞、无死角”的全覆盖体系。
傅健慈则对立法通过感到很兴奋，身为香港市民的他说，欢迎、拥护立法和实施，香港国安法是香港的“定海神针”，定能拨乱反正，让香港再出发。（海外网 杨佳 朱惠悦 吴倩）
点击进入专题：
聚焦香港局势
"Hong Kong Independence" can't escape from the overseas, so can the in-depth interpretation of Hong Kong's national security law
Overseas network at 13:36, July 02, 2020
1,296
The original title: "Hong Kong Independence" can't escape from the overseas, so can the in-depth interpretation of Hong Kong's national security law
A flag raising ceremony was held at Golden Bauhinia Square in Wanchai on July 1 (Xinhua News Agency)
Haiwai.com, July 2 - the law of the people's Republic of China on the maintenance of national security of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (Hong Kong National Security Law) officially came into force on the evening of June 30. A number of experts from the legal and academic circles said in an interview with aowai.com that the law adheres to the principle of "one country" and fully respects the "two systems". It has targeted attacks on "Hong Kong Independence" organizations at home and abroad and external forces. The implementation of the law has been a major milestone since Hong Kong's return to the motherland. It will set things right and let Hong Kong set out again.
Special arrangement: establishment of coordination mechanism in Hong Kong's national security law
The full text of Hong Kong's national security law was officially announced on the evening of June 30. The law is divided into six chapters and 66 articles. A number of legal and academic experts from Hong Kong and the mainland told the website that the relevant provisions not only adhere to the "one country" principle, but also fully respect the "two systems".
Tian Feilong, director of the National Association for Hong Kong and Macao Studies and associate professor of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, said that Hong Kong's national security law established a special arrangement under "one country, two systems" - the establishment of a coordination mechanism between the central office for national security in Hong Kong and the Hong Kong Committee for the maintenance of national security. The legislation empowers the law enforcement agencies of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region with jurisdiction over most cases. The prosecution procedures in Hong Kong are still applicable and the customs of Hong Kong society are taken into account. However, it needs to be emphasized that the central government has reserved jurisdiction over three special cases, which are "major cases" and cases in which Hong Kong society is unable to detect and administer by itself.
"The legislation fully takes into account the specific situation of Hong Kong, reflecting the will of the state and taking into account the differences between the two places," said Fu Jianci, vice chairman of the Hong Kong law Exchange Foundation and a law professor. The legislation combines the advantages of written law and common law, and trusts the Hong Kong SAR to the greatest extent. At the same time, human rights and freedom of citizens should be guaranteed under the framework of the basic law, and social expectations should be balanced.
In the process of legislation, the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress (NPC) has collected a large number of opinions from Hong Kong citizens, including deputies to the National People's Congress (NPC), members of the National Committee of the Chinese people's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC), community leaders in Hong Kong and representatives from all walks of life. Chen Zhihao, vice chairman of Guangdong Hong Kong Macao big Bay Youth Association, mentioned that there was a special arrangement in the meeting of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress on June 28. In addition to the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress of Hong Kong, there were also 10 deputies to the National People's Congress of Hong Kong, which fully reflected the central government's attention to Hong Kong and reflected the adherence to "one country, two systems".
The restoration of French Open: "Hong Kong Independence" elements do not want to "play edge ball"
On the eve of the enactment of the national security law of Hong Kong, Hong Kong rioters vividly explained what it means to be "scared by the wind". On June 30, Huang Zhifeng, Luo Guancong and Zhou Ting announced their withdrawal from the "Hong Kong consensus", "Hong Kong National Front" and other "Hong Kong Independence" organizations disbanded Hong Kong headquarters, and some "yellow shops" also withdrew from the "yellow economic circle".
Why are they afraid of this? According to Chen Zhihao, Hong Kong's national security law mainly combats "four crimes", including the crime of secession, the crime of subverting state power, the crime of terrorist activities, and the crime of colluding with foreign or foreign forces to endanger national security. In the past, organizations such as "Hong Kong people's aspirations" have been advocating the extreme political views of splitting the country, actively colluding with foreign forces, and even asking foreign governments to sanction Hong Kong, which may violate the Hong Kong national security law, so they "cut" one after another, intending to get rid of the legal responsibility for past actions. This fully reflects the deterrent power of Hong Kong's national security law.
"This does not mean that these people have repented," Tian Feilong further pointed out that they just chose two routes: the first is "confrontation personalization", that is, after leaving the organization, they fight in personal form to seek more covert actions; the other is "confrontation internationalization", which means that overseas "Hong Kong Independence" organizations will be even more bottomless than that of "Hong Kong National Front" retaining overseas branches To engage in activities endangering national security. Under such circumstances, we should be vigilant against "playing the edge ball" around the law.
However, can these "Hong Kong Independence" elements and organizations who have fled overseas escape the law? Tian Feilong pointed out that Hong Kong's national security law stipulates that Hong Kong permanent residents or companies, organizations and other organizations established in Hong Kong shall also apply this law even if they commit related crimes outside Hong Kong. In his view, if "Hong Kong Independence" elements and organizations violate the law overseas, they can be wanted globally through Interpol, and the act of dissolving Hong Kong headquarters is not exempt from any crime in law. As for the past actions of "Hong Kong Independence" elements and organizations in Hong Kong, they can be investigated under two circumstances: one is that the relevant acts and activities spanning before and after the entry into force of the new law can be subject to the unified jurisdiction of the new law; the other is that new evidence appears in the existing investigation process and is of great harm
