• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

HDB to stall holders:Sorry, we cant help

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Jul 24, 2008
Messages
33,627
Points
0
<TABLE id=msgUN border=0 cellSpacing=3 cellPadding=0 width="100%"><TBODY><TR><TD id=msgUNsubj vAlign=top>
icon.aspx
Coffeeshop Chit Chat - HDB to stall holders:Sorry, we cant help</TD><TD id=msgunetc noWrap align=right>
icon.aspx
Subscribe </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><TABLE class=msgtable cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="96%"><TBODY><TR><TD class=msg vAlign=top><TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%"><TBODY><TR class=msghead><TD class=msgbfr1 width="1%"> </TD><TD><TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR class=msghead><TD class=msgF width="1%" noWrap align=right>From: </TD><TD class=msgFname width="68%" noWrap>CPL (kojakbt22) <NOBR>
icon.aspx
</NOBR> </TD><TD class=msgDate width="30%" noWrap align=right>Oct-21 4:30 am </TD></TR><TR class=msghead><TD class=msgT height=20 width="1%" noWrap align=right>To: </TD><TD class=msgTname width="68%" noWrap>ALL <NOBR></NOBR></TD><TD class=msgNum noWrap align=right> (1 of 17) </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR><TR><TD class=msgleft rowSpan=4 width="1%"> </TD><TD class=wintiny noWrap align=right>23065.1 </TD></TR><TR><TD height=8></TD></TR><TR><TD class=msgtxt>HDB clarifies it cannot interfere in sale of privately-owned wet markets
Posted: 21 October 2009 1331 hrs
SINGAPORE: The Housing and Development Board (HDB) has said it cannot take over the wet markets owned by private operators or interfere with the commercial negotiation between the new owner and the stallholders when such wet markets change hands.

The HDB also cannot "impose new requirements that are more stringent on the new owner, compared to those already imposed on the existing one".

HDB said this in a statement on Wednesday in response to recent media reports on the concerns of some stallholders affected by the sale of five wet markets owned by a commercial operator.

These five markets are located in Choa Chu Kang Street 62, Choa Chu Kang Avenue 1, Serangoon Avenue 3, Bukit Batok West Avenue 8 and Fajar Road.

Some of the stallholders have asked the government to intervene so that they can retain their stalls at current rents after the change in the commercial owner of the wet markets.

HDB explained that the existing owner, Heeton, bought four of the five wet markets through separate tenders called by HDB in 1994 and 1996 and one wet market through a resale.

The existing stallholders are, therefore, tenants of Heeton and not HDB. They are also not the former street hawkers who were resettled in centres that are now managed by the National Environment Agency.

HDB said it "understands the concerns of the stallholders that there may be changes to their terms and conditions for tenancy after the sale of the wet markets to a new commercial owner". But it cannot interfere as "the sale of the wet markets is a property transaction between two private parties".

The new owner, Sheng Siong Property, has informed HDB that it is prepared to continue renting out the wet market stalls to the existing stallholders. It will need to discuss the terms and conditions with affected stallholders after the sale of the wet markets is completed.

For affected stallholders who would like to look for alternative stalls, HDB can refer them to vacant market stalls in NEA-managed centres.

HDB will also ensure that the marketing needs of residents are not compromised in the process. Hence, it has disallowed the conversion of the wet markets to supermarkets based on the reasons explained earlier.

HDB will work closely with the local advisers, grassroots leaders and the various stakeholders to manage the change in ownership at the five affected wet markets.

[email protected]

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 
Greed is what makes the pappies blood flow. The reason for the removal of the wetmarkets is because the pappies have a hard time taxing the earnings of the stall holders. IT is a fact that the lower income buy their groceries from the wet markets because it is cheaper than making purchases at a supermarket.

The lower income groups will soon be having to fork out at least 30% more in expenditure should they purchase their groceries from a wet market. This group is already facing a ahrd time meeting conservancy and mortgage payments. The end-result is that more families will find themselves evicted by the HDB and banks.

Maybe they are doing this to increase their tax coffers and also to increase the supply of HDB to FTs? I hope the pappies lose an additional 15% of votes from this move.
 
i think teo chee hean said last week... "residents want to preserved the values of wet market and we understand that, but we must accept the change and move forward..."

he is saying option A is good and must be respected
BUT we must also accept option B

KNN... he is paid millions to say both are good. so he is always right :D
 
Back
Top