• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Hard Truth, But 154th Refuse to Publish in Print!

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR>Is there a shortage, or are doctors fleeing public sector?
</TR><!-- headline one : end --><!-- show image if available --></TBODY></TABLE>




<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"--><!-- more than 4 paragraphs -->I HAVE concerns about plans to build a third medical school. Is an undertaking that will cost hundreds of millions of dollars a priority in the current economic climate?
One reason given is the shortage of doctors in Singapore. But is this 'shortage' absolute or merely relative?
It is no secret that there is a continuous and significant exodus of medical personnel from the public sector, resulting in a severe imbalance of manpower. How do you explain the overflowing polyclinics, where each doctor sees an average of 60 patients in four hours? Compare this to general practitioner (GP) establishments, of which there can be up to five in a single HDB block, with only a smattering of patients each day. The same situation applies to specialist outpatient clinics in restructured and private hospitals.
Also, has the Ministry of Health (MOH) collected any statistics on the career paths of local female medical school graduates? Since the enrolment quota of this group was lifted a few years ago, how many are expected to remain in full-time service, and how many will go part time or stop work altogether to start or care for their families?
I ask this because I know of many married female colleagues who have already cut down on their working hours or abandoned their medical careers completely. Obviously, this will have an impact on the doctor-patient ratio.
While I do not question the reasons for these important life decisions - many are understandable and necessary - perhaps the MOH can look into these factors and discuss what alternative options are available.
Recruiting more doctors is merely a stop-gap measure and fails to address more deep-seated issues. Why do doctors keep leaving for private practice? How can medical talent be retained where it is most needed? What can be done to encourage better use of GP clinics to help offload impossible patient numbers at polyclinics, specialist outpatient clinics and increasingly misused and abused emergency departments?
th_suwrap31m.jpg


Frankly speaking, I donch know! *hee*hee*

If the Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine does indeed decide to increase its yearly intake of students, perhaps modifications to the curriculum can be made so fixed-capacity venues can be used more efficiently. For example, move all core lectures online so students can tune in at their convenience, rather than build an entirely new auditorium to accommodate a larger audience.
Last but not least, I remind proponents of this third medical school that quantity does not equal quality. In my 10 years in the workforce, I have encountered more than my fair share of colleagues who show complete disregard for the Hippocratic Oath.

=> That is, no money, no talk?Dr Oh Jen Jen
 

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR>Foreign-trained medical students just as good
</TR><!-- headline one : end --><!-- show image if available --></TBODY></TABLE>




<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"--><!-- more than 4 paragraphs -->I READ Miss Samantha Yeo's letter last Friday, 'Unfair to subsidise overseas medical students', with dismay. The generalisation that foreign medical graduates are potentially inferior to locally trained doctors is presumptive and unsubstantiated. I am a third-year medical student at the University of Oxford, and I assure Miss Yeo that the course, as in Singapore, is most rigorous, and the highest standards are expected at all times. Furthermore, the following should be highlighted:
- Ensuring which schools are competent in educating their students is the prerogative of the Singapore Medical Council. The council publishes a list of recognised basic medical qualifications, easily accessed via its website. If Miss Yeo is suggesting that there are foreign-trained doctors practising in Singapore whose clinical aptitude is wanting, then this is worrying, and the council should be alerted.
- There has been a recognised need for more doctors in Singapore and it would be good if suitably qualified citizens returned to live, work and contribute. Consequently, it would not be unreasonable for the Government to subsidise overseas medical education, provided those who receive such subsidies have similar obligations to serve bonds, as their counterparts at the National University of Singapore (NUS).
For 'quality control' purposes, such subsidies should be limited to medical schools recognised by the Singapore Medical Council. I have often seen an unverified figure of $450,000 for an unsubsidised five-year medical course at NUS. This figure is similar to the cost of the full six years at my university.
No education, including medical, can be defined just by the qualification obtained. A foreign education affords me refreshing and diverse perspectives on Singapore, as well as other countries. It would be insular to focus on potential inadequacies of an education abroad. Rather, to be open to different opportunities and viewpoints would enrich the clinical landscape. Not to do so would only mire us in the status quo. Jen Wei Ying (Miss)
 

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR>Raising intake of medical schools most viable option for now
</TR><!-- headline one : end --><!-- show image if available --></TBODY></TABLE>




<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"--><!-- more than 4 paragraphs -->I REFER to the recent discussion about the shortage of doctors and possible solutions to the problem.
One problem is that of junior doctors leaving the public sector after serving their bonds. The problem is an old one and the Government has not found the right policies to balance the provision of affordable health care for the masses against providing palatable working conditions for junior doctors.
Setting up a third local medical school is resource-straining and will require a long time for its benefits to materialise. Solutions such as hiring more foreign doctors to ease the workload in public hospitals is temporary, but at least it can improve the situation in the short to medium term.
Expanding the current medical schools' capacity is still the most viable option for now. If health-care costs are to be kept affordable, despite rising costs of treatment and increased patient volume, supply must be stretched or expanded. There is no other way. Currently, demand is growing relentlessly, while supply lags way behind. The buck has to stop somewhere and junior doctors are shouldering it collectively. Tay Xiong Sheng
 
Top