http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...suggests-Syrian-refugees-affiliated-ISIS.html
Amos would be pleased.
Tump wont meet Yaccob for sure.
Amos would be pleased.
Tump wont meet Yaccob for sure.
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Guess the religion: Musliam Woman escorted out of Trump rally
- Thread starter steffychun
- Start date
She is a terrorist supporter when she failed to admit that there is a Islamic terrorist problem. Also, CAIR in USA is a terrorist organisation that support HAMAS, a well-know terrorist organisation.
She would do better and smart if she could ditch her stupid religion and embrace free-thinking. The fact that she remains a Muslims only goes to show that she is stupid and support terrorist belief.
She would do better and smart if she could ditch her stupid religion and embrace free-thinking. The fact that she remains a Muslims only goes to show that she is stupid and support terrorist belief.
Are PAP Muslims Hamas lovers
Trump is right. US has a Muslim problem. Only when you can identify the problem, can you start looking for solution. This happened on 8th Jan 2016.
Philadelphia Police Officer Shot By Alleged Islamic Extremist
[video=youtube;aDw7HqvpPiE]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDw7HqvpPiE[/video]
Philadelphia Muslim Shoots Police Officer While He Is In His Patrol Car
[video=youtube;6eBkYCigXVg]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6eBkYCigXVg[/video]
Philadelphia Police Officer Shot By Alleged Islamic Extremist
[video=youtube;aDw7HqvpPiE]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDw7HqvpPiE[/video]
Philadelphia Muslim Shoots Police Officer While He Is In His Patrol Car
[video=youtube;6eBkYCigXVg]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6eBkYCigXVg[/video]
white police shot coloured in America
No need for white to shoot black. The black already shooting each other.
[video=youtube;fvmToBq_S_E]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvmToBq_S_E[/video]
[video=youtube;12FQ2YmPJnE]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=12FQ2YmPJnE[/video]
Muslim problem in UK as well
UK and Europe gone case liao. They will become Islamic country in 50 to 100 years time if not sooner. Cos the Muslim reproduce like rabbit and once a Muslim, you die a Muslim. And if Sharia law established once Muslims in Europe become the big majority, you cannot renounce unless you die. So Europe gone case liao. The stupid liberals and politically correct bullshit media is the cause of it.
Even in Singapore where Muslims are given free choice to renounce Islam without having to die, most are happy to remain a retard by name even if they don't believe in the religion.
Last edited:
1000 years or so ago, Muslim already at today's French border in Western Europe and in Yugoslavia in Eastern Europe. And then, they started to implode and retreated to their shell till recently.
1000 years or so ago, there was no politically correct liberal bullshits to stop the king clearing out Muslims out of French border.
Actually millions of Muslims have left Islam and more do so each day. The truth of Islam's demonic nature is being discovered by not only non-Muslims but by Muslims. No decent human being wants to be associated with such a demonic ideology. Only the apologists, Satanic and those that gain financially and through other means stay as Muslims. Even imams and Islamic jurists leave Islam once they are not able to rationalize the evils committed by Profit Muhammed.
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/muhammad/myths-mu-home.htm
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/023-violence.htm
The most favourite quote of Muslims when they try to show the quran teaches peace is this quote:
"Whoever kills a soul it is as if he had slain mankind entirely" Quran 5:32
However, if you check the quran, you will find the full verse of Quran 5:32
Because of that, We decreed upon the Children of Israel that whoever kills a soul unless for a soul or for corruption [done] in the land - it is as if he had slain mankind entirely. And whoever saves one - it is as if he had saved mankind entirely. And our messengers had certainly come to them with clear proofs. Then indeed many of them, [even] after that, throughout the land, were transgressors.
And 5:33 reads as such:
Indeed, the penalty for those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and strive upon earth [to cause] corruption is none but that they be killed or crucified or that their hands and feet be cut off from opposite sides or that they be exiled from the land. That is for them a disgrace in this world; and for them in the Hereafter is a great punishment,
From the verses above you can see clearly that Muslims are a bunch of fucking demonic liars! Only fools will ever believe a Muslim. I'm not talking about normal Muslims who abuse the verses but every Muslim scholar that quotes verse 5:32 commit the same lie. FUCKING LYING BASTARDS!
When it comes to religion and politics, never ever trust a Muslim. Always check and double check what they say or better yet just dont believe them since telling the truth is too difficult for them.
"Whoever kills a soul it is as if he had slain mankind entirely" Quran 5:32
However, if you check the quran, you will find the full verse of Quran 5:32
Because of that, We decreed upon the Children of Israel that whoever kills a soul unless for a soul or for corruption [done] in the land - it is as if he had slain mankind entirely. And whoever saves one - it is as if he had saved mankind entirely. And our messengers had certainly come to them with clear proofs. Then indeed many of them, [even] after that, throughout the land, were transgressors.
And 5:33 reads as such:
Indeed, the penalty for those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and strive upon earth [to cause] corruption is none but that they be killed or crucified or that their hands and feet be cut off from opposite sides or that they be exiled from the land. That is for them a disgrace in this world; and for them in the Hereafter is a great punishment,
From the verses above you can see clearly that Muslims are a bunch of fucking demonic liars! Only fools will ever believe a Muslim. I'm not talking about normal Muslims who abuse the verses but every Muslim scholar that quotes verse 5:32 commit the same lie. FUCKING LYING BASTARDS!
When it comes to religion and politics, never ever trust a Muslim. Always check and double check what they say or better yet just dont believe them since telling the truth is too difficult for them.
Thanks to charles martel for example who chased out you m&d slimes. Spain was muslim for like 800 years before they were chased out of the iberian peninsula.
Islam was and still is nothing but a society based on war and looting. They have no idea how to build a society based on economy and creating value. They war, loot and sell slaves. This was what the despicable Profit Muhammed did and this is his legacy he left behind for the bastard Muslims who continue his Satanic ways to destroy peace and mankind.
The Islamic caliphate from the 6th - 10th century AD were fairly advanced as compared to Europe. You could read about well-known Islamic centres such as Baghdad and Cordoba. Science and literacy declined after these famed Islamic centres of learning were sacked by barbarians from Spain and Mongol regions.
Cordoba was Spain you dumbfuck! Spain was one of Europe's most advanced societies until it succumbed to about 500 years of Muslim attacks. The Satanic Muslims looted and enslaved Spain's finest as the bastards did elsewhere that they conquered. The bastard Muslims committed piracy across the Mediterranean seas and controlled the Silk Roads and these stifled trade for Europe and even China. This is why the Europeans decided to colonize the Moose Limps so that trade could again be free from piracy. With trade came peace and prosperity and growth in human advancement. The bastard Satanic Moose Limps live solely on warring and looting. You just have to look at Moose Limp countries to see they have no interest in human advancement. The Islamic scripture they read has more or less been the same since Pedo Mo was around. They've always been a useless demonic bastards that live on others' hardwork.
Medieval Islamic science is thought to be its crown jewel. Yet what is meant by Islamic in this sense? Non-Muslims--Christians, Jews, and Zoroastrians--laid the foundations for this science. They relied mainly on Hellenic sources, but also Persian and Indian ones. Empirical findings risked being disregarded if they challenged the authority of the Koran in any way. In astronomy Islamic toponymics has of course left significant traces in the star map: Aldbeberan, Betelgeuse, Rigel. However, Islamic astronomy remained tied to Ptolemy’s Almagest. As such, it was incapable of freeing itself from geocentrism—there never was an Arab Copernicus. Algebra, to be sure, bears an Arabic name, but the basis of the discipline is Greek. Moreover, the "Arabic" numbers were originally Indian. It was the Indians who invented the all-important concept of zero.
What is usually termed Islamic philosophy consisted mainly of footnotes to the Greek thinkers. Philosophy always had a precarious situation, threatened by the perception of any encroachment on religious orthodoxy. Restrictions on freedom of thought are summed up by the concept of the "closing of the gate of Ijtihad." Somewhat loosely, one can render ijtihad as "freedom of thought." In the light of this event, which may have occurred as long as a thousand years ago, there is no longer any room for debate on many key questions. Today the Muslim intelligentsia, the ulema, is extraordinarily diffuse in its distribution. Yet the melancholy truth is that this body of thinkers has achieved uniformity on such subjects as homosexuality, the status of women, and the lending of money for interest. For a long time, there has been no room for debate on these matters.
In short, "Golden Age" achievements in science and philosophy occurred not because of Islam but in spite of it.
But what about those accounts of Western scholars traveling to Moorish Spain to study and translate Islamic versions of the Greek scientific classics? Such reports are true, but in due course Europe learned that there were better versions of these texts, in the original Greek, housed in the libraries of Byzantium.
And what about those numerous, well-stocked libraries of Andalusia that we hear about? Once again, this claim is misleading. By and large the "libraries" consisted of locked cabinets in madrasas containing a few battered Korans and commentaries. Moorish civilization was in fact a condominium, established on both sides of the straits. Morocco, not ravaged by the Catholic kings, had a similar culture and similar wealth. If there were great libraries they should have flourished in Morocco as well as in al-Andalus. Where are Morocco’s great libraries?
In art the flourishing craft traditions fostered the creation of many beguiling objects in metalwork, pottery, illuminated manuscripts. Yet Islam created no Giotto or Raphael; no Rembrandt or Rubens. This was not because of a supposed ban on images—there are plenty of images in manuscripts, but because painting as such never developed as a major art.
So the fabled Golden Age of Islam is mostly a myth. But what about the West? Wasn’t it shrouded in darkness, dependent on cultural imports from Islam? Not very much. Gothic architecture, one of the most splendid achievements of Europe’s "Dark Age,"was not originally "Saracen." Scholars have long exploded that claim. And the intricate rhymes and strophe patterns of Provençal poetry, so far from being derived from Islam, served in fact as the model for Arabic works of similar character in Andalusia. Paper, it is true, came to us from Islamic lands, but the Muslims had purloined the technique from the Chinese.
In the theory and practice of politics, Islam never developed any tradition of representative government or a doctrine of the separation of powers. Religious and secular authority were inextricably mixed in Islam. In Islamic tradition the concept of the rule of law as we know it is absent, as this requires a powerful tradition of secular law. With its mixture of Roman law and the common law, the West successfully forged such an instrument. Islam only created Shari’a law, which, bizarrely, its adepts wish to impose on Western Europe. Until the recent controversial insistence on introducing this religious law, the Western tradition of jurisprudence remained the norm throughout the world, including such countries as Turkey, India, and Japan.
Perhaps the least known accomplishment of the West lies in its ability to bridge science, on the one hand, and daily life on the other. Wind mills and water mills were already known in ancient times. Yet they proliferated only after 1000 in Western Europe. Experiments with their gears and drives led to the creation of a host of other machines. In a development that culminated in the Industrial Revolution, Europe became a culture of machines. Burdened by a fatuous sense of its own superiority, Islam was very slow to accept Western machines.
Why did the West become so mechanically conscious? The answer lies in large measure in social structure. Although there were large serf populations, slavery as such died out in Western Europe (unlike Islam, where reputedly the peculiar institution survives until this day). Absence of slaves (yielding a labor shortage, abetted eventually by the Black Death), required substitutes of a nonhuman variety. To tend these machines a new class of artisans arose, outside of the normal triad of clergy, nobles, and serfs. Eventually the advance of the interests of the artisans and the cultivation of machines became inseparable.
Such was the accomplishment of "Dark Age" Europe.
In the foregoing I have sought to expose the myth of the Islamic Golden Age. But of course it took two to tango. It became conventional wisdom to laud Islam’s splendor in contrast to the West’s squalor.
Whence did the complementary myth of Europe’s Dark Ages arise? Historians of ideas have traced it back to the Renaissance, whose adepts sought to differentiate themselves in this manner from the preceding Gothic period. However, the notion of the Dark Ages only really came into its own in the eighteenth-century Enlightenment, when writers like Gibbon and Voltaire sought to exalt Islam (Golden Age myth and all) as a counterweight to Christianity.
Nineteenth-century Romantics shifted attention to Moorish Spain, viewed in its full pathos as one of history’s great lost causes. A well-known American example is the tales of The Alhambra (1832) by Washington Irving. To be sure, the expulsion of the Moors, following that of the Jews, served to impoverish the cultural life of the Peninsula, as Germán Arciniegas and others have emphasized. What is often forgotten, however, is that starting in the eleventh century much of the brilliance of Moorish civilization had been extinguished by two puritanical Berber groups, the Almoravids and Almohads.
For different reasons, then, Westerners and Muslims alike have had an interest in promoting the myth of Golden Age Islam. The former were seeking to castigate certain trends in their own society; the latter to recover a glorious past. It is time, though, to take off the rose-colored glasses.
PS For the most part my arguments against the myth of Islam’s Golden Age are not new. For a recent contribution along these lines, see Serge Trifkovic’s polemic The Sword of Islam (2000).
What I have added are two comparative points. 1) The European Middle Ages were not simply a horrible nightmare of barbarism and ignorance, as the Enlightenment would have it. Its achievements, particularly in the realm of technology, were extraodinary. I may return to this theme later. 2) The record has been distorted by the omission of a third major player, China. Kenneth Pomeranz (The Great Divergence: China, Europe and the Making of the Modern World Economy, 2000) has argued, convincingly I think, that that the Song Dynasty (960-1279) was the most advanced of its day, outpacing both Islam and Europe. Those who extol medieval Islam charge doubters with ethnocentrism. They themselves are guilty of this fault, because they regularly omit China.
http://dyneslines.blogspot.sg/2006/02/myth-of-islamic-golden-age.html
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/myths-of-islam.htm
http://fjordman.blogspot.sg/2005/05/myths-about-islamic-science.html
http://www.inthenameofallah.org/myth of islamic science.html
What is usually termed Islamic philosophy consisted mainly of footnotes to the Greek thinkers. Philosophy always had a precarious situation, threatened by the perception of any encroachment on religious orthodoxy. Restrictions on freedom of thought are summed up by the concept of the "closing of the gate of Ijtihad." Somewhat loosely, one can render ijtihad as "freedom of thought." In the light of this event, which may have occurred as long as a thousand years ago, there is no longer any room for debate on many key questions. Today the Muslim intelligentsia, the ulema, is extraordinarily diffuse in its distribution. Yet the melancholy truth is that this body of thinkers has achieved uniformity on such subjects as homosexuality, the status of women, and the lending of money for interest. For a long time, there has been no room for debate on these matters.
In short, "Golden Age" achievements in science and philosophy occurred not because of Islam but in spite of it.
But what about those accounts of Western scholars traveling to Moorish Spain to study and translate Islamic versions of the Greek scientific classics? Such reports are true, but in due course Europe learned that there were better versions of these texts, in the original Greek, housed in the libraries of Byzantium.
And what about those numerous, well-stocked libraries of Andalusia that we hear about? Once again, this claim is misleading. By and large the "libraries" consisted of locked cabinets in madrasas containing a few battered Korans and commentaries. Moorish civilization was in fact a condominium, established on both sides of the straits. Morocco, not ravaged by the Catholic kings, had a similar culture and similar wealth. If there were great libraries they should have flourished in Morocco as well as in al-Andalus. Where are Morocco’s great libraries?
In art the flourishing craft traditions fostered the creation of many beguiling objects in metalwork, pottery, illuminated manuscripts. Yet Islam created no Giotto or Raphael; no Rembrandt or Rubens. This was not because of a supposed ban on images—there are plenty of images in manuscripts, but because painting as such never developed as a major art.
So the fabled Golden Age of Islam is mostly a myth. But what about the West? Wasn’t it shrouded in darkness, dependent on cultural imports from Islam? Not very much. Gothic architecture, one of the most splendid achievements of Europe’s "Dark Age,"was not originally "Saracen." Scholars have long exploded that claim. And the intricate rhymes and strophe patterns of Provençal poetry, so far from being derived from Islam, served in fact as the model for Arabic works of similar character in Andalusia. Paper, it is true, came to us from Islamic lands, but the Muslims had purloined the technique from the Chinese.
In the theory and practice of politics, Islam never developed any tradition of representative government or a doctrine of the separation of powers. Religious and secular authority were inextricably mixed in Islam. In Islamic tradition the concept of the rule of law as we know it is absent, as this requires a powerful tradition of secular law. With its mixture of Roman law and the common law, the West successfully forged such an instrument. Islam only created Shari’a law, which, bizarrely, its adepts wish to impose on Western Europe. Until the recent controversial insistence on introducing this religious law, the Western tradition of jurisprudence remained the norm throughout the world, including such countries as Turkey, India, and Japan.
Perhaps the least known accomplishment of the West lies in its ability to bridge science, on the one hand, and daily life on the other. Wind mills and water mills were already known in ancient times. Yet they proliferated only after 1000 in Western Europe. Experiments with their gears and drives led to the creation of a host of other machines. In a development that culminated in the Industrial Revolution, Europe became a culture of machines. Burdened by a fatuous sense of its own superiority, Islam was very slow to accept Western machines.
Why did the West become so mechanically conscious? The answer lies in large measure in social structure. Although there were large serf populations, slavery as such died out in Western Europe (unlike Islam, where reputedly the peculiar institution survives until this day). Absence of slaves (yielding a labor shortage, abetted eventually by the Black Death), required substitutes of a nonhuman variety. To tend these machines a new class of artisans arose, outside of the normal triad of clergy, nobles, and serfs. Eventually the advance of the interests of the artisans and the cultivation of machines became inseparable.
Such was the accomplishment of "Dark Age" Europe.
In the foregoing I have sought to expose the myth of the Islamic Golden Age. But of course it took two to tango. It became conventional wisdom to laud Islam’s splendor in contrast to the West’s squalor.
Whence did the complementary myth of Europe’s Dark Ages arise? Historians of ideas have traced it back to the Renaissance, whose adepts sought to differentiate themselves in this manner from the preceding Gothic period. However, the notion of the Dark Ages only really came into its own in the eighteenth-century Enlightenment, when writers like Gibbon and Voltaire sought to exalt Islam (Golden Age myth and all) as a counterweight to Christianity.
Nineteenth-century Romantics shifted attention to Moorish Spain, viewed in its full pathos as one of history’s great lost causes. A well-known American example is the tales of The Alhambra (1832) by Washington Irving. To be sure, the expulsion of the Moors, following that of the Jews, served to impoverish the cultural life of the Peninsula, as Germán Arciniegas and others have emphasized. What is often forgotten, however, is that starting in the eleventh century much of the brilliance of Moorish civilization had been extinguished by two puritanical Berber groups, the Almoravids and Almohads.
For different reasons, then, Westerners and Muslims alike have had an interest in promoting the myth of Golden Age Islam. The former were seeking to castigate certain trends in their own society; the latter to recover a glorious past. It is time, though, to take off the rose-colored glasses.
PS For the most part my arguments against the myth of Islam’s Golden Age are not new. For a recent contribution along these lines, see Serge Trifkovic’s polemic The Sword of Islam (2000).
What I have added are two comparative points. 1) The European Middle Ages were not simply a horrible nightmare of barbarism and ignorance, as the Enlightenment would have it. Its achievements, particularly in the realm of technology, were extraodinary. I may return to this theme later. 2) The record has been distorted by the omission of a third major player, China. Kenneth Pomeranz (The Great Divergence: China, Europe and the Making of the Modern World Economy, 2000) has argued, convincingly I think, that that the Song Dynasty (960-1279) was the most advanced of its day, outpacing both Islam and Europe. Those who extol medieval Islam charge doubters with ethnocentrism. They themselves are guilty of this fault, because they regularly omit China.
http://dyneslines.blogspot.sg/2006/02/myth-of-islamic-golden-age.html
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/myths-of-islam.htm
http://fjordman.blogspot.sg/2005/05/myths-about-islamic-science.html
http://www.inthenameofallah.org/myth of islamic science.html
tell this to Speaker Halim.
Senseless killing of innocent men, women and children, comprising even those practising Muslims, by terrorists like those from ISIS and their cohorts in the name of Islam is one important factor that makes people give up this religion. It does not make sense for true Muslims to kill fellow Muslims. Allah is the same God (if there is one) to all Muslims.
Similar threads
