- Joined
- Apr 14, 2011
- Messages
- 17,693
- Points
- 113
Ex-head of PA youth network handed jail sentence for sexually assaulting teen
Samuel Devaraj
UPDATED Mar 10, 2025, 06:40 PM
SINGAPORE - A man who previously worked with young people at the People’s Association (PA) has been handed a jail sentence of 10 years and 6 months’ for sexually assaulting a boy when he was only 16 years old.
The court heard that Ranjeet Prasad manipulated the teen who had aspirations of becoming a singer or an actor. The abuse took place in 2007.
The accused, who the prosecution said showed a total lack of remorse, was found guilty on March 3 of three counts of having carnal intercourse against the order of nature.
In sentencing Ranjeet, District Judge John Ng took into account that there was abuse of the position of authority by the accused.
The judge said the incidents negatively impacted the victim’s life, adding: “He had a girlfriend at that point in time, and the incidents had left him questioning his sexual orientation and prospects for marriage.”
Ranjeet first met the teen when in 2007 at an office in Paya Lebar. There is a gag order in place to protect the identity of the victim.
The accused was then managing PA’s community projects in the south-east/north-west Community Development Council (CDC) and oversaw the south-east CDC’s youth network programme.
In his testimony, the victim shared that he had been excited to join the youth network as it involved modelling.
Catch up on the news that everyone’s talking about
Sign up
By signing up, I accept SPH Media's Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy as amended from time to time.
Yes, I would also like to receive SPH Media Group's
SPH Media Limited, its related corporations and affiliates as well as their agents and authorised service providers.
marketing and promotions.
It was something that he was interested to pursue, in line with his hopes of becoming a singer or actor.
In a subsequent meeting, Ranjeet asked the victim if he was interested in modelling, and told him that he had the potential to do well and that he was interested to work with him.
Seeing that the victim was keen, the accused took down his contact number and later messaged him. He asked him “how far he was willing to go” and whether he had performed oral sex before.
The victim said no, and testified that he was confused at that moment.
Some time later, Ranjeet invited him to his office. The teen said he felt excited and agreed because he thought he might be securing a photoshoot or could be signed up or recruited as a talent.
At that time, he felt Ranjeet’s earlier question of a sexual nature was only a playful one.
Man who preyed on 3 girls, including sister, gets 16 years’ jail and caning for sex offencesTeen who sexually assaulted younger sister ordered to undergo reformative training
At the office, the accused asked the teen if he wanted to get himself into a photoshoot and asked him if he was “adventurous”.
Ranjeet took the teen to a public toilet and made him perform a sexual act on the accused in one of the cubicles.
A week or two later, Ranjeet arranged to meet the victim at Lavender. The victim only agreed because he again thought that an audition or photoshoot was being arranged for him.
The accused instead took him to a hotel and undressed himself and told the boy to follow suit. The victim felt he had to get it “done and over with”.
Ranjeet then made the victim perform a sexual act on him, before sexually penetrating him.
On July 24, 2018, the victim contacted the accused, who had became PA’s head of Youth and Sports in 2017, via Facebook Messenger.
He wanted to meet Ranjeet, to let him know how the acts he had subjected to had destroyed him.
There was an exchange of messages before the accused called and spoke to the victim on the phone, but Ranjeet subsequently blocked the victim on social media.
On May 30, 2020, the victim wrote to Ranjeet’s work e-mail address, where the teen accused him of having manipulated him into engaging in sexual activities at a carpark toilet and in a hotel room.
Ranjeet did not respond. The victim eventually lodged a police report on Aug 24, 2020.
During the trial, the accused, who was represented by Mr Martin De Cruz, denied committing any of the acts but Judge Ng said he had no reservations in believing the victim’s account.
He said the teen’s description from his memory of the incident in the toilet, was sufficiently detailed in particulars and connected in sequence.
Judge Ng also said the victim had no motive to lie and nothing to gain from fabricating untruths against Ranjeet.
He added that the victim could not tell anyone about the abuse as his strong religious upbringing made him fearful.
Man sexually assaulted intellectually disabled daughter, 11, in shared bedroom over 3 yearsJail for man who filmed girlfriend, colleague having sex with him after blindfolding them
In sentencing Ranjeet, Judge Ng said it was aggravating that the accused took advantage of a youthful person who was in his late teens to satisfy his lust.
“The acts of the accused and the manner of luring the victim with the promise of a bright future revealed a highly corruptive influence being exerted by the accused to achieve his lascivious aims.
“This is particularly aggravating,” he added.
Ranjeet is appealing against the conviction and sentence.
The Straits Times has reached out to PA for comment.
Ex-head of PA youth network handed jail sentence for sexually assaulting teen
Samuel Devaraj
UPDATED Mar 10, 2025, 06:40 PM
SINGAPORE - A man who previously worked with young people at the People’s Association (PA) has been handed a jail sentence of 10 years and 6 months’ for sexually assaulting a boy when he was only 16 years old.
The court heard that Ranjeet Prasad manipulated the teen who had aspirations of becoming a singer or an actor. The abuse took place in 2007.
The accused, who the prosecution said showed a total lack of remorse, was found guilty on March 3 of three counts of having carnal intercourse against the order of nature.
In sentencing Ranjeet, District Judge John Ng took into account that there was abuse of the position of authority by the accused.
The judge said the incidents negatively impacted the victim’s life, adding: “He had a girlfriend at that point in time, and the incidents had left him questioning his sexual orientation and prospects for marriage.”
Ranjeet first met the teen when in 2007 at an office in Paya Lebar. There is a gag order in place to protect the identity of the victim.
The accused was then managing PA’s community projects in the south-east/north-west Community Development Council (CDC) and oversaw the south-east CDC’s youth network programme.
In his testimony, the victim shared that he had been excited to join the youth network as it involved modelling.
Catch up on the news that everyone’s talking about
Sign up
By signing up, I accept SPH Media's Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy as amended from time to time.
Yes, I would also like to receive SPH Media Group's
SPH Media Limited, its related corporations and affiliates as well as their agents and authorised service providers.
marketing and promotions.
It was something that he was interested to pursue, in line with his hopes of becoming a singer or actor.In a subsequent meeting, Ranjeet asked the victim if he was interested in modelling, and told him that he had the potential to do well and that he was interested to work with him.
Seeing that the victim was keen, the accused took down his contact number and later messaged him. He asked him “how far he was willing to go” and whether he had performed oral sex before.
The victim said no, and testified that he was confused at that moment.
Some time later, Ranjeet invited him to his office. The teen said he felt excited and agreed because he thought he might be securing a photoshoot or could be signed up or recruited as a talent.
At that time, he felt Ranjeet’s earlier question of a sexual nature was only a playful one.
Man who preyed on 3 girls, including sister, gets 16 years’ jail and caning for sex offencesTeen who sexually assaulted younger sister ordered to undergo reformative training
At the office, the accused asked the teen if he wanted to get himself into a photoshoot and asked him if he was “adventurous”.
Ranjeet took the teen to a public toilet and made him perform a sexual act on the accused in one of the cubicles.
A week or two later, Ranjeet arranged to meet the victim at Lavender. The victim only agreed because he again thought that an audition or photoshoot was being arranged for him.
The accused instead took him to a hotel and undressed himself and told the boy to follow suit. The victim felt he had to get it “done and over with”.
Ranjeet then made the victim perform a sexual act on him, before sexually penetrating him.
On July 24, 2018, the victim contacted the accused, who had became PA’s head of Youth and Sports in 2017, via Facebook Messenger.
He wanted to meet Ranjeet, to let him know how the acts he had subjected to had destroyed him.
There was an exchange of messages before the accused called and spoke to the victim on the phone, but Ranjeet subsequently blocked the victim on social media.
On May 30, 2020, the victim wrote to Ranjeet’s work e-mail address, where the teen accused him of having manipulated him into engaging in sexual activities at a carpark toilet and in a hotel room.
Ranjeet did not respond. The victim eventually lodged a police report on Aug 24, 2020.
During the trial, the accused, who was represented by Mr Martin De Cruz, denied committing any of the acts but Judge Ng said he had no reservations in believing the victim’s account.
He said the teen’s description from his memory of the incident in the toilet, was sufficiently detailed in particulars and connected in sequence.
Judge Ng also said the victim had no motive to lie and nothing to gain from fabricating untruths against Ranjeet.
He added that the victim could not tell anyone about the abuse as his strong religious upbringing made him fearful.
Man sexually assaulted intellectually disabled daughter, 11, in shared bedroom over 3 yearsJail for man who filmed girlfriend, colleague having sex with him after blindfolding them
In sentencing Ranjeet, Judge Ng said it was aggravating that the accused took advantage of a youthful person who was in his late teens to satisfy his lust.
“The acts of the accused and the manner of luring the victim with the promise of a bright future revealed a highly corruptive influence being exerted by the accused to achieve his lascivious aims.
“This is particularly aggravating,” he added.
Ranjeet is appealing against the conviction and sentence.
The Straits Times has reached out to PA for comment.
Last edited:
