• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Govt. Poor Income Re-Distribution?

VIBGYOR

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Oct 15, 2008
Messages
3,316
Points
0
Govt. did alot of things, but the GINI index is getting wider every year? Have they done something wrong? :D

Families to get $125m in utility rebates
780,000 households will benefit from help given to offset GST hike

By Jessica Lim

MORE than 780,000 HDB households will receive utility rebates in the next seven months, with those in smaller flats getting more.

The 2009 rebates will cost the Government $125 million. They were introduced during last year's Budget as part of the $4 billion GST offset package.

The aim of the rebates is to help Singaporeans, especially those from low-income households, cope with the GST hike implemented in July last year.

The Utilities-Save (U-Save) rebates range from $70 to $210 and are pegged to flat type. They will be parcelled out in two instalments - the first next month, and the second in July.

People living in one- or two-room flats, for example, will receive rebates of $210, while those living in five-room flats will receive $110.

Now in its third year, the rebates - which recipients can roll over to the following months if their bills are less than the rebate amount - will run until at least 2011. Over the five years from 2007 to 2011, $550 million will be handed out in total.

The rebate will help Madam Fauziah Ab Samad, a mother of five school-going children who lives in a four-room flat in Jurong West.

'This month, my children had to buy school books and new uniforms. This will really help to offset all these extra costs,' said the housewife, who lives on $1,300 a month from her husband who is a bus driver.

The family has $500 in unpaid power bills.

Mr William Sng, 61, who lives in a three-room flat in Hougang, is also grateful.

'If the Government wants to help me to pay my bills, I am happy,' said the father of two in Mandarin.

'It may not be that much, but the amount saved will cover the amount I spend for four trips to the supermarket.'

The rebate amount will be reflected in utility bills for January and July 2009 for all eligible households.

For more information on U-Save rebates, the public can call SP Services on 1800-2222-333.
 
The rebate will help Madam Fauziah Ab Samad, a mother of five school-going children who lives in a four-room flat in Jurong West.

'This month, my children had to buy school books and new uniforms. This will really help to offset all these extra costs,' said the housewife, who lives on $1,300 a month from her husband who is a bus driver.

The family has $500 in unpaid power bills.

1800-2222-333.

I wonder how does reducing the debt owed to SP help offset the children's expenditure since they cannot repay the arrears anyway.

$1300 per month for 2 adults and 5 children. Are these responsible adults?
 
Peasants: Why so little one ?

Gahmen : KNN .... don't give kena fucked by them !! Give, lagi fucked by them !!!:eek::eek:
 
Govt. did alot of things, but the GINI index is getting wider every year? Have they done something wrong? :D

Why should any income be redistributed in the first place?:confused:

Any system that takes my hard earned money and gives it to some useless, stupid, ignorant bunch of losers is slippery path towards welfare dependency.

Winners should allowed to retain all their wealth. Imagine the Olympic games where the gold medals are melted down and redistributed to athletes that came last and you'll realise the folly of the concept of "income redistribution".:rolleyes:
 
They don't need to re-distribute income.
They simply need to reduce theirs.
 
Excessive income redistribution is highway robbery albeit in suppsedl moral grounds. Some is necessary but should be kept to a bare minimum.

Govt. did alot of things, but the GINI index is getting wider every year? Have they done something wrong? :D
 
I wonder how does reducing the debt owed to SP help offset the children's expenditure since they cannot repay the arrears anyway.

$1300 per month for 2 adults and 5 children. Are these responsible adults?

They should not have had more than 1 kid. And somehow with their 5 children it becomes the governments' and society's fault.
 
I wonder how does reducing the debt owed to SP help offset the children's expenditure since they cannot repay the arrears anyway.

$1300 per month for 2 adults and 5 children. Are these responsible adults?

how come the pay is so low? why are they not getting developed countries pay?

even Ministars get better than developed countries pay?

YOU SINKIES KENA SCREWED!
 
Why should any income be redistributed in the first place?:confused:

the folly of no equitable income redistriibution brings discontents, and riots and later revolt by the peasants.

the cycle repeats itself again! :D
 
the folly of no equitable income redistriibution brings discontents, and riots and later revolt by the peasants.

the cycle repeats itself again! :D

If peasants revolt, they should be SHOT!
 
SHOT by who? YOU?

THE ARMY IS THE CITIZENS!

The Elite Palace Guard unit will do the job. They have been specifically trained to place a bullet between the eyes of sinkie losers.
 
I wonder how does reducing the debt owed to SP help offset the children's expenditure since they cannot repay the arrears anyway.

$1300 per month for 2 adults and 5 children. Are these responsible adults?

Reminder letters $0.50 + 1% per mth of the arrears are calculated into the total bills.

1% per mth = 12% per year.
 
Why should any income be redistributed in the first place?:confused:

Any system that takes my hard earned money and gives it to some useless, stupid, ignorant bunch of losers is slippery path towards welfare dependency.

Winners should allowed to retain all their wealth. Imagine the Olympic games where the gold medals are melted down and redistributed to athletes that came last and you'll realise the folly of the concept of "income redistribution".:rolleyes:

Who do you think you are! :oIo:

Singapore government is the highest paid government in the world! Singaporeans, trust the Singapore government, to make the correct decisions at all times. If something hapens, Singaporeans will take the blame. Who are you!!
 
Lets cut the crap about how many children one have to feed when a single elderly cannot get job to feed herself.

This could be your wife in the future. Golden period indeed.



my.php
[/URL] [/IMG]
 
Who do you think you are! :oIo:

Singapore government is the highest paid government in the world! Singaporeans, trust the Singapore government, to make the correct decisions at all times. If something hapens, Singaporeans will take the blame. Who are you!!

Who am I??:rolleyes: I'm the self appointed leader of a campaign designed to ensure that sinkie losers will NEVER get something for nothing! As my hero LKY put it very aptly.... "THERE IS NO FREE LUNCH!". If the poor want more money, they should WORK for it instead of helping themselves to handouts obtained by taxing the rich.

I want the govt to make the correct decisions too and income redistribution in any form is NOT a good policy for reasons I have clearly explained.

In fact, I am proposing that the poor be charged a higher rate of GST than the rich. This will give them an incentive to earn more money. Nothing like the proverbial kick in the pants to get those losers out of their complacency and change their mindsets!:D
 
Who am I??:rolleyes: I'm the self appointed leader of a campaign designed to ensure that sinkie losers will NEVER get something for nothing! As my hero LKY put it very aptly.... "THERE IS NO FREE LUNCH!". If the poor want more money, they should WORK for it instead of helping themselves to handouts obtained by taxing the rich.

I want the govt to make the correct decisions too and income redistribution in any form is NOT a good policy for reasons I have clearly explained.

In fact, I am proposing that the poor be charged a higher rate of GST than the rich. This will give them an incentive to earn more money. Nothing like the proverbial kick in the pants to get those losers out of their complacency and change their mindsets!:D

The Singapore government knows how to balance everything well. If they increase the GST for the poor, they know how to balance it! by reducing the income tax. The Singapore Government is doing a good job! Are you trying to suck! up to them?
 
Once governments start playing RobbinG Hood, they're no better than Neil Kinnock and should start earning UK Minister's wages. As long as they have the courage to reject welfare, they deserve the miserly $2 million we're paying them right now.

Who do you think you are! :oIo:

Singapore government is the highest paid government in the world! Singaporeans, trust the Singapore government, to make the correct decisions at all times. If something hapens, Singaporeans will take the blame. Who are you!!
 
As my hero LKY put it very aptly.... "THERE IS NO FREE LUNCH!". If the poor want more money, they should WORK for it instead of helping themselves to handouts obtained by taxing the rich.

The reason is very simple - there are more poor people than rich people. In a one man one vote society, the politicians will go for the poor to win more votes. The notion of "there is no free lunch" is only selectively applied - ask LKY why the people should vote for him - because he give out "free lunches" in different forms - eg HDB subsidies, GST rebates, Good Progress Report, free school books, etc.

Many of the people who did not vote for the PAP are from the middle of the road people - like you say - they are taxed more to give to the "poor" with their bunch of kids.

The poor are smart to use the kids as hostage to more government subsidy.
 
This tactic is typical of the reCHEEme of the MONGREL who bit his masters' hands LOUDHAILER chee soon juan.

First, raise the issue about this family. Then when they're losing the argument, switch the subject to something else and say something really general.



Lets cut the crap about how many children one have to feed when a single elderly cannot get job to feed herself.

This could be your wife in the future. Golden period indeed.



my.php
[/URL] [/IMG]
 
Back
Top