• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Government want Sinkies to be Male Mantis when their Corks charged Husbands Lape Case when piak wifey?

WangChuk

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Oct 19, 2024
Messages
1,034
Points
63
https://www.asiaone.com/singapore/s...erral&utm_campaign=A1+trending&utm_content=c1

singapore

Singapore to spend $7b on marriage and parenthood initiatives in FY2026​

Singapore to spend $7b on marriage and parenthood initiatives in FY2026

The $7 billion figure is over and above government subsidies in other areas such as education and housing.
PHOTO: The Straits Times file
PUBLISHED ON February 06, 2025 8:48 AMByChin Soo Fang

SINGAPORE - Nearly $7 billion will be spent on marriage and parenthood initiatives in financial year 2026, up from over $4 billion in 2020.

Minister in the Prime Minister’s Office Indranee Rajah cited this figure to show how much recent policy changes to the early childhood sector and to parental leave entitlements will add up to on an annual basis.

Speaking in Parliament on Feb 5, Ms Indranee said Singaporean families continued to be a top national priority, even as family formation and fertility rates fall here and around the world due to changing social norms. She noted that the $7 billion figure is over and above government subsidies in other areas such as education and housing.

“The decision to marry and have children is a deeply personal one, but we know from our surveys that the majority of Singaporeans aspire to get married and have children,” she said. “This is encouraging and gives hope for the future.”

In the last five years, the Government has made a series of “major shifts and bold moves” to address people’s concerns in order to make Singapore as conducive to marriage and parenthood as possible, she said.

These include significantly ramping up leave for parents with a new shared parental leave scheme, she noted. Announced at the 2024 National Day Rally (NDR), the 10 additional weeks of government-paid leave will cost $400 million a year once it is fully implemented in 2026.
https://www.asiaone.com/singapore/a...eeks-shared-parental-leave-national-day-rally
On housing, another major area of concern, she noted that this term of government started in the middle of the Covid-19 pandemic, which severely disrupted construction and caused a public housing crunch.

But working with the built environment sector, the Government has completed all Build-to-Order (BTO) projects delayed by Covid-19, and exceeded its commitment to launch 100,000 BTO flats from 2021 to 2025.

Ms Indranee said the authorities will continue to put out a steady pipeline of over 50,000 flats between 2025 and 2027 to meet housing demand, and will explore launching more flats with shorter waiting times in the coming years.

The minister also addressed proposals made by the more than 20 MPs who spoke during the six-hour debate, which resolved that the House call for continued review and updating of policies to better support families, and the marriage and parenthood aspirations of Singaporeans.

Many of the suggestions centred on additional housing and financial support to encourage parenthood, as well as on greater caregiving help.
https://www.sammyboy.com/"https://w...UN/?utm_source=ig_embed&utm_campaign=loading"
Ms Indranee noted that housing subsidies and grants had recently been enhanced for first-time buyers. These include the Enhanced CPF Housing Grant (EHG), the CPF Housing Grant for Resale Flats, and the Proximity Housing Grant.

The increased EHG from August 2024 means a first-time married couple can benefit from grants of up to $120,000 for BTO flats and up to $230,000 for resale flats, she said.


She also acknowledged concerns about the resale market, such as cash-over-valuation (COV) amounts for some resale transactions.

While this was driven by strong demand and some temporary tightness in the supply of new flats that entered the resale market, she said most resale flat buyers do not pay any COV.

It will take time for the several rounds of cooling measures that have been put in place to work their way through the market, she said.

On financial support, she noted that from April 1, the MediSave Grant for Newborns will be increased from $4,000 to $5,000. Taken together with the Baby Bonus Scheme, parents receive up to $25,000 for their first child, and up to $38,000 for subsequent children.

A new scheme to help large families, first mentioned at NDR 2024, will also be announced at the upcoming Budget on Feb 18, she added.

During the debate, Progress Singapore Party (PSP) Non-Constituency MP Leong Mun Wai proposed that the motion be amended to instead urge the Government to reimagine policies to better support Singaporeans’ marriage and parenthood aspirations.

But this was rejected by Ms Indranee, who called the amendment “a step back”.

She noted that opposition MPs had sought to portray marriage and parenthood policies here as incremental and not bold enough, even though Singapore had begun its reimagination process back in June 2022, when then Deputy Prime Minister Lawrence Wong launched the Forward Singapore exercise.

That was how the Government knew that housing, costs of raising children, competitive stress, and time – to balance work and family responsibilities – were the key concerns, she said.

As a result, major moves were made, such as the HDB new classification framework that led to increased subsidies for Plus and Prime flats so that flats in more desirable locations are more affordable, said Ms Indranee.

Other major moves were to ramp up infant care capacity three-fold in the last decade, and removing the PSLE T-score and broadening post-secondary pathways, she added.

“The boat called ‘Reimagination’ has already left the port and is sailing... To ask us in this amendment to start reimagination is kind of like a step back,” she said.

The PSP’s amendment was also tied to its proposed Affordable Homes Scheme first raised in 2023. Ms Indranee reiterated that this would turn Singaporeans from home owners to tenants and would be a raid on the reserves.

Mr Leong disagreed that the PSP’s scheme would be a raid on the reserves. He also asked why the Government did not commit to a total fertility rate (TFR) target to hit, to show that it was making an effort to reverse the slide in TFR.

Ms Indranee countered that having children is a personal decision that cannot be brought about just by setting a target.

“It’s up to parents to decide if they want to have children, and what we can and are doing is trying to make it as facilitative and as comfortable as possible for them to do so.”
 
Maybe spend some of this $7b on building bigger bedrooms for them to fuck properly ?
 
I've said time and again that thowing money like this will not solve the fertility problem. :wink:

But if you want to tell the voters that you are doing something about it, and some of that money can be fed to your cronies, then that's good for you. :cool:

Enjoy your slow but inevitable demographic and economic suicide. :sneaky:
 
https://www.asiaone.com/singapore/s...erral&utm_campaign=A1+trending&utm_content=c1

singapore

Singapore to spend $7b on marriage and parenthood initiatives in FY2026​

Singapore to spend $7b on marriage and parenthood initiatives in FY2026

The $7 billion figure is over and above government subsidies in other areas such as education and housing.
PHOTO: The Straits Times file
PUBLISHED ON February 06, 2025 8:48 AMByChin Soo Fang

SINGAPORE - Nearly $7 billion will be spent on marriage and parenthood initiatives in financial year 2026, up from over $4 billion in 2020.

Minister in the Prime Minister’s Office Indranee Rajah cited this figure to show how much recent policy changes to the early childhood sector and to parental leave entitlements will add up to on an annual basis.

Speaking in Parliament on Feb 5, Ms Indranee said Singaporean families continued to be a top national priority, even as family formation and fertility rates fall here and around the world due to changing social norms. She noted that the $7 billion figure is over and above government subsidies in other areas such as education and housing.

“The decision to marry and have children is a deeply personal one, but we know from our surveys that the majority of Singaporeans aspire to get married and have children,” she said. “This is encouraging and gives hope for the future.”

In the last five years, the Government has made a series of “major shifts and bold moves” to address people’s concerns in order to make Singapore as conducive to marriage and parenthood as possible, she said.

These include significantly ramping up leave for parents with a new shared parental leave scheme, she noted. Announced at the 2024 National Day Rally (NDR), the 10 additional weeks of government-paid leave will cost $400 million a year once it is fully implemented in 2026.
https://www.asiaone.com/singapore/a...eeks-shared-parental-leave-national-day-rally
On housing, another major area of concern, she noted that this term of government started in the middle of the Covid-19 pandemic, which severely disrupted construction and caused a public housing crunch.

But working with the built environment sector, the Government has completed all Build-to-Order (BTO) projects delayed by Covid-19, and exceeded its commitment to launch 100,000 BTO flats from 2021 to 2025.

Ms Indranee said the authorities will continue to put out a steady pipeline of over 50,000 flats between 2025 and 2027 to meet housing demand, and will explore launching more flats with shorter waiting times in the coming years.

The minister also addressed proposals made by the more than 20 MPs who spoke during the six-hour debate, which resolved that the House call for continued review and updating of policies to better support families, and the marriage and parenthood aspirations of Singaporeans.

Many of the suggestions centred on additional housing and financial support to encourage parenthood, as well as on greater caregiving help.
https://www.sammyboy.com/"https://w...UN/?utm_source=ig_embed&utm_campaign=loading"
Ms Indranee noted that housing subsidies and grants had recently been enhanced for first-time buyers. These include the Enhanced CPF Housing Grant (EHG), the CPF Housing Grant for Resale Flats, and the Proximity Housing Grant.

The increased EHG from August 2024 means a first-time married couple can benefit from grants of up to $120,000 for BTO flats and up to $230,000 for resale flats, she said.


She also acknowledged concerns about the resale market, such as cash-over-valuation (COV) amounts for some resale transactions.

While this was driven by strong demand and some temporary tightness in the supply of new flats that entered the resale market, she said most resale flat buyers do not pay any COV.

It will take time for the several rounds of cooling measures that have been put in place to work their way through the market, she said.

On financial support, she noted that from April 1, the MediSave Grant for Newborns will be increased from $4,000 to $5,000. Taken together with the Baby Bonus Scheme, parents receive up to $25,000 for their first child, and up to $38,000 for subsequent children.

A new scheme to help large families, first mentioned at NDR 2024, will also be announced at the upcoming Budget on Feb 18, she added.

During the debate, Progress Singapore Party (PSP) Non-Constituency MP Leong Mun Wai proposed that the motion be amended to instead urge the Government to reimagine policies to better support Singaporeans’ marriage and parenthood aspirations.

But this was rejected by Ms Indranee, who called the amendment “a step back”.

She noted that opposition MPs had sought to portray marriage and parenthood policies here as incremental and not bold enough, even though Singapore had begun its reimagination process back in June 2022, when then Deputy Prime Minister Lawrence Wong launched the Forward Singapore exercise.

That was how the Government knew that housing, costs of raising children, competitive stress, and time – to balance work and family responsibilities – were the key concerns, she said.

As a result, major moves were made, such as the HDB new classification framework that led to increased subsidies for Plus and Prime flats so that flats in more desirable locations are more affordable, said Ms Indranee.

Other major moves were to ramp up infant care capacity three-fold in the last decade, and removing the PSLE T-score and broadening post-secondary pathways, she added.

“The boat called ‘Reimagination’ has already left the port and is sailing... To ask us in this amendment to start reimagination is kind of like a step back,” she said.

The PSP’s amendment was also tied to its proposed Affordable Homes Scheme first raised in 2023. Ms Indranee reiterated that this would turn Singaporeans from home owners to tenants and would be a raid on the reserves.

Mr Leong disagreed that the PSP’s scheme would be a raid on the reserves. He also asked why the Government did not commit to a total fertility rate (TFR) target to hit, to show that it was making an effort to reverse the slide in TFR.

Ms Indranee countered that having children is a personal decision that cannot be brought about just by setting a target.

“It’s up to parents to decide if they want to have children, and what we can and are doing is trying to make it as facilitative and as comfortable as possible for them to do so.”
They are still clueless why young couples do not want marriage and having children.
They just refused to understand first the price of pathetic tiny BTO flat is so bloody expensive, it costs $400K-$700K for 3 to 4 rm flat. Second, the cost of raising children and education take up an average couple of a big fraction of their salary. Thirdly, COE is so bloody high and very time-consuming and inconvenient to fetch their children without a car, especially a working couple. Lastly, too much maternity and paternity leave would put their jobs at risk, employers may replace them by employing CECA Indians instead.
Basically, The present policy is not conducive enough for young couples to marry and produce babies. It is half-baked policy and good only for financially well-off couples. In summary the new policy will not work and surely fail to improve the marriage and fertility rate.
You might as well giving this $7b to foreigner CECA couple with children willing to become citizens, as what you are doing now.
 
Last edited:
They are still clueless why young couples do not want marriage and having children.
They just refused to understand furst the price of pathetic tiny BTO flat is so bloody expensive, it costs $400K-$700K for 3 to 4 rm flat. Second The cost of raising children and education take up an average couple a big fraction of their salary. Thirdly, COE is so bloody high and very time consuming and inconvenient to fetch their children without a car, especially a working couple. Too much maternity and paternity leave would put their jobs at risk, employers may replace them by employing CECA Indians instead.
The present policy is not conducive enough for young couples to marry and produce babies. It is half baked policy and good only for financially well off couples.

It's not just the financial stuff. Raising children in Sinkieland now is tantamount to child abuse. All the bullshit they are imposing on your kid these days, it's unbelievable. :cool:
 
I've said time and again that thowing money like this will not solve the fertility problem. :wink:

But if you want to tell the voters that you are doing something about it, and some of that money can be fed to your cronies, then that's good for you. :cool:

Enjoy your slow but inevitable demographic and economic suicide. :sneaky:
they are not throwing money. It is just justifying a fat budget so that they justify the high taxes. end of day, some money will probably go to some "black" budget and the balance not spent will result in a budget surplus to justify their "exceptional" ability to build reserves.

work in any TLC senior management and you will see this in their annual budget process.

They need to challenge themselves to run the country with a small budget deficit with a KPI to return a balanced budget or surplus
 
Non Muslims in Singapore are idiots if they get married in this day and age.
Fucks are free and you don't have to risk your assets or risk jail time
 
On financial support, she noted that from April 1, the MediSave Grant for Newborns will be increased from $4,000 to $5,000. Taken together with the Baby Bonus Scheme, parents receive up to $25,000 for their first child, and up to $38,000 for subsequent children
Malays should take this challenge since Chinese are hopeless fks.
Use the money to buy proper homes in JB. Get children proper jiu hu education. And buy proper jiu hu cars.
 
S$7,000,000,000? for this nonsense......
are you fucking kidding me? is this gonna come from cheebye loong's asshole before he dies?
 
Back
Top