• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Google convicted of defaming French user 'by linking his name to rape in searches'

D

Diao Chan

Guest

Google convicted of defaming French user 'by linking his name to rape in searches'


Google has been convicted of defaming a French computer user after the Internet technology giant linked his name to the word “rapist” in automatic web searches.

By Andrew Hough
Published: 3:45PM BST 27 Sep 2010


GOOGLE_1539841c.jpg


Google said it would appeal the decision. "Google does not suggest these terms," a spokeswoman said. Photo: GETTY IMAGES

The convicted sex offender, who cannot be named for legal reasons, was found to have been defamed by the search engine’s “suggest” function. Court documents said the function, which suggests options and phrases as a user types, linked the man’s identity to words including "rapist", "satanist", "rape," and "prison".

According to French reports, the man was convicted of the “corruption of a minor” and sentenced to three years in jail earlier this year. Despite appealing his conviction, the man discovered his name was linked by the search function to the phrases. But in what is believed to be a landmark decision, the Superior Court of Paris found Google guilty of the "public slandering of a private individual". Google said it will appeal the decision, which also named Eric Schmidt, its chief executive.

The court ruled the man had been defamed because he is considered innocent under French law until all of his appeals have been exhausted. The American company, based in Mountain View, California, was ordered to pay damages to the man after he sued for libel. In its decision, handed down earlier this month, the court also ordered the company to remove the "harmful" suggestions from the search and adopt measures to prevent it from reoccurring.

The ruling confirmed the search function was not illegal. While the court awarded “symbolic” damages of one euro, it ordered the company pay 5,000 euros (£4254) in costs. The court also said the search engine had not showed good faith in the matter. A Google spokeswoman said the company would appeal the French court decision.

She said the “Google Suggest” function reflected the most common terms used in the past with words entered and were not being suggested by the company. "These searches are algorithmically determined based on a number of purely objective factors including (the) popularity of search terms,” she said. “Google does not suggest these terms. All of the queries shown in Autocomplete have been typed previously by other Google users.”

The decision comes as Google fights a series of lawsuits worldwide, including several copyright disputes in other European countries involving its YouTube service. The company is currently appealing against the conviction of three employees who were found guilty of violating Italian privacy laws. A trial was told the trio posted footage on Google Video that showed a Down's syndrome teenager being bullied by four other boys at a school in Turin.

It has also been embroiled in an international privacy row involving its Street View mapping service. In an interview last month Mr Schmidt, 55, predicted that in the future, Google will know so much about its users that the search engine will be able to help them plan their lives. The company spokeswoman declined to say how many lawsuits the company was facing worldwide.


 
Top