• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chitchat Good Minister Heng Asks Oppie Sylvia To Apologize For Defaming Good PAP Gahmen! Apologize, U Bitch!

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Joined
Oct 30, 2014
Messages
36,768
Points
113
wl_2d_030218.jpg


SINGAPORE - Finance Minister Heng Swee Keat has asked Workers' Party chairman Sylvia Lim if she would apologise, and withdraw her allegation that the Government deferred the goods and services tax (GST) hike because it was trapped by earlier statements it made about having enough funds.

He said the Government had consistently said it has enough money for its current term of office, but would need to raise revenue beyond that to pay for increased spending, especially on healthcare.

In a statement issued on Friday (Mar 02), he said: "Now that Ms Lim has had an opportunity to check the record, will she withdraw her allegation, as an honourable MP should, and apologise to the House? Or does she still hold she has carte blanche to raise any and every suspicion, rumour or falsehood in Parliament, and continue to insist on them regardless of the facts?"

The Straits Times has contacted Ms Lim for comments.

Ms Lim's claims during the Budget debate on Thursday sparked a heated exchange between her and Home Affairs and Law Minister K. Shanmugam.

This was after she said it was her suspicion that in the run up to the Budget debate, "there were some test balloons being floated out about the fact that the Government needs to raise revenue".

She added:"The public seized on the fact that DPM Tharman and perhaps other leaders had earlier said that the Government has enough money for the decade. So the public pointed out that 'Hey, you know, is this a contradiction?'

"I rather suspect myself that the Government is stuck with that announcement. Otherwise, you know, if their announcement had not been made, perhaps we would be debating a GST hike today," she said in Parliament.

She was referring to a statement by Deputy Prime Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam who said in 2015 when he was Finance Minister that the revenue measures the Government had already undertaken would provide sufficiently for increased spending planned until the end of the decade.

Rebutting Ms Lim on Thursday, Mr Shanmugam set out the timeline of comments from government leaders on the need to increase taxes, to show they had been consistent on the matter. As early as 2013, they flagged the need to raise taxes in the future, even though there was no need for more revenue in the current term of government.

Mr Heng took up this point in his statement. He said that Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong mentioned the need for a tax increase during the National Day Rally in 2013.

After this Mr Heng himself spoke of the likelihood of atax increase at the 2017 Budget debate and a constituency event a few months later.

Then last November, PM Lee reiterated the need for taxes to rise.

Said Mr Heng: "Taking all these statements together, two things are clear: One, that there is no need to raise taxes for the current term. But two, there is a need to raise taxes for the future. There were no test balloons."

He added that Ms Lim was "in effect accusing the Government of being untruthful when it says that it had planned ahead, and that its proposal to raise the GST between 2021 and 2025 was the result of such planning".

Noting that Ms Lim had said in Parliament that her statement was based on "suspicion", Mr Heng said the facts on the issue were public.

The Ministry of Finance had set out the facts in a letter to The Straits Times' Forum Page on Feb 28, he said, adding he and Mr Shanmugam had also now done so.

Said Mr Heng: "The Government had consistently said it has enough money for its current term of office, but beyond that, it needed to provide for increased expenditure, especially on healthcare, with increased taxes."

He said MPs were "entitled to raise suspicions in Parliament, if they honestly believed them, but honest belief requires factual basis".

"And when clear factual replies have been given, an honourable MP should either refute them with further facts, or acknowledge them and withdraw their allegations, especially if the allegations had insinuated lack of candour or wrongdoing on the part of the Government."

He also pointed out that WP chief Low Thia Khiang asked the Government to be upfront with Singaporeans if it was planning a GST hike.

During the 2017 debate on the spending plans of ministries, Mr Low had said: "If the minister is indeed considering an increase in GST before the end of the decade, I hope he can be upfront with Singaporeans now so that they are not blindsided by the Government as they were with the sudden 30 per cent increase in water price".

Referring to Mr Low's remarks, Mr Heng said: "This is precisely what the Government has now done by announcing the forthcoming GST increase early."

Mr Heng said in his Feb 19 Budget statement that GST would go up by 2 percentage points to 9 per cent some time between 2021 and 2025. WP MPs voted against the Budget on Thursday, saying they did so solely because they could not support the GST increase.

http://www.straitstimes.com/politic...ll-withdraw-allegation-against-govt-on-timing
 
Funny that when pap MPs sprout shit like hara Kiri, use parliamentary time to talk about pinky family dispute. Etc...it's is ok..now when ST highlights a fact...the pap ask her to apologize,? A bit of a joke ain't it?
 
For 53 yrs we have seen and heard the same old shit that being dish in Parleement. Why bother if 70% luv em.
 
Parliament has its parliamentary privileges...if you cannot stand the debate, leave the house.
 
my uncle say you all ter nao mps jiak liao bee never debate on self inflicted sinkie losers traits to prevent or fine sinkies for inflicting sinkieland with your ter nao traits.
 
All I can say is that Heng is an MC King.....
 
my uncle say you all ter nao mps jiak liao bee never debate on self inflicted sinkie losers traits to prevent or fine sinkies for inflicting sinkieland with your ter nao traits.
my uncle say he recommend good garmen to punish self inflicted sinkie losers by :
1. ban them from studying pte uni if take loan
2. those borrow money not allowed to have luxury else jail sentence.
and many more.
 
Guilty people get defensive, innocent people go on the offensive.....
 
Guilty people get defensive, innocent people go on the offensive.....
PAP already know WP's lack of ambition liao lah. They know WP don't dare to be government, only want to be co-driver, check check here check check there, no ambition at all.

If WP don't have the ambition to form the next government, then they deserve to be treated like an irritating sideshow by Shan. If WP have the ambition to form the next government, they will take the government to task, not just poke poke her poke poke there pretend to be doing some work for the 30%.

Voted into Parliament so long liao never hear WP question issues on CPF and Temasek.
 
Even PAP ministers think that WP MPs are not playing the role of opposition in Parliament well.

Looks like Shan is WP's co-driver, checking on WP.

If only WP can check on PAP like Shan and Heng checking on Sylvia and Pritam, WP will be a strong opposition.
 
Back
Top