• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

GIC wants to buy Japanese hotel chain: WSJ

Watchman

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Mar 12, 2009
Messages
13,160
Points
0
GIC wants to buy Japanese hotel chain: WSJ
Wednesday, February 17, 2010

The Government of Singapore Investment Corporation (GIC) wants to take over the Japanese ANA hotel chain, which it earlier helped Morgan Stanley to buy, and is discussing terms with other lenders, reports the Wall Street Journal.

Morgan Stanley may have to hand over the keys to the $2.4 billion hotel chain when the debt falls due in April, says the report.

Citigroup and Japan's Shinsei Bank, the two main creditors, are pushing Morgan Stanley to put more equity in the hotel chain, which includes the ANA Intercontinental in Tokyo, to give the depressed holdings more security.

But Morgan Stanley has hesitated because Japanese property values have fallen since it completed the acquisition of 13 hotels and two property-management units from All Nippon Airways for 281.3 billion yen, or $2.4 billion at the time, in June 2007. It was then the biggest hotel transaction in Asia, says Reuters.

Citigroup and Shinsei lent Morgan about 180 billion yen in senior debt to make the purchase, says the Journal.

GIC, the third creditor, provided mezzanine financing, a mix of debt and equity, which is next in line to get wiped out after Morgan Stanley's equity if the Singapore fund doesn't do something to protect its stake, it adds.

GIC booked losses on its $675 million investment in Stuyvesant Town/Peter Cooper Village complex, an apartment complex in Manhattan, New York, in which also it held a mix of debt and equity.

That's small potatoes, however, compared with its multibillion-dollar UBS losses.

GIC will be hit with a paper loss of about 7.85 billion Swiss francs (around $7.26 billion), converting notes into shares that would give it a 6.6 per cent stake in UBS, making it the biggest shareholder of the Swiss bank, according to the Straits Times.

GIC invested 11 billion Swiss francs in UBS, but now its UBS shares are worth just 3.15 billion Swiss francs, says the newspaper.
Meanwhile, Temasek Holdings has cut its stake in India's No.2 lender ICICI Bank to 5.9 percent from 8.3 percent, reports Reuters.

GIC's strategy could be different from that of Temasek, which has been more cautious since the financial crisis and has done very few blockbuster deals, says another Reuters report. Temasek, the smaller of the two Singapore sovereign wealth funds, has largely bought small stakes in Chinese firms, IPOs or has supported its portfolio companies, it adds.

GIC's recent investments have been diverse, ranging from the hotel industry and China property developer Longfor to a videogaming firm, says Reuters
.

Subscribe to this feed • Email this
 
Is this the same Lau CB who claimed that Sporns would become destitutes w/o foreigners? Yet he could have so much spare cash to gamble in Japan?
 
The Morgan Stanley relationship is getting incestuous. The old man sits on its advisory board. They have been sending scholars for internship, they have been recruiting from Morgan Stanley, they have asked Morgan Stanley to provide internships in New York for their kids and the list goes on.

Morgan Stanley has been their merchant bankers for some many deals including the disasterous Thaksin deal. But its the first time the role has been reversed - GIC financing a merchant bank to acquire companies.

Looks like Morgan Stanlely put him on the board to get acess to GIC rather than actually seeking his advice.
 
LKY is an astute politician yes, in way he "fixed" and survived his political opponents, but IMHO, he's not an investment guru.

GIC's and Temasek's consistent string of huge losses cannot be attributed to external factors all the time. And Singaporeans must demand accountability before Singapore gets bankrupted by the PAP.
 
Back
Top