Isn't incest permitted in Islam? The prophet married his closed cousin.
Incest is strictly prohibited in Islam. You were thinking about your own religion of Hinduism. As elaborated by your coreligionists.
Besides being a child-molester, `holy' Rama was also guilty of incest, For Sita is referred to in the oldest surviving Ramayanas as his own sister.
In the Dasarathajataka Sita is represented as the sister as well as the wife of Rama, Son of Dasaratha of the Ikshvaku line. " [ Chandra, P. 156 ]
So we see that hari and his mom were only practising a religious hindu ritual, Not knocking boots. What a disgusting religion.
This is confirmed by anthropological research showing that incest was institutionalised in Rama's race, The Ikshvaku dynasty of Aryan Kshatriyas.
The term Devadasi originally described a Hindu religious practice in which girls were "married" to a deity.
This practice has been corrupted over the ages. The initiation process and so called coming-of-age rites for girls are used by the temple priests to have sex with 12-13 year old girls. All this is done willingly, Under the cover of "religion".The basic fact is if you want to go and dedicate your life to God then it is your choice. The key word here is choice. Can a 9 - 12 year old girl choose this? Or is it just something that she is forced to do?
Krishna's Incest with His Sister
Deepti Naidu
Krishna is worshipped as the supreme god by many followers of the Aryan Vaishnava religion. This eminent personality had 16, 000 wives and many affairs with the cow-herdesses (gopis), Who were the wives of other men. The worst aspect of this supposed `god', However, Is that `Lord' Krishna lived in incest with his sister Subhadra! Not only that, He shared her with his brother Balarama [ Mah. Wh. 153 ]. So one big family of incest! The Mahabharat clearly mentions this in its oldest extant versions.
Thus, "In the festivals of that God [ Jagannath ], The 3 images of Krishna, His brother Balarama, And his sister Subhadra, Are brought prominently forward; and the populace do not fail to heap reproaches upon Krishna, And upon his sister likewise, For having indulged in a criminal intimacy. " -- [ Mah. Wh 153 ]
Despite the fact that the bigoted Vaishnavas have tried to erase this stain from the later versions of the Mahabharata, The older versions clearly state the facts and expose Krishna's dirty linen for all to see.
Krishna's Incest with His Sister
by Deepti Naidu
Krishna is worshipped as the supreme god by many followers of the Aryan
Vaishnava religion. This eminent personality had
16,000 wives and many affairs with the cow-herdesses (gopis), who were the
wives of other men. The worst aspect of this
supposed `god', however, is that `Lord' Krishna lived in incest with his
sister Subhadra ! Not only that, he shared her with his
brother Balarama [ Mah.wh.153 ]. So one big family of incest ! The
Mahabharat clearly mentions this in its oldest extant
versions. Thus,
"In the festivals of that God [ Jagannath ], the 3 images of Krishna,
his brother Balarama, and his sister Subhadra,
are brought prominently forward; and the populace do not fail to heap
reproaches upon Krishna, and upon his
sister likewise, for having indulged in a criminal intimacy."
-- [ Mah.wh 153 ]
Despite the fact that the bigoted Vaishnavas have tried to erase this
stain from the later versions of the Mahabharata, the
older versions clearly state the facts and expose Krishna's dirty linen
for all to see.
" In the older tradition, Subhadra is said to have lived in criminal
intimacy with both her brothers. This tradition is
universally known and believed by the people in spite of the story of
the marriage of Subhadra [ to Arjun ]; and the
Mussalmans frequently taunt the Hindus with the fact. The Pundits
reconcile the stories by a fiction of there having
been two Subhadras. As to Krishna's proceedings, they are expalined
away as Maya, or delusion."
-- [ Mah.wh.153 ]
Remember, it is Krishna the Killer who was the cause of the Mahabharata
War. It is also Krishna who advised his warriors to
use cowardly and shady tricks like striking below the belt and attacking
opponents from behind during the Mahabharata War
! As a `divine punishment' for his cruelties and mass rape of 16,000
Indigenous Sudra women, he was killed by an archer,
his city (or village - how could barbaric Aryan Krishna even think of
living in a city ?) of Dwaraka was flooded, and his wives
all forced into prostitution. A just punishment indeed for Killer Krishna
!
The Brahmans always profess to be very strict in morality, so how does one
explain the discreapancy between their
supposed brahmacharya and their debauched gods ? The answer is that the
Aryans were highly primitive barbarians. They
introduced such uncouth practices as human sacrifice (`purushamedha'
sanctioned by the Vedas), horse sacrifice
(`ashwamedha'), widow-burning (`sati') and incest into India. The morality
of the ancient Aryans was very strict, being
another aspect of their lack of regard for human life. Thus, Manu
prescribes death for even talking to a married woman. This
was not limited to the Indo-Aryans, the German Aryan warrior would
instantly slay his erring wife and her paramour at the
slightest suspicion. As a result of such a strict and unnatural moral
code, which was even more severe than the Christian
one, a number of perversions arose, such as incest and beastiality. Incest
was very common in Vedic and Brahmanic society
as a method of releasing the suppressed urges, Indeed, the Vedas sanction
incest and allow it as a perfectly legitimate way
of gratification -
Brahma performed incest with his dauther [ Rig Veda III.31.1-2 ]. The
Vedas justify incest, and this fact was used by
Brahma to convince his daughter. When this was discovered, Prajapati
(Brahma) was pierced by Agni as a punishment
[ Sat.Br. XIII.9 ] [ Apte 63 ]. Brahma also, out of frustration,
copulated with a bear. This shows that the laws of morality
were very strict, and hence led to perversions in Hinduism.
In the Vedas the hero Pushan is the lover of his sister [ Rg Ved
VI.55.4 ] [ Apte 11 ]
The Vedic god Agni himself, who pierced Brahma for his incest with his
daughter, is also the lover of his own sister [ Rg
Ved X.3.3 ] [ Apte 11 ]. This shows that the strict moral code was
meant merely as a facade for the public. Like some
Victorians in private, the Vedic Aryans engaged in serious
perversions.
The Vedic Ashvins are referred to as the sons of Savitar and Ushas who
are brother and sister [ Apte 11 ].
The Ashvisns married Surya and Savitri who is their sister [ RgV
I.116.19 ].
The Vedic fire-god Agni is the son of his father and his sister [ Rg
Ved.I.91.7 ]
The Vedic god of the underworld Yama wards off his sister Yami, saying
marriage between brother and sister is
forbidden [ Rg.V.X.10 ] [ Apte 11 ]
The Kinsey survey of the USA revealed that beastiality and incest were
common in regions where persons did not have the
opportunity for healthy interaction with the opposite gender, and hence
had to relieve their pent-up urges in perverted
fashions. This was also the case for the Vedic Aryans and Victorian
England. Surveys show that incest is still widespread
amongst Aryan Vaishnavas today, as a result of the fanatic Vaishnava
repression of such desires (a la Gandhi).
In addition, the child marriage of brother and sister, and in fact between
any close relations, was encoouraged by the
Brahmans in order to destroy the genetic stock of non-Brahman races, since
children born of such consanginous unions are
likely to display genetic degradation. In this manner the Brahmin Aryans
are away at the genetic heritage of the
non-Brahmins. The ghastly custom was enforced in South India (where all
the non-Brahmins are Dravidian) as well as in
North India (where only the Dalits and Adivasis are Dravidoid) on Aryan
and Dravidians alike.
References
[ Apte ] = `The Sacrament of Marriage in Hindu Society' , U.M.Apte, Ajanta
Publishers 1978 Delhi
[ Mah.wh ] = `India of the Vedic Age with reference to the Mahabharata',
J.Talboys Wheeler, reprint 1973, Cosmo Publications, Delhi
[ Rg Ved ] = Rig Veda
