• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

GE2011 hot on the Internet, 52.8% positive on PAP...

Within Sammyboy.com, what percentage of the postings is PAP positive?


  • Total voters
    25

sense

Alfrescian
Loyal
The Straits Times said:
GE2011 hot on the Internet

By Chua Hian Hou
POLITICAL buzz online has spiked sharply in April ahead of the coming polls, with the bulk of the discussion centred on the People's Action Party (PAP), its candidates and its policies.
According to statistics from online monitoring company Brandtology and interactive media firm Tribal DDB, there were 44,000 blog postings, Tweets, and Facebook updates related to the General Election for the first 26 days of April - the day before Nomination Day.
This compares to just 27,000 for the entire month of March.
To compile its data, the two companies run online searches search for keywords related to the 2011 General Election, and assign a score to these words. Brandtology analysts also go through the data to try and pick up sarcasm, which might throw off the software engine.
Unsurprisingly, much of this chatter - 28,600 items or 66 per cent of all the postings for the month of April ? is PAP-related. Of these, 52.8 per cent were rated as positive or very positive, and 25.4 per cent rated either negative or very negative.
By comparison, the Worker's Party (WP) generated much less buzz: just 6,200 comments. Of these, 61.1 per cent were rated positive or very positive, and 16.9 per cent negative or worse.
Of Singapore's seven parties, online users appeared to like Mr Chiam See Tong?s Singapore People's Party best. While there were only 940 comments about his party, 74.8 per cent of these gave the party the thumbs-up, and only 12 per cent the thumbs-down.
One significant statistic is how well the controversial Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), led by Dr Chee Soo Juan, is doing online. It was the worst performing opposition party at the last election in 2006.
With 69.3 per cent of the 3,600 comments rated positive versus 19.8 per cent negative, it is better loved online than the bigger, more established WP.
The change, said an SDP spokesman, was likely a combination of the attractiveness of the party's vision, as well as its compelling, creative use of new media to woo younger, Internet-savvy Singaporeans.
For instance, its campaign video on video-sharing site Youtube, launched just a day ago, has already been viewed more than 20,000 times.
PAP candidate Lim Biow Chuan, who is contesting in the Mountbatten Single Member Constituency, said he was not surprised by the PAP's numbers.
While he is concerned about such sentiments, the nature of the medium makes it 'impossible to say whether it was representative of ground sentiment or of just a segment of the population'.
Brandtology and Tribal DDB concede as much, noting that their statistics 'are only an approximation of the sentiments being expressed'.
'As such it should not be taken as definitive or conclusive.'
Other reasons for the ruling party's performance, said Nanyang Technological University's Assistant Professor Marko Skoric, is that as the incumbent, it is 'an easy target' for criticism.
In any case, he said, the parties' online placing may not correlate to their performance in the polls.
'People might say bad things about the PAP and still vote for it,' he noted.
SDP's spokesman too, while optimistic that the party's success online would bode well for it performance this election, recognised this point, noting how British singer Susan Boyle's stunning online popularity failed to translate into commercial success.
This, he said, was 'testament of the difference between online sentiment and actual actions on the ground ?That's the reality of it'.

In summary, Brandtology & Tribal DDB sources are
  1. 44,000 blog postings,
  2. Tweets, and
  3. Facebook updates.

Their findings are (1) Party, (2) Item frequency, and (3) Rating in percentage, the no. of positive or very positive feedback:
  • PAP, 28,600 items, 52.8% +ve
  • WP, 6,200 items, 61.1% +ve
  • SPP, 940 items, 74.8% +ve
  • SDP, 3,600 items, 69.3% +ve

One thing is very certain, if they include Sammyboy.com as their 4th source, PAP +ve ratings would be shockingly low, to say the least.

I would strongly suggest that Brandtology and/or Tribal DDB include Sammyboy.com as a source for their ongoing project, then again, perhaps this forum is deliberately excluded as per request of their client(s)?

Hint: JamiQ, you may want to use this opportunity to do a self-sponsored project to focus on Sammyboy.com alone. Am very sure this project will give you huge marketing mileage over your SG competitor(s). Think about it, for the sake of your current and/or future investors. In the meantime, let's do an informal poll to see what Sammyboy.com forumers thinks about PAP.
 
Last edited:

talkincock

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
In summary

9802142b33db475be1e1639e8d4ce49aaab8ddc.gif
 
D

Darth Maul

Guest
52.8% positive on PAP..

According to who??? Oh your prostitute press of course! :eek::biggrin:



<iframe width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/goJiubcOvKE?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>​
 
Last edited by a moderator:

sense

Alfrescian
Loyal
image.php
Sam,

Could you help me check what is the total no. of postings within "Election Fever at the Coffee Shop"?

My rough approximation is 133,215* items, which is larger than the total no. of items from Brandtology & Tribal DDB 3 sources, ie. 39,340 items.

* As of 29Apr11, 12:09am, there are 535 posting in page 1, and there are 249 pages, therefore, the calculation here is 535postings*249 pages = 133,215 postings. If anybody else has a better way to estimate the total no. of postings, feel free to contribute.
 
Last edited:

talkincock

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
http://www.sammyboy.com/showthread.php?90708-Sammyboy-is-a-Pseudo-PAP-Forum


Notice how pro PAPpies come out to play here near the GE?

If you guys want to read the real news go to the oppositio websites.

http://yoursdp.org/
http://www.facebook.com/yoursdp

http://wp.sg/wpge/

http://thereformparty.net/

http://www.facebook.com/nspsg
http://www.facebook.com/nspsg

http://www.spp.org.sg/

www.temasekreview.com

http://theonlinecitizen.com/

Here in Sammyboy you just get asswipe news about how bad Opposition are but nothing about PAPpies blunders.

Get out of here fast!
 
D

Darth Maul

Guest
http://www.sammyboy.com/showthread.php?90708-Sammyboy-is-a-Pseudo-PAP-Forum


Notice how pro PAPpies come out to play here near the GE?

If you guys want to read the real news go to the opposition websites.

http://yoursdp.org/
http://www.facebook.com/yoursdp

http://wp.sg/wpge/

http://thereformparty.net/

http://www.facebook.com/nspsg
http://www.facebook.com/nspsg

http://www.spp.org.sg/

www.temasekreview.com

http://theonlinecitizen.com/

Here in Sammyboy you just get asswipe news about how bad Opposition are but nothing about PAPpies blunders.

Get out of here fast!
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
Could you help me check what is the total no. of postings within "Election Fever at the Coffee Shop"?

My rough approximation is 133,215* items,

What's with all this "approximation" crap. Why don't you just look at what the database tells you?:rolleyes:

I suggest you visit your friendly optician before polling day or you might end up crossing the wrong box.:biggrin:
 

Attachments

  • postings.jpg
    postings.jpg
    8.6 KB · Views: 253

youtalkcock

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
What's with all this "approximation" crap. Why don't you just look at what the database tells you?:rolleyes:

I suggest you visit your friendly optician before polling day or you might end up crossing the wrong box.:biggrin:

9802160704b68c4032055d8ded24a191f8392c3.gif
suits that imbecile fine. :eek::biggrin:
 

myfoot123

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
In summary, Brandtology & Tribal DDB sources are
  1. 44,000 blog postings,
  2. Tweets, and
  3. Facebook updates.

Their findings are (1) Party, (2) Item frequency, and (3) Rating in percentage, the no. of positive or very positive feedback:
  • PAP, 28,600 items, 52.8% +ve
  • WP, 6,200 items, 61.1% +ve
  • SPP, 940 items, 74.8% +ve
  • SDP, 3,600 items, 69.3% +ve

One thing is very certain, if they include Sammyboy.com as their 4th source, PAP +ve ratings would be shockingly low, to say the least.

I would strongly suggest that Brandtology and/or Tribal DDB include Sammyboy.com as a source for their ongoing project, then again, perhaps this forum is deliberately excluded as per request of their client(s)?

Hint: JamiQ, you may want to use this opportunity to do a self-sponsored project to focus on Sammyboy.com alone. Am very sure this project will give you huge marketing mileage over your SG competitor(s). Think about it, for the sake of your current and/or future investors. In the meantime, let's do an informal poll to see what Sammyboy.com forumers thinks about PAP.

Frankly, PAP ratings has been much lower than that. However, some hardcore dogs still idolise the father, son and the holy Goh.
 
Last edited:

talkincock

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Basket Wayne Piew! See you taking polls but no posting especially on Man Yoo thread.Why? You know Barcelona is going to end their european campaign right? :biggrin:
 

sense

Alfrescian
Loyal
Why don't you just look at what the database tells you?:rolleyes:

I suggest you visit your friendly optician before polling day or you might end up crossing the wrong box.:biggrin:

Thank-you for your information and suggestion.

1. Ok, we have 48,738 posts as of 28 Apr 2011, 04:24AM.

2. With Sammyboy.com postings (restricted to "Election Fever at the Coffee Shop" section) as the 4th source (other than the 44,000 blogs, tweets & facebook updates):

(a) Assuming that there are 70,000 postings (44,000 blogs + the rest), and their findings that 52.4% are PAP positive,
(b) from the informal poll of 19 forumers sentiments to date, ~2.9% of the sample feels that the postings here are positive, out of 48,738 items

A combined rating with Sammyboy.com as the 4th source would yield an estimation of 32.2%* positive ratings, or 67.8% negative ratings for PAP.

*(36820+1413.4) div (70000+48738) * 100% = 32.2%
 

sense

Alfrescian
Loyal
You fellows reminded me of our old friend QXP, the energizer bunny as I affectionately called him.

Don't be so hard on yourselves,

Take-it-Easy.gif
 
Last edited:
Top