If Iran hired a delusional swamp nigger like you to determine their foreign and defence policy, Tehran would most likely to be flattened within a matter of hours.
Maybe, they should not have hired a stupid nigger like you to determine their foreign and defence policy then.
Who would do the flattening within a matter of hours exactly?
What should have happened to them in the first place?
And if Iran is soooo weak, then why the hell did Iran start with chants of "Death to America Death to Israel etc".
To have nukes as an effective deterrent is one thing, but acquiring it is a different matter.
As a simpleton low IQ cowboy nigger, you should have realized this does not make any sense.
Israel, the U.S and the GCC will never allow Iran to have nuclear weapons and Iran cannot win a conventional war against the West and its allies.
They are nobody to allow or not allow anything if Iran is independent.
1. Iran is under sanctions, embargo, isolation. What does it matter what so called Israel, USA or GCC wants? Just erase Zionists from the face of the planet, send your spies, carry out assassinations. What about all the hype about drones?
Use those drones to take out Zionist defence sites, missiles, powerplants, nukes, etc etc.
Or you mean all the hype about drones - created by your US, Zionists and their "allies" - is also bogus.
2. Since Iran is under sanctions, embargo, isolation, Iran stands to lose nothing from more sanctions.
Who would do the flattening in a matter of hours? Exactly how and when did any country win an all out war in a matter of hours?
If you were not a stupid chigger, you would not have made this stupid bombastic assessment.
A low-intensity conflict however has enabled Iran to entrench themselves in Iraq, Yemen and Syria without losing that much.
There was absolutely no need for a low-intensity conflict in Iraq, Yemen and Syria if Iran is an Islamic Republic, as they call themselves, and their enemies are yanks and Zionists. Moreover, didn't Saudis and Iran supposedly patch up recently thanks to Tiongs? Then what? How come Saudi crown prince again made stupid statement to Yankee media that they will get a nuke "ONLY" if Iran gets one, but NOT while:
1. Yanks have nukes
2. Zionists have nukes
3. CECA have nukes
4. Tiongs have nukes
5. Russkies have nukes
6. Frogs have nukes
7. Pommies have nukes
Does it mean saudi crown prince immature MBS just reneged on the deal with Tiongs?
Iran nor any other country is interested in the protecting the ummah as the concept itself is just an empty and malleable political concept which could be molded to suit the individual interests of any Muslim state, Iran is solely interested in ensuring the survival of their own regime and their sphere of influence in the Middle East.
Iran never had any sphere of influence before the Yanks invaded Iraq in 2003. Saddam's Iraq to the West and Afghan Taliban to the East had then blocked essentially. Nowadays they may have patched up ties, to some extent, with Afghan Taliban. But that influence in Iraq was not there, in Yemen was not there, assistance to Palestine was not so extensive, Iran's presence in Syria not so entrenched.
By attempting to develop nuclear weapons, Iran will be utterly destroyed as a state.
Explain how that will happen. Don't give me a silly one liner like a stupid chink nigger.
It's not possible to compare North Korea with Iran even though they are relatively isolated states because Pyongyang has the backing of both China and Russia not to mention that the Kim regime has no interest in challenging the U.S as those nukes were solely developed for defensive purposes.
Nukes can never be used to defend anything.
You detonate nukes, you release immense amount of energy in short amount of time. It blasts your silly nigger arse to oblivion.
If Russkies are not aligned with Iran, then why exactly did Iran send drones to Russia? When the whole West has imposed sanctions on Russia, and no state was willing to deal with Russia in fear of sanctions from Yanks, including your much beloved Tiongs?
Are you joking norkies have no interest in challenging yanks?
Norkies have been threatening to nuke Yanks and obliterate every single living cell out of your yankee stupid nigger cowboy soyboy arse to oblivion for umpteen years now.
And they have demonstrated the resolve, the means, the tech, maybe the quantity of weapons that they can develop, that they can deliver on yankee shores to reach this aim. They have done this publicly, repeatedly, and their public demonstrations of such weaponry have only improved in quality and quantity over the years.
NK developing nukes did not disrupt but rather reinforced the strategic equilibrium in Northeast Asia.
What strategic equilibrium are you talking about? Tiongs were dead set against Norkeis developing nukes and imposed sanctions at the UN against it. Dun forget that. Norkies still went ahead and blasted the bomb anyway.
Stupid Iranians did jacksh*t although they too were sanctioned anyway at the Un by the same tiongs and russkies. Incompetent pathetic loser buffoons.
If Iran were to do the same, the current low-intensity conflict will escalate into a hot war with Israel and Saudi Arabia as the Israelis have a strong resolve to preemptively remove any threats before they arise.
If all that deters Iran from developing nukes is just a "strong" resolve from Zionists, then why the hell did these losers threaten and challenge Zionists in the first place?
If all that deters Iran from developing nukes is just a "strong" resolve from Zionists, then why don't the stupid Iranians just cave in and surrender so they won't be regime changed by the Zionists and Yanks?
Stupid Zionists can't even win against Iranian proxy in Lebanon in the form of Hezbollah and Iranians are a backward stupid incompetent people who are not talented enough to be the best in the world in just about anything, so what good is the stupid Zionists' resolve if Iran were even semi-competent and at least half as efficient as Norkies?
If you were not a stupid chink negro, you would not have come up with such a stupid set of self contradictory and asinine arguments while trying to sound intelligent by introducing "big words" like "strategic equilibrium".
