• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chitchat FW will not come bk in throng again

Hypocrite-The

Alfrescian
Loyal
Foreign workers may not return to Singapore in same numbers as before, say economists
A report released by the Ministry of Manpower last week showed that while Singapore saw the sharpest fall in total employment in more than 20 years, foreigners bore the brunt of the layoffs.

singapore cbd (1)
People walk during their lunch break in the financial business district of Raffles Place in Singapore on Jan 11, 2021. (Photo: AFP/Roslan RAHMAN)
Bookmark
SINGAPORE: It could take longer for skilled foreign workers to return to Singapore, and possibly in smaller numbers, compared to past recoveries from recessions, said economists following the release of the Labour Market Report 2020 last week.

The report, released by the Ministry of Manpower (MOM), said that while Singapore saw the sharpest fall in total employment in more than 20 years, foreigners bore the brunt of the layoffs.

After months of decline during the COVID-19 pandemic, resident employment - for Singaporeans and permanent residents - went up by 14,900 and rebounded to “slightly above pre-COVID levels”, said MOM.

This is in contrast to the 181,500 jobs lost by non-resident workers in 2020.

READ: Singapore's sharpest fall in employment in more than 20 years borne by non-resident workers: MOM
Maybank Kim Eng’s regional co-head of macro research, Dr Chua Hak Bin, said that the jobs situation for foreigners may not be a flash in the pan.

"Stricter foreign worker measures and border controls will likely impede the hiring of foreign workers, even for the skilled segment. There is a structural element, not just cyclical, as policies shift towards reducing the reliance on foreign labour," he told CNA.

In recent years, the Government has gradually tightened the flow of foreign workers, and last year, the qualifying salaries for S Passes and Employment Pass holders were raised again.

The minimum qualifying salary for S Passes, which are for mid-skilled employees, went up to S$2,500 last year, and the quota for foreign workers was cut for some industries. The minimum salaries for EP holders also went up to S$4,500.

COMPANIES CAUTIOUS WITH HIRING

MOM said that non-resident employment declined in all sectors, with the bulk in construction and manufacturing. Three-quarters of the decline was from holders of work permit and other work passes, which are generally in lower-skilled jobs.

But there was also a fall in skilled foreign labour, with a 26,000 decrease in S Pass holders and 16,700 fewer EP holders.

While there is no breakdown by sector for S Pass and EP holders, Dr Chua said that the industries shedding foreign workers are probably in the sectors where job losses have been large. These are in construction, manufacturing and food & beverage services in 2020.

"Hard-hit sectors like aviation and accommodation probably shed more foreign workers, as wage subsidies for retaining locals were especially generous," he added.

Commentary: Were you fired or retrenched? Your employer may not tell you the difference
Mr Monty Sujanani, country manager of recruitment agency Robert Walters Singapore said that in general, companies have been cautious with hiring during COVID-19.

"Even before COVID-19, companies have always been focused on hiring Singaporeans first due to the TAFEP regulations though there is now greater opportunity to support local hires, particularly Singaporeans who have been made redundant or retrenched," he said.

"At the same time, we have also seen a number of expatriates/foreign professionals moving back home which has created more opportunities for Singaporeans and PRs."

He added that for foreigners based overseas, it has become more challenging to move them to Singapore, given the travel and border restrictions as well as the changes to EP and dependent pass requirements.

MOM earlier this month tightened the requirements for dependents of foreigners who want to find work here.
 

Hypocrite-The

Alfrescian
Loyal
The main issue is the competition from the pmet category. That should n must b reserved for singkies only. The blue collar jobs will have no issues getting foreigners in. Because for these blue collar foreigners jobs, they r better off working in singkieland n they are lucky they get to work in singkieland
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
A report released by the Ministry of Manpower last week showed that while Singapore saw the sharpest fall in total employment in more than 20 years, foreigners bore the brunt of the layoffs.

Oh dear, bless your bleeding xenophilic hearts! What would you do without those departed FTs? :rolleyes:
 

Hypocrite-The

Alfrescian
Loyal
This article is basically to support the return of foreigners pmets n SHITCAs etc. This is where singkies r most discriminated. But of course Nothing said as the gahmen n companies benefit from the flood gates being opened.

Even kangaroo land has as admitted that foreigners depressed wages

Why closed borders mean you may finally get a bigger pay rise
Posted 2d
A woman walks away from newspaper jobs in a rubbish bin
With international borders closed, will the bargaining power of Australian workers increase?( ABC Western Qld: Damien Lakrins, File Photo )
Have a think about this.

The size of Australia's "labour force" is roughly 13.8 million people.

That's the pool of workers in the economy.

Now, imagine it can't grow quickly.

It can only grow slowly as babies are born, and with very low levels of immigration.

In such a scenario, if there's a shortage of skills in the economy, workers with those skills will become more valuable.

If employers want to hire them, those workers will have more "bargaining power" and can demand higher wages.

And if the economy starts growing strongly and unemployment rates decline across a range of industries, the bargaining power of lots of workers will increase.

Eventually, employers will have no choice but to pay higher wages to lots of people.

If you were an employer, what would you do in that situation?

Ask the government to increase the supply of labour
One solution would be to lobby the government to allow much higher levels of immigration.

That way, the labour supply would increase by a lot, giving you more workers to choose from.

And you'd want those higher levels of immigration to remain in place. Year after year.

Net overseas migration and population growth
The components of Australia's population growth, by calendar year, from 1981 to 2018.( Scanlon Foundation Research Institute; Bureau Of Statistics )
If that occurred, it would remove wage pressures from the economy.

Why? Because with hundreds of thousands of new workers joining the labour force every year, the bargaining power of existing workers would diminish.

It would stop skills shortages occurring, too.

Australia experienced something like this
The above scenario is simplistic.

But it matches the broad outline of what happened in Australia's economy over the last thirty years.

See the graph above, from the Scanlon Foundation Research Institute.

In the early 2000s, the Howard Government began sharply increasing Australia's immigration intake, and the higher levels of immigration were maintained by subsequent Labor and Coalition governments.

The size of the labour force expanded by 46 per cent in 20 years, from 9.4 million in January 2000 to 13.7 million in January last year.

Over the same period, Australia's population grew by roughly 30 per cent, so the labour force increased at a faster rate.

It was accompanied by a change in the composition of Australia's immigration program, away from permanent migration towards temporary migration.

"The overall effect was to integrate much of the Australian labour market into a global labour market for the first time," says economics Professor Ross Garnaut in his latest book.

"Integration into a global labour market held down wages during the resources boom, [but] it contributed to persistent unemployment, rising underemployment and stagnant real wages during the expansion of total economic activity [between 2013 and 2020]."

We could be embarking on an experiment
However, Australia is at a crossroads now.

International borders were closed last year during the lockdowns and they haven't reopened.

That's had a huge impact on immigration.

Between April 1 and September 30 last year, net overseas migration to Australia declined by 41,815 people, meaning more people left the country than arrived here.

With migration disappearing, Australia's population grew by just 23,919 people over the period.

It begs the question: what will happen if borders remain closed for a couple of years?

According to Commonwealth Bank's head of Australian economics, Gareth Aird, it could see wages start to grow.

With borders closed, the labour supply can't grow as quickly
In a note to clients last week, Mr Aird explained why.

He said before 2020, Australia's economic policy settings were suppressing wages and our historically-high levels of immigration had something to do with it.

"Pre-COVID, Australia had for many years run a very high immigration intake by OECD standards and this meant strong population growth," he said.

"Australia had a high level of immigration despite low wages growth and a relatively high level of underutilisation (the broadest measure of labour market slack)."

He said Australia was accepting higher-than-necessary levels of skilled migration too, which contributed to the weakness in wages.

"'Skilled' migration was worth around 70 per cent of the total migration programme outcome pre-COVID," he said.

"In industries with skills shortages, bargaining power between the employee and employer should move more favourably in the direction of the employee and higher wages should be forthcoming.

"But in Australia's case pre-COVID there was no evidence of widespread skills shortages based on the broad-based weakness in wages growth.

"The relatively high intake of skilled workers looked to be a pre-emptive strike on the expectation there would be skills shortages in the future."

However, Mr Aird said now that migration had disappeared, the bargaining power of workers should start increasing.

"If firms are not able to recruit from abroad then, as the labour market tightens, skills shortages will manifest themselves faster than otherwise and this will allow some workers to push for higher pay," he said.

However, it depends on borders remaining closed
Mr Aird said things were "very different right now" with the international borders closed.

He suspected the labour market would improve reasonably quickly from here and has forecast an unemployment rate of 5 per cent by the end of 2022 (it's currently 5.8 per cent).

However, he said there was a lot of uncertainty around when the international borders would reopen and what that would mean for the migration program and how it would impact wages around the country.

"We do not have all the answers," Mr Aird told his clients.

"We will continue to retain an open mind to how the economy may evolve over the next few years.

"And we would not be surprised to see some skills shortages manifest themselves as the labour market tightens, in the form of pockets of wages growth," he said.

Posted 2d
ago
 

birdie69

Alfrescian
Loyal
I still see a lot of smelly Indians. Are u sure the numbers reduced or I am having double vision ?
They try to make up the drop in numbers by bringing more CECA Indians now, so there will be positive increases by end of this year and subsequent years.
 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
sinkies deserve cumuppance by their gov they erected. instead of spending time and energy on sg politics sinkies like redbull (@redbull313) and many others here would rather waste their marbles on u.s. politics. kpkb about trump and his actions and policies even after he left office. these loser sinkies (and their tiong fuckers) need to look at home and kpkb at their own backyard instead of spamming this site with u.s. political shit.
 
Last edited:

mahjongking

Alfrescian
Loyal
The main issue is the competition from the pmet category. That should n must b reserved for singkies only. The blue collar jobs will have no issues getting foreigners in. Because for these blue collar foreigners jobs, they r better off working in singkieland n they are lucky they get to work in singkieland


totally agreed,
the fucking pappies keeps side stepping this issue because they want to support the condo rentals
they still think 99% of the locals are fools, only 61% are fools nowadays
 

mahjongking

Alfrescian
Loyal
sinkies deserve cumuppance by their gov they erected. instead of spending time and energy on sg politics sinkies like redbull (@redbull313) and many others here would rather waste their marbles on u.s. politics. kpkb about trump and his actions and policies even after he left office. these looser sinkies (and their tiong fuckers) need to look at home and kpkb at their own backyard instead of spamming this site with u.s. political shit.


suits the pappies
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
I still see a lot of smelly Indians. Are u sure the numbers reduced or I am having double vision ?

If they have received the blue NRIC, they are no longer CECAs or FTs, but fellow Sinkies. Official term: 'Singapore residents'. :wink:
 

syed putra

Alfrescian
Loyal
I still see a lot of smelly Indians. Are u sure the numbers reduced or I am having double vision ?
Thats the smell of your own armpits.go have a bath once in a while.if house have no bathroom to shower like in china, use the ones in the gym. Pretend to exercise.
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
All this carnage just to fend off a virus that has killed only 0.03% of the population. The response has been way out of proportion to the severity of the disease.
 
Top