• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Former ST political desk journalist: We were not allowed to report on good opposition candidates or highlight anything good about them

Voldermort

Alfrescian
Loyal
I get super worked up when I hear people say "opposition candidates are not good". I also feel bad because as a journalist on the Straits Times political desk, I was part of the media machinery that helped perpetuate this image.


There always have been really good opposition candidates who dared to put themselves up for election - you just never heard about them because we were not allowed to report on good opposition candidates or highlight anything good about them. But news of silly minor things that made them look bad - those we played up. (Photos of them with eyes half closed, mouths open, looking sweaty etc were encouraged.)


There were, of course, a fair number of real nutjobs that emerged during elections. Those we played up. A lot. To build up the image that opposition is ridiculous and have no real candidates. If you still feel that way, it means you fell for the ploy.


My favourite opposition candidate was Dr Wong Wee Nam who has since passed away. I covered his candidacy in 1997. If you've never heard of him and still think "opposition" never had good people... well, that's thanks to mainstream media.


I tried my best to give Dr Wong and his team fair coverage. Once even managed to get a full page coverage for his party then - National Solidarity Party. It actually went to print... but boy was there hell to pay the next day. Editors had to scramble to explain to the "higher ups" why opposition candidates were given so much coverage.


Editors explained to us later on, in seemingly-logical language that "coverage of parties must be proportionate to the number of MPs they had in government". Meaning it is totally fair for opposition candidates to get little to no coverage.

More at https://shrtcô.de/Rbofie
 

Scrooball (clone)

Alfrescian
Loyal
There are no good oppies. How to write any thing good u tell me? :o-o:
It’s like forcing a movie reviewer to say that Ah Girls Go Army is a cinematic masterpiece
1654906590381.jpeg
 

tanwahtiu

Alfrescian
Loyal
I get super worked up when I hear people say "opposition candidates are not good". I also feel bad because as a journalist on the Straits Times political desk, I was part of the media machinery that helped perpetuate this image.


There always have been really good opposition candidates who dared to put themselves up for election - you just never heard about them because we were not allowed to report on good opposition candidates or highlight anything good about them. But news of silly minor things that made them look bad - those we played up. (Photos of them with eyes half closed, mouths open, looking sweaty etc were encouraged.)


There were, of course, a fair number of real nutjobs that emerged during elections. Those we played up. A lot. To build up the image that opposition is ridiculous and have no real candidates. If you still feel that way, it means you fell for the ploy.


My favourite opposition candidate was Dr Wong Wee Nam who has since passed away. I covered his candidacy in 1997. If you've never heard of him and still think "opposition" never had good people... well, that's thanks to mainstream media.


I tried my best to give Dr Wong and his team fair coverage. Once even managed to get a full page coverage for his party then - National Solidarity Party. It actually went to print... but boy was there hell to pay the next day. Editors had to scramble to explain to the "higher ups" why opposition candidates were given so much coverage.


Editors explained to us later on, in seemingly-logical language that "coverage of parties must be proportionate to the number of MPs they had in government". Meaning it is totally fair for opposition candidates to get little to no coverage.

More at https://shrtcô.de/Rbofie

Last thing to trust is journalism.... find trouble spots and ballon it like heroship worshipping a Superstar opposition.... no news is good news....

Look at the West.... Fox News controlled by who.... also told to say anti-China news to anger the readers....

Ban journalism.... anyway poor grade A level students with 65% grade can get a uni degree... journalism.... all the parents want is the children has a university degree... shaft them to journalism 65% grade ...
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
That's because there is no freedom of press in a totalitarian shithole that is Sinkieland.

Your so-called 'journalism' is comparable to the standards in China. Your only mission is to kiss the ass of your Supreme Leeder. :cool:
 

tanwahtiu

Alfrescian
Loyal
That's because there is no freedom of press in a totalitarian shithole that is Sinkieland.

Your so-called 'journalism' is comparable to the standards in China. Your only mission is to kiss the ass of your Supreme Leeder. :cool:
There is no freedom of press in US anymore...
Burn...
 
Top