• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Former richest man of China is charged with financial crimes

GoFlyKiteNow

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
2,605
Points
0
Former richest man of China is charged with financial crimes

Tycoon is indicted amid growing unease of Beijing elite over private wealth

By James Moore, Deputy Business Editor
Tuesday, 16 February 2010

A tycoon who was once the richest man in China was charged yesterday with bribery, insider trading and illegal business dealings.

The trial of Huang Guangyu, the founder of China's largest consumer electronics chain, Gome Electrical Appliances, will be the highest-profile case yet involving a private entrepreneur in the country.

It will be watched closely by China's business community because it highlights the risks of operating in the Communist state.

While the economy has grown at breakneck pace since Beijing adopted market reforms, it can still prove to be a minefield for business people because of politics and the need to stay in favour with party officials.

Hundreds of government apparatchiks are reported to have been rounded up during the investigation into Mr Huang's operations, which saw him amass a fortune once estimated at $6.3bn.

Reports of the charges in state media suggest that his penalty could be much harsher than was first expected when he disappeared into custody about 15 months ago. He was initially held on suspicion of stock market manipulation, but during his time in jail several officials have been ousted after themselves being accused of corruption. They include a former deputy minister of public security and a former deputy police chief of Shanghai.

The first indications that there was more to the case came on Christmas Eve, when prosecutors claimed to have uncovered evidence pointing to "new crimes" involving Mr Huang. That facilitated an extension of his detention, leading to speculation that more serious charges would be levelled.

Mr Huang's life story has been one of rags to riches. He was one of the entrepreneurs who benefited from a boom that is expected to see China confirmed as the world's second-biggest economy later this year, and the world's biggest before too long.

The 40-year-old son of poor, devout Christian peasants from the southern port of Shantou, he turned his single street stall selling radios and watches into a huge chain with almost 600 branches across mainland China. He was nicknamed the "price butcher" because of the discounts available in his stores, had a growing property empire and lived in a big home hung with chandeliers in a gated compound in Beijing.

His arrest once again put the spotlight on the opacity of China's justice system – he disappeared for several days before any announcement was made.


The Hong Kong Stock Exchange, where Gome Electrical is listed, was forced to suspend trading in the company's shares briefly after his arrest.

Mr Huang's wife and elder brother have also been held in connection with the case, although it is not yet known whether they have been charged.

The case comes at a time of increasing unease in China about the vast wealth gained by some business people.

In a poll by The People's Daily, the Communist Party mouthpiece, a majority of respondents said they felt that individuals or families who had gained during the boom years were "corrupt".

Only 16 per cent thought such wealth had been accrued through "wisdom or hard work".
.
 
No one, can climb to that spot without corruption, so I don't know why they want to wayang like the PAP, if you want to excecute every corrupt business man and officials, you can almost reduce the population by 80%.
 
No one, can climb to that spot without corruption, so I don't know why they want to wayang like the PAP, if you want to excecute every corrupt business man and officials, you can almost reduce the population by 80%.

Wise words indeed.

In the business world, it's all about Relationships... and TRUST.
 
Former richest man of China is charged with financial crimes

Tycoon is indicted amid growing unease of Beijing elite over private wealth

By James Moore, Deputy Business Editor
Tuesday, 16 February 2010

A tycoon who was once the richest man in China was charged yesterday with bribery, insider trading and illegal business dealings.

The trial of Huang Guangyu, the founder of China's largest consumer electronics chain, Gome Electrical Appliances, will be the highest-profile case yet involving a private entrepreneur in the country.

It will be watched closely by China's business community because it highlights the risks of operating in the Communist state.

While the economy has grown at breakneck pace since Beijing adopted market reforms, it can still prove to be a minefield for business people because of politics and the need to stay in favour with party officials.

Hundreds of government apparatchiks are reported to have been rounded up during the investigation into Mr Huang's operations, which saw him amass a fortune once estimated at $6.3bn.

Reports of the charges in state media suggest that his penalty could be much harsher than was first expected when he disappeared into custody about 15 months ago. He was initially held on suspicion of stock market manipulation, but during his time in jail several officials have been ousted after themselves being accused of corruption. They include a former deputy minister of public security and a former deputy police chief of Shanghai.

The first indications that there was more to the case came on Christmas Eve, when prosecutors claimed to have uncovered evidence pointing to "new crimes" involving Mr Huang. That facilitated an extension of his detention, leading to speculation that more serious charges would be levelled.

Mr Huang's life story has been one of rags to riches. He was one of the entrepreneurs who benefited from a boom that is expected to see China confirmed as the world's second-biggest economy later this year, and the world's biggest before too long.

The 40-year-old son of poor, devout Christian peasants from the southern port of Shantou, he turned his single street stall selling radios and watches into a huge chain with almost 600 branches across mainland China. He was nicknamed the "price butcher" because of the discounts available in his stores, had a growing property empire and lived in a big home hung with chandeliers in a gated compound in Beijing.

His arrest once again put the spotlight on the opacity of China's justice system – he disappeared for several days before any announcement was made.


The Hong Kong Stock Exchange, where Gome Electrical is listed, was forced to suspend trading in the company's shares briefly after his arrest.

Mr Huang's wife and elder brother have also been held in connection with the case, although it is not yet known whether they have been charged.

The case comes at a time of increasing unease in China about the vast wealth gained by some business people.

In a poll by The People's Daily, the Communist Party mouthpiece, a majority of respondents said they felt that individuals or families who had gained during the boom years were "corrupt".

Only 16 per cent thought such wealth had been accrued through "wisdom or hard work".
.

China are nothing but pricks! India seems better.
 
If the system dares to go after such a wealthy individual despite his political backing - this is a good sign.

In many countries, the rich are above the law, they help write the laws. How many billionaires have been thrown in prison? Pretty much all billionaires get to their lofty status via some political connections. So why is it that we see so few of them in prison?
 
This is no big deal. Soon, there will be a thread that says "Former richest man in Singapore (Lee Kuan Yew) is charged with financial crimes"
 
If the system dares to go after such a wealthy individual despite his political backing - this is a good sign.

In many countries, the rich are above the law, they help write the laws. How many billionaires have been thrown in prison? Pretty much all billionaires get to their lofty status via some political connections. So why is it that we see so few of them in prison?

Have you any idea how the laws are written in rich developed countries like the USA and Europe?,,obviously not.

This man in China was arrested only recently for his "crimes".

Do not be apologetic about China's legal system.
A communist legal system can never be honest or straight or transparent.
Because it reports to the PARTY. The Party is supreme. Not the courts.

Where there is no transparency, there is corruption.
Fact 101 of corruption.
 
Laws in US are written by Congress who get most of the campaign $ by lobby groups. No money no TV ads no ability to remain in Congress.

Just take a look at the recent health care plan. Read in the economists that lobby groups (insurance, lawyers) spent close to $400M in ads to defeat the plan. And that is after Obama placated the powerful pharma lobby and doctors by giving in to their demands.

After the financial fiasco that pretty much crippled US financial industry so far the only one that has been charged is BOA CEO (a few weeks ago). I cannot believe that BOA CEO alone brought down the US financial sector. What happened to the CEO of Goldman Sach (single largest political contributor), Morgan Stanley, Citibank, etc etc etc. What about financial industry reforms???

Agree that Chinese laws are at best opaque and much reform is needed. But it is enlightening to see even billionaires or city leaders get taken down. QUite a few of these city leaders were close political pals of the Premier etc etc. This is a change from many countries where billionaires are above the law because they fund the political campaigns. When was the last time you saw a billionaire get taken down.

Now if the argument is that billionaires are all good guys then ....

But my take is that billionaires use their $$$ to hire the best lawyers, pay the politicians to look the other way and are in a way above the law.

Please show me how a "democractic system" in a 3rd world country like India, Phillipines can be honest? The rich give $$ to the politicians who then use the $$ to buy off illiterate Indian farmers for their votes so that the politicians can remain in power. In return the politicans reward the rich with costly public projects. Remember, since 41% of Indians live on LESS than $1.25(75% live in less than $2 a day, the buying power of the rich goes a long way).

The Communist political system works in this instance because they do not need to be beholden to the rich. After all they do not have all these frequent elections and the reqired $$ to buy the votes. So there is less pressure to raise $. Now please, I am NOT for communist system. Just pointing out that it works for the Chinese at this stage of development vs India democracy that has been hijacked by the wealthy.

As long as you have 75% of your pop living on less than US$2 a day you are a failure. The Chinese have 36% of their pop on less than $2 a day. Forget about political system just see on the ground living conditions of the citizens.

I agree that democratic system is best in a 1st world country with a vibrant educated middle class. The challenge for Beijing is that the middle class (educated, well travelled have $$) is growing rapidly. They have access to computers, internet, travel overseas. They are the ones that will be pressuring Beijing for change, for representation. And this is come as fast as its economic growth and the current political system is unable to handle it. So in a way Beijing could become a victim of its own success!

Your quote on corruption is very true "Where there is no transparency, there is corruption.
Fact 101 of corruption"


In a study (see below), China stands at 79 and India is at 84 in terms of corruption (I think New Zealand is at 1). So there appears to be even less transparency in india since based on your quote the more the transparency the less the corruption. Now how can you have less transparancy in a democratic system since democracy = accountability?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corruption_Perceptions_Index

Have you any idea how the laws are written in rich developed countries like the USA and Europe?,,obviously not.

This man in China was arrested only recently for his "crimes".

Do not be apologetic about China's legal system.
A communist legal system can never be honest or straight or transparent.
Because it reports to the PARTY. The Party is supreme. Not the courts.

Where there is no transparency, there is corruption.
Fact 101 of corruption.
 
Last edited:
Laws in US are written by Congress who get most of the campaign $ by lobby groups. No money no TV ads no ability to remain in Congress.

Just take a look at the recent health care plan. Read in the economists that lobby groups (insurance, lawyers) spent close to $400M in ads to defeat the plan. And that is after Obama placated the powerful pharma lobby and doctors by giving in to their demands.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corruption_Perceptions_Index

Gee.....Do you know that each and every law that is written by congress and passed by congress is subject ( and often challenged ) to judicial review by the highest court in the land..the supreme court, which can strike the law down if it is found to violate the rights enshrined in the constitution ?..such as freedom of expression etc etc.

Do you know there are three INDEPENDENT equal power pillars in a democracy..?
The Executive - The president
The Legislative - House of Reps, senate ( parliament)
The Judiciary - The Supreme Court ( Guardian of the constitution.)

This is the check and balance mechanism in a democratic system.

In China, there is only one authority. The communist Party. It is the judge, the jury and the hangman all rolled into one.

Dont compare this Commie party apparatus with 22 million card members to the open democratic system of the west with its inherent check and balances.

In fact there is no comparison.

Abt the health care plan. What about it. Dont you understand that under a free country, all expression of forces have the right to show their views?
That is the price of democratic setups. Slow, tardy, but SELF CORRECTING by the people. No quick fix. But enduring fix.

So enduring is the system that its currency, the US dollar is held in trust even by the corrupt commie party kings of PRC.

That is solid proof, which system is superior.

Unless you want to live in self denial mode and accept delusions.
 
No one, can climb to that spot without corruption, so I don't know why they want to wayang like the PAP, if you want to excecute every corrupt business man and officials, you can almost reduce the population by 80%.
He must have offended someone.
 
He must have offended someone.

This must be the case my fren was talking about. According to my fren, someone was caught bribing very high level CCP leaders. The money trail end at a level just below Hu Jintao. No one dared to move after that.

Took them 15 months to decide to put a bullet into this man's head.
 
Wise words indeed.

In the business world, it's all about Relationships... and TRUST.

关系 (guanxi) means relationship or connection, close enough to get something illegal done for you.

信用 (xinyong) means trust, that you won't sell me out when things blow up.
 
Not true. Acc to Pareto principle, 20% of population account for 80% of China's riches, which means the other 80% are poor.

Going after the rich means eliminating possibly only 20% of pop.

No one, can climb to that spot without corruption, so I don't know why they want to wayang like the PAP, if you want to excecute every corrupt business man and officials, you can almost reduce the population by 80%.
 
JBJ was sued till his underwear was ripped off for making a similar statement that he was holding (in his hand) Tang Liang Hong's police report alleging a corrupt PAP govt. He didnt even say it. TLH was also pursued.


This is no big deal. Soon, there will be a thread that says "Former richest man in Singapore (Lee Kuan Yew) is charged with financial crimes"
 
Back
Top