• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Former property agent's fine cut from $18k to $8k

Hasbro

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Jan 29, 2013
Messages
257
Points
0

Former property agent's fine cut from $18k to $8k

<iframe src="//www.youtube.com/embed/ZD2wB5Ng-4s?rel=0" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="480" width="640"></iframe>

Selina Lum
The Straits Times
Saturday, Jun 21, 2014

SINGAPORE - A former property agent - the first to be charged for referring clients to moneylenders under toughened rules - had his sentence reduced by the High Court on appeal yesterday.

In slashing the fine handed down to Ghazali Mohamed Rasul from $18,000 to $8,000, Judicial Commissioner See Kee Oon agreed with defence counsel that the fine was disproportionately high.

In December 2012, the Council for Estate Agencies brought six charges against Ghazali for referring four clients to a licensed moneylender and receiving payments from the moneylender.

Then with PropNex Realty, he was the first agent to be prosecuted by the council for moneylending-related offences. Under the Estate Agents Act, it is an offence for agents to introduce, refer or recommend or suggest the use of the services of any moneylender to clients.

Last year, Ghazali pleaded guilty to two charges relating to one client, relief taxi driver Mohammad Redzuwan Ibrahim. The other four charges were taken into consideration.

Mr Redzuwan, who was selling his Housing Board flat, told Ghazali that he was financially strapped and asked Ghazali to introduce a moneylender to him. In June 2011, Ghazali took his client to a licensed moneylender, AM Credit, where Mr Redzuwan took out a $7,000 loan. The moneylender paid Ghazali a $150 "referral fee".

District Judge Christopher Goh fined Ghazali $18,000. As there were no sentencing precedents, the judge referred to sentencing benchmarks for cases of unregistered salespersons performing the work of estate agents.

But Ghazali's lawyer, Mr Derek Kang, argued that the judge was wrong to have relied on these cases as a starting point and should instead have referred to cases under the Prevention of Corruption Act for accepting bribes.

[email protected]


 
Back
Top